Analisis anteseden inovasi hijau terhadap kinerja berkelanjutan pada UMKM berbasis pangan di Kediri Raya

Izzati Ardhan Firdausyi, Endah Rahayu Lestari, Wike Agustin Prima Dania


Nowadays, environmental problems are increasing. This is largely due to production activities carried out by large and small industries, one of which is MSMEs. The increasing number of SMEs that have sprung up also increases their impact on the environment. Increasing environmental problems encourage companies to be environmentally oriented and green innovation to be the right solution for these problems. The purpose of this study was to examine the antecedent variables of green innovation (technology capability and CSR/Corporate Social Responsibility) in MSMEs and the effect of implementing green innovation on sustainable performance. Then examine the effect of environmental dynamics in moderating the relationship between green innovation and sustainable performance. The conceptual model was verified using the Partial Least Square (PLS) method. Data were obtained from 100 food-based SMEs in Kediri Raya. The results showed that the antecedent variables (technology capability and CSR/Corporate Social Responsibility) had a significant positive effect on green innovation. Furthermore, green innovation has a significant positive effect on sustainable performance. Environmental dynamics have a significant negative effect on the relationship between green innovation and sustainable performance. The results of this study offer important implications for MSMEs to be more concerned and increase green innovation to achieve sustainable performance.


Green Innovation; MSMEs; Sustainable Performance


Abbas, J. 2020. Impact of total quality management on corporate green performance through the mediating role of corporate social responsibility. J. Clean. Prod. 242, 118458.

Abdillah, W., Jogiyanto. 2015. Partial Least Square (PLS) Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dalam Penelitian Bisnis. Penerbit ANDI, Yogyakarta.

Aboelmaged, M. 2018. Direct and indirect effects of eco-innovation, environmental orientation and supplier collaboration on hotel performance: An empirical study. J. Clean. Prod. 184, 537–549.

Azadegan, A., Patel, P.C., Zangoueinezhad, A., Linderman, K. 2013. The effect of environmental complexity and environmental dynamism on lean practices. J. Oper. Manag. 31, 193–212.

BPS Kota Kediri. 2021. Kota Kediri dalam Angka 2021. BPS Kota Kediri, Kediri.

Ch’ng, P.C., Cheah, J., Amran, A. 2021. Eco-innovation practices and sustainable business performance: The moderating effect of market turbulence in the Malaysian technology industry. J. Clean. Prod. 283, 1–11.

Chan, H.K., Yee, R.W.Y., Dai, J., Lim, M.K. 2016. The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 181, 384–391.

Cheng, C.C.J., Yang, C.L., Sheu, C. 2014. The link between eco-innovation and business performance: A Taiwanese industry context. J. Clean. Prod. 64, 81–90.

Cuerva, M.C., Triguero-Cano, Á., Córcoles, D. 2014. Drivers of green and non-green innovation: Empirical evidence in Low-Tech SMEs. J. Clean. Prod. 68, 104–113.

Dania, W.A.P., Xing, K., Amer, Y. 2019. An integrated collaboration framework for sustainable sugar supply chains. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 8, 706–717.

El-Kassar, A.N., Singh, S.K. 2019. Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 144, 483–498.

Groß, M. 2018. Heterogeneity in consumers’ mobile shopping acceptance: A finite mixture partial least squares modelling approach for exploring and characterising different shopper segments. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 40, 8–18.

Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. 2011. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 19, 139–152.

Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M., Manolova, T.S. 2018. Internationalization and economic performance: The mediating role of eco-innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 171, 1312–1323.

IPCC. 2006. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Jiménez-Parra, B., Alonso-Martínez, D., Godos-Díez, J.L. 2018. The influence of corporate social responsibility on air pollution: Analysis of environmental regulation and eco-innovation effects. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 25, 1–13.

Junianto, D., Sabtohadi, J. 2020. Pengaruh Sistem Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Industri Pabrik Gula. Equilib. J. Ilm. Ekon. Manaj. dan Akunt. 9, 1–9.

Kunapatarawong, R., Martínez-Ros, E. 2016. Towards green growth: How does green innovation affect employment? Res. Policy 45, 1218–1232.

Lee, C.H., Wu, K.J., Tseng, M.L. 2018. Resource management practice through eco-innovation toward sustainable development using qualitative information and quantitative data. J. Clean. Prod. 202, 120–129.

Li, L., Msaad, H., Sun, H., Tan, M.X., Lu, Y., Lau, A.K.W. 2020. Green innovation and business sustainability: New evidence from energy intensive industry in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 1–18.

