Analisis anteseden inovasi hijau terhadap kinerja berkelanjutan pada UMKM berbasis pangan di Kediri Raya

Izzati Ardhan Firdausyi; Endah Rahayu Lestari; Wike Agustin Prima Dania

doi:10.21107/agrointek.v17i1.13610

Analisis anteseden inovasi hijau terhadap kinerja berkelanjutan pada UMKM berbasis pangan di Kediri Raya

Izzati Ardhan Firdausyi, Endah Rahayu Lestari, Wike Agustin Prima Dania

Abstract

Nowadays, environmental problems are increasing. This is largely due to production activities carried out by large and small industries, one of which is MSMEs. The increasing number of SMEs that have sprung up also increases their impact on the environment. Increasing environmental problems encourage companies to be environmentally oriented and green innovation to be the right solution for these problems. The purpose of this study was to examine the antecedent variables of green innovation (technology capability and CSR/Corporate Social Responsibility) in MSMEs and the effect of implementing green innovation on sustainable performance. Then examine the effect of environmental dynamics in moderating the relationship between green innovation and sustainable performance. The conceptual model was verified using the Partial Least Square (PLS) method. Data were obtained from 100 food-based SMEs in Kediri Raya. The results showed that the antecedent variables (technology capability and CSR/Corporate Social Responsibility) had a significant positive effect on green innovation. Furthermore, green innovation has a significant positive effect on sustainable performance. Environmental dynamics have a significant negative effect on the relationship between green innovation and sustainable performance. The results of this study offer important implications for MSMEs to be more concerned and increase green innovation to achieve sustainable performance.

Keywords

Green Innovation; MSMEs; Sustainable Performance

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Abbas, J. 2020. Impact of total quality management on corporate green performance through the mediating role of corporate social responsibility. J. Clean. Prod. 242, 118458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118458

Abdillah, W., Jogiyanto. 2015. Partial Least Square (PLS) Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dalam Penelitian Bisnis. Penerbit ANDI, Yogyakarta.

Aboelmaged, M. 2018. Direct and indirect effects of eco-innovation, environmental orientation and supplier collaboration on hotel performance: An empirical study. J. Clean. Prod. 184, 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.192

Azadegan, A., Patel, P.C., Zangoueinezhad, A., Linderman, K. 2013. The effect of environmental complexity and environmental dynamism on lean practices. J. Oper. Manag. 31, 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.03.002

BPS Kota Kediri. 2021. Kota Kediri dalam Angka 2021. BPS Kota Kediri, Kediri.

Ch’ng, P.C., Cheah, J., Amran, A. 2021. Eco-innovation practices and sustainable business performance: The moderating effect of market turbulence in the Malaysian technology industry. J. Clean. Prod. 283, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124556

Chan, H.K., Yee, R.W.Y., Dai, J., Lim, M.K. 2016. The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 181, 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.006

Cheng, C.C.J., Yang, C.L., Sheu, C. 2014. The link between eco-innovation and business performance: A Taiwanese industry context. J. Clean. Prod. 64, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.050

Cuerva, M.C., Triguero-Cano, Á., Córcoles, D. 2014. Drivers of green and non-green innovation: Empirical evidence in Low-Tech SMEs. J. Clean. Prod. 68, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.049

Dania, W.A.P., Xing, K., Amer, Y. 2019. An integrated collaboration framework for sustainable sugar supply chains. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 8, 706–717.

El-Kassar, A.N., Singh, S.K. 2019. Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 144, 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.016

Groß, M. 2018. Heterogeneity in consumers’ mobile shopping acceptance: A finite mixture partial least squares modelling approach for exploring and characterising different shopper segments. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 40, 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.09.002

Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. 2011. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 19, 139–152.

Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M., Manolova, T.S. 2018. Internationalization and economic performance: The mediating role of eco-innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 171, 1312–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.111

IPCC. 2006. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Jiménez-Parra, B., Alonso-Martínez, D., Godos-Díez, J.L. 2018. The influence of corporate social responsibility on air pollution: Analysis of environmental regulation and eco-innovation effects. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 25, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1645

Junianto, D., Sabtohadi, J. 2020. Pengaruh Sistem Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Industri Pabrik Gula. Equilib. J. Ilm. Ekon. Manaj. dan Akunt. 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35906/je001.v9i1.423

Kunapatarawong, R., Martínez-Ros, E. 2016. Towards green growth: How does green innovation affect employment? Res. Policy 45, 1218–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.013

Lee, C.H., Wu, K.J., Tseng, M.L. 2018. Resource management practice through eco-innovation toward sustainable development using qualitative information and quantitative data. J. Clean. Prod. 202, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.058

