Improved the growth and yield of rubber at mature period throught Iles-Iles (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) intercropping

Sahuri Sahuri

Abstract


Rubber plants that have produced can be improved through iles-iles farming. This study aims to determine the effect of the iles-iles rubber intercropping system on soil fertility, rubber growth, and latex yield. The study used a completely randomized block design (CRBD) with three replications. The treatment compared the rubber monoculture system with iles-iles rubber intercropping. The results showed that the cultivation of iles-iles as a rubber intercropping during the mature period of two years of observation did not inhibit the growth of rubber because it was not significantly different (P = 0.255) compared to the monoculture system but had a significant (P = 0.0013) effect on the latex yield. The BEP (Break Event Point) value of this farming system was achieved at the price of wet tubers of IDR 7.139 kg-1 with a production of 2.368 kg ha-1, while the value of the LER (Land Equivalent Ratio) in this farming system was 1.84.


Keywords


iles-iles; rubber growth; latex yield; rubber intercrops

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansil, P. N., Wills, P. J., Varun, R., & Latha, M. S. (2014). Cytotoxic and apoptotic activities of Amorphophallus campanulatus (Roxb.) Bl. tuber extracts against human colon carcinoma cell line HCT-15. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 21(6), 524-531.

As-syakur, A.R. (2009). Evaluasi zona agroklimat dari klasifikasi Schimidt-Ferguson menggunakan aplikasi Sistem Informasi Geografi (SIG). Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 3(1), 17-22.

Esekhade, T.U., Idoko, S.O., Osazuwa, Kore, I.K., & Mesike, C.S. (2014). Effect of intercropping on the gestation period of rubber. Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(8), 150-153.

Ferry, Y., Pranowo, D., & Rusli. (2013). The effect of intercropping on the growth of immature rubber in a gradual felling system. Buletin Riset Tanaman Industri, 4(3), 225-230.

Fikriati, M. (2010). Adaptation test of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) shade tolerance under rubber in rubber smallholder in Sarolangun District, Jambi. Skripsi Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia . http://repository.ipb.ac.id/jspui/bitstream/123456789/27130/6/Bab%20I%20Pendahulua n%20A10dpr-3.pdf.

Harijati, N., & Mastuti, R. (2014). Estimation of diverse porang (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) age in forest area based on brancing pattern of leaf petiolule. Research Journal of Life Science, 1(1), 20-25.

Hondrade, R.F., Edwin, H., Zheng, L., Elazegui, F., Lynne, J.A., Duque, E., Christopher, C.M., Casiana M.VC., & Garrett, K.A. (2017). Cropping system diversification for food production in Mindanao rubber plantations: a rice cultivar mixture and rice intercropped with mungbean. Peer Journal, 5, 1-20. DOI 10.7717/peerj.2975.

Jalloh, M. B. (2003). Modeling of solar radiation interception and biomass production in an intercropping system of rubber with banana and pineapple. PhD Thesis, University Putra Malaysia. http://webopac.upm.edu.my.

Kasno, A. (2008). Iles-iles umbi-umbian potensial sebagai tabungan tahunan. Buletin Palawija, 15, 15-20.

Khan. A., Rahman, M., & Islam, S. (2008). Antibacterial, antifungal, and cytotoxic activities of tuberous roots of Amorphophallus camphanulatus. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. Biology, 40(1), 41-44.

Khongdee, N., & Pansak, W. (2015). Effect of rubber intercropping on plant nutrients and soil moisture on slop land of Northern Thailand. Research & Innovation, 475-482. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283623721.

Mousavi, S. R., & Eskandari, H. (2011). A general overview on intercropping and its advantages in sustainable agriculture. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci., 1(11), 482-486.

Ogwuche, P., Umar, H. Y., Esekhade, T. U., & Francis, S. Y. (2012). Economies of intercropping natural rubber with arable crops: a panacea for poverty alleviation of rubber farmers. Journal of Agriculture Social Science, 8(3), 100–102.

Pansak, W. (2015). Assessing rubber intercropping strategies in Northern Thailand using the water, nutrient, light capture in agroforestry systems model. Kasetsart Journal, 49, 785−794.

Pathiratna, L. S. S., & Perera, M. K. P. (2006). Effect of competition from rubber (Hevea) on the yield of intercropped medicinal plants, Solatium virginianum Schrad., Aerva lanata (L.) Juss. Ex. Schult and Indigofera tinctoria L. Journal of the Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka, 87, 36-45.

Raintree, J. (2005). Intercropping with rubber for risk management, improving livelihoods in the Lao PDR. Agriculture and Forestry Research, (2): 41-46.

Rinojati, N. D., Putra, R. C., Afifah, E., & Muliawansyah, I. (2016). Analisis efisiensi usahatani pisang diantara tanaman karet: studi kasus di kebun Cibungur PTPN VIII Jawa Barat. Warta Perkaretan, 35(1), 37-48. https:??doi.org/10.22302/ppk.wp.v35i1.79.

Rodrigo, V. H. L., Silva, T. U. K., & Munasinghe, E.S. (2004). Improving the spatial arrangement of planting rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) for long-term intercropping. Field Crops Research, 89(2), 327-335.