Liu, X., Zou, H., Ghauri, P. 2010. Technology Capability and the Internationalization Strategies of New Ventures. Organ. Mark. Emerg. Econ. 1, 100–119.

Mehralian, G., Nazari, J.A., Zarei, L., Rasekh, H.R. 2016. The effects of corporate social responsibility on organizational performance in the Iranian pharmaceutical industry: The mediating role of TQM. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 689–698.

Meng, M., Lei, J., Jiao, J., Tao, Q. 2020. How does strategic flexibility affect bricolage: The moderating role of environmental turbulence. PLoS One 15, 1–18.

Miao, C., Fang, D., Sun, L., Luo, Q. 2017. Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 126, 153–161.

Mun’im, A. 2012. Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Ketersediaan, Akses, Dan Penyerapan Pangan Terhadap Ketahanan Pangan Di Kabupaten Surplus Pangan: Pendekatan Partial Least Square Path Modeling. J. agro Ekon. 30, 41–58.

Pacheco, D.A. de J., Caten, C.S. ten, Jung, C.F., Navas, H.V.G., Cruz-Machado, V.A. 2018. Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs from emerging markets: Systematic literature review and challenges. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. - JET-M 48, 44–63.

Patel, P.C., Azadegan, A., Ellram, L.M. 2013. The effects of strategic and structural supply chain orientation on operational and customer-focused performance. Decis. Sci. 44, 713–753.

Pemerintah Kota Kediri. 2018. Peraturan Daerah Kota Kediri Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 Tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Daerah Kota Kediri Nomor 12 Tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Kota Kediri Tahun 2014-2019.

Raimi, L. 2017. Understanding theories of corporate social responsibility in the Ibero-American hospitality industry. Dev. Corp. Gov. Responsib. 11, 65–88.

Rezende, L. de A., Bansi, A.C., Alves, M.F.R., Galina, S.V.R. 2019. Take your time: Examining when green innovation affects financial performance in multinationals. J. Clean. Prod. 233, 993–1003.

Saeidi, Sayedeh Parastoo, Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, Sayyedeh Parisa, Saaeidi, S.A. 2015. How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. J. Bus. Res. 68, 341–350.

Sáez-Martínez, F.J., Díaz-García, C., Gonzalez-Moreno, A. 2016. Firm technological trajectory as a driver of eco-innovation in young small and medium-sized enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 138, 28–37.

Salisu, Y., Bakar, L.J.A. 2020. Technological capability, relational capability and firms’ performance: The role of learning capability. Rev. Gest. 27, 79–99.

Sehnem, S., Lazzarotti, F., Bencke, F.F. 2016. Sustainable practices and eco-innovations adopted by industrial companies. Int. J. Innov. 4, 42–58.

Seman, N.A.A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Saman, M.Z.M.S., Jooker, R.E., Ozkul, S. 2019. The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation on the Relationship between Green Supply Chain Management and Environmental Performance. J. Clean. Prod. 229, 115–127.

Suganthi, L. 2019. Examining the relationship between corporate social responsibility, performance, employees’ pro-environmental behavior at work with green practices as mediator. J. Clean. Prod. 232, 739–750.

Tariq, A., Badir, Y.F., Tariq, W., Bhutta, U.S. 2017. Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook. Technol. Soc. 51, 8–23.

TNP2K. 2020. Pemetaan Program Pemberdayaan Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM). Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan, Jakarta Pusat.

Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., Hariyati, H., Nafidah, L.N., Kustiningsih, N., Nadyaningrum, V. 2020. The role of green innovation between green market orientation and business performance: its implication for open innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 6, 1–18.

Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., Davia, M.A. 2013. Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecol. Econ. 92, 25–33.

Tsai, M.T., Chuang, L.M., Chao, S.T., Chang, H.P. 2012. The effects assessment of firm environmental strategy and customer environmental conscious on green product development. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184, 4435–4447.

Wu, W., Liu, Y., Chin, T., Zhu, W. 2018. Will green CSR enhance innovation? A perspective of public visibility and firm transparency. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 1–14.

Zailani, S., Govindan, K., Iranmanesh, M., Shaharudin, M.R., Sia Chong, Y. 2015. Green innovation adoption in automotive supply chain: The Malaysian case. J. Clean. Prod. 108, 1115–1122.




  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2023 Izzati Ardhan Firdausyi, Endah Rahayu Lestari, Wike Agustin Prima Dania

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.