Li, L., Msaad, H., Sun, H., Tan, M.X., Lu, Y., Lau, A.K.W. 2020. Green innovation and business sustainability: New evidence from energy intensive industry in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217826

Liu, X., Zou, H., Ghauri, P. 2010. Technology Capability and the Internationalization Strategies of New Ventures. Organ. Mark. Emerg. Econ. 1, 100–119. https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2010.1.1.14308

Mehralian, G., Nazari, J.A., Zarei, L., Rasekh, H.R. 2016. The effects of corporate social responsibility on organizational performance in the Iranian pharmaceutical industry: The mediating role of TQM. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.116

Meng, M., Lei, J., Jiao, J., Tao, Q. 2020. How does strategic flexibility affect bricolage: The moderating role of environmental turbulence. PLoS One 15, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238030

Miao, C., Fang, D., Sun, L., Luo, Q. 2017. Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 126, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.019

Mun’im, A. 2012. Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Ketersediaan, Akses, Dan Penyerapan Pangan Terhadap Ketahanan Pangan Di Kabupaten Surplus Pangan: Pendekatan Partial Least Square Path Modeling. J. agro Ekon. 30, 41–58.

Pacheco, D.A. de J., Caten, C.S. ten, Jung, C.F., Navas, H.V.G., Cruz-Machado, V.A. 2018. Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs from emerging markets: Systematic literature review and challenges. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. - JET-M 48, 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.002

Patel, P.C., Azadegan, A., Ellram, L.M. 2013. The effects of strategic and structural supply chain orientation on operational and customer-focused performance. Decis. Sci. 44, 713–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12034

Pemerintah Kota Kediri. 2018. Peraturan Daerah Kota Kediri Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 Tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Daerah Kota Kediri Nomor 12 Tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Kota Kediri Tahun 2014-2019.

Raimi, L. 2017. Understanding theories of corporate social responsibility in the Ibero-American hospitality industry. Dev. Corp. Gov. Responsib. 11, 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-052320170000011004

Rezende, L. de A., Bansi, A.C., Alves, M.F.R., Galina, S.V.R. 2019. Take your time: Examining when green innovation affects financial performance in multinationals. J. Clean. Prod. 233, 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.135

Saeidi, Sayedeh Parastoo, Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, Sayyedeh Parisa, Saaeidi, S.A. 2015. How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. J. Bus. Res. 68, 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.024

Sáez-Martínez, F.J., Díaz-García, C., Gonzalez-Moreno, A. 2016. Firm technological trajectory as a driver of eco-innovation in young small and medium-sized enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 138, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.108

Salisu, Y., Bakar, L.J.A. 2020. Technological capability, relational capability and firms’ performance: The role of learning capability. Rev. Gest. 27, 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-03-2019-0040

Sehnem, S., Lazzarotti, F., Bencke, F.F. 2016. Sustainable practices and eco-innovations adopted by industrial companies. Int. J. Innov. 4, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v4i2.106

Seman, N.A.A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Saman, M.Z.M.S., Jooker, R.E., Ozkul, S. 2019. The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation on the Relationship between Green Supply Chain Management and Environmental Performance. J. Clean. Prod. 229, 115–127.

Suganthi, L. 2019. Examining the relationship between corporate social responsibility, performance, employees’ pro-environmental behavior at work with green practices as mediator. J. Clean. Prod. 232, 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.295

Tariq, A., Badir, Y.F., Tariq, W., Bhutta, U.S. 2017. Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook. Technol. Soc. 51, 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.06.002

TNP2K. 2020. Pemetaan Program Pemberdayaan Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM). Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan, Jakarta Pusat.

Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., Hariyati, H., Nafidah, L.N., Kustiningsih, N., Nadyaningrum, V. 2020. The role of green innovation between green market orientation and business performance: its implication for open innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 6, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040173

Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., Davia, M.A. 2013. Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecol. Econ. 92, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.009

Tsai, M.T., Chuang, L.M., Chao, S.T., Chang, H.P. 2012. The effects assessment of firm environmental strategy and customer environmental conscious on green product development. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184, 4435–4447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2275-4

Wu, W., Liu, Y., Chin, T., Zhu, W. 2018. Will green CSR enhance innovation? A perspective of public visibility and firm transparency. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020268

Zailani, S., Govindan, K., Iranmanesh, M., Shaharudin, M.R., Sia Chong, Y. 2015. Green innovation adoption in automotive supply chain: The Malaysian case. J. Clean. Prod. 108, 1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.039