Rodrigo, V.H.L., Stirling, C.M., Silvaa, T.U.K., & Pathiranaa, P.D. (2005). The growth and yield of rubber at maturity is improved by intercropping with banana during the early stage of rubber cultivation. Field Crops Research, 91 (2005) 23–33. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.05.005.

Romyen, A. Sausue, P., & Charenjiratragul, S. (2018). Investigation of rubber-based intercropping system in Southern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39, 135-142.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.12.002 2452-3151.

Rosyid, M. J. (2007). Pengaruh tanaman sela terhadap pertumbuhan karet pada areal peremajaan partisipatif di kabupaten sarolangun, Jambi. Jurnal Penelitian Karet, 25(2), 25-36.

Sahuri & Rosyid, M. J. (2015). Optimization of land between rubber rows using cayenne pepper (Capsicumfrutescens Linn.) as intercrops. Warta Perkaretan, 34(2), 77-88. ISSN : 0216 – 6062.

Sahuri. (2017). Development of corn (Zea mays L.) in immature rubber period. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 15(2), 113-126. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/akp.v15n2.2017.113-126 1.

Sahuri. (2019a). Technology of rubber-crop intercropping: constraints and opportunities of sustainable development. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, 38(1), 23-34. DOI: 10.21082/jp3.v38n1.2019.p23-34.

Sahuri, Cahyo, A. N., Ardika, R., Nugraha, I. S., Alamsyah, A., & Nurmansyah. (2019b). Modification of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) Spacing for Long-term Intercropping. Journal of Tropical Crop Science, 6(1), 50-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jtcs.6.01.50-59.

Sahuri. (2020). Improvement the growth and yield of rubber through rubber based intercropping system. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman (JPHT). Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman, 17(1), 27-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jpht.2020.17.1.27-40.

Santosa, E., Sugiyama, N., Nakata, M., & Lee, O. N. (2006). Growth and corm production of Amorphophallus at different shading levels in Indonesia. Japanese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 50 (2), 87-91.

Santosa, E. (2014). Development of intercropping iles-iles plants for the welfare of farmers and the independence of the national food industry. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 1(2), 73-79.

Snoeck, D., Lacote R., Lacrotte, R., Keli, Z. J., Doumbia, A., Chapuset, T., Jagoret, P., & Gohet, E. (2013). Association of hevea with other tree crops can be more profitable than hevea monocrop during first 12 years. Industrial Crops and Products, 43 : p. 578-586. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.07.053.

Sugiyama, N., Hikosaka, S., & Kawabata, S. (2003). Cultivation of Amorphophallus muelleri Blume in timber forests of East Java, Indonesia. Jpn. J. Trop. Agric., 47(3), 190–197.

Sumarwoto. (2005). Iles-iles (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume); description and other characteristics. Biodiversitas, 6(3), 185–190.

Tetteh, E.N., Abunyewa, A.A., Tuffour, H.O., Berchie, J.N., Acheampong, P.P., Ampofo, K.T., Dawoe, E., Logah, V., Agbenyega, O., Ennin, S.A., Nunoo, I., Melenya. C., Danquah, E.O., Barnes, V.R., & Partey, S.T. (2019). Rubber and plantain intercropping: Effects of different planting densities on soil characteristics. PLoSONE, 14(1), e0209260. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209260.

Tistama, R., Dalimunthe, C.I., Sembiring, Y.R.V., Fauzi, I.R., Hastuti, R.D., & Suharsono. (2016). Intercropping of shorgum and soybean for increasing of land productivity in rubber immature (Hevea brasiliensis Muell Arg). Indonesian Journal of Natural Rubber Research, 34(1), 61-76.

Wijayanto, N., & Pratiwi, E. 2011. The effect of shading from sengon stands (Paraserianthes falcataria (L) Nielsen) on the growth of porang plants (Amorphophallus onchophyllus). Jurnal Silvikultur Tropika, 2(1), 46-51.

Wijaya, T. (2018). Soil and climate suitability for rubber plantations. Warta Perkaretan, 27(2), 34-44.

Wirnas, D. (2007). Selection of Character Selection Based on Biometric and Molecular Analysis for Assembling Low Light Intensity Tolerant Soybeans. Disertation. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana. Insitut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. http://iirc.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/40547.

Xianhai, Z., Mingdao, C., & Weifu, L. (2012). Improving planting pattern for intercropping in the whole production span of rubber tree. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(34), 8484-8490.

Zakariyya, F., Puspitasari, N., & Prawoto, A. A. (2016). Various models of cocoa-rubber intercropping patterns. Warta Pusat Penelitian Kopi dan Kakao Indonesia, 28(1), 19-28.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/agrovigor.v16i2.10603

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Sahuri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

situs scatter hitam

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

POSTOTO787

POSTOTO787

EMAS787

EMAS787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

https://www.thedecliningwinter.com

ASIABET777

ASIABET777

https://mega888slots.com

https://www.thecarecommunity.com

https://mega888slots.com

diamond murah

voucher game

slot 4d