Reframing STEAM in Early Childhood Education: A Qualitative Study of Its Role in Fostering Social Competence in Indonesian Kindergarten Contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21107/njcr.v3i1.208Keywords:
STEAM education, Early childhood, Social competence, Collaborative learningAbstract
Background of the study: Although STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) is widely implemented in early childhood education to enhance cognitive and creative outcomes, its contribution to social competence remains underexplored, particularly in non-Western contexts. In Indonesian early childhood settings, STEAM practices largely prioritize measurable cognitive achievement, limiting recognition of its potential as a socially mediated learning approach.
Aims and scope of paper: This study aims to reconceptualize STEAM in ECE by examining how STEAM-based learning activities facilitate the development of social competence among children aged 5–6 years in an Indonesian kindergarten context.
Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was employed at Annahusada Kindergarten. Data were generated through prolonged classroom observations of group-based STEAM project activities, semi-structured interviews with classroom teachers, and analysis of children’s learning documentation. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis involving systematic coding, categorization, and interpretation of recurring interactional patterns. Credibility and trustworthiness were ensured through methodological triangulation across data sources and techniques.
Results: The findings indicate that STEAM learning, when structured as collaborative project-based inquiry, creates meaningful contexts for peer interaction and shared problem-solving. Three dominant dimensions of social competence emerged: cooperative behavior, communicative negotiation, and active participatory engagement. Empathic dispositions developed more progressively, particularly through role allocation, peer scaffolding, and task-related assistance. These findings position STEAM not solely as an interdisciplinary cognitive model but as a socio-constructivist learning ecology that supports interpersonal skill development.
Contribution: This study contributes to the expanding discourse on STEAM in early childhood education by reframing it as an integrative pedagogical approach that simultaneously advances cognitive and social developmental objectives. By providing empirical evidence from the Indonesian context, the study enriches global STEAM scholarship and offers practical implications for designing socially responsive and culturally grounded STEAM curricula in early learning environments.
References
Aslan, S., Alyuz, N., Li, B., Durham, L. M., Shi, M., Sharma, S., & Nachman, L. (2025). An early investigation of collaborative problem solving in conversational AI-mediated learning environments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100393
Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2015). School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 711–731. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015221
Bouanich, A., El Ghaziri, A., Santagostini, P., Pernet, A., Landès, C., & Bourbeillon, J. (2025). QuaDS: A qualitative/quantitative descriptive statistics Python module. SoftwareX, 30, 102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2025.102158
Campbell, F., Conti, G., Heckman, J. J., Moon, S. H., Pinto, R., Pungello, E., & Pan, Y. (2014). Early Childhood Investments Substantially Boost Adult Health. Science, 343(6178), 1478–1485. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248429
Cerovac, M., & Keane, T. (2025). Early insights into Piaget’s cognitive development model through the lens of the Technologies curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 35(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09906-5
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2025). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (Fifth edition). Sage.
De Souza, D. P., Greca, I. M., & Ferreira, H. S. (2025). From Collaboration to Integration: How a Community of Practice Supports Public School Teachers’ Understanding of Integrated STEAM Education. Education Sciences, 15(11), 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111559
Djam’an, N. (2025). Examining the implementation of environmental education in the STEAM approach for sustainability. Discover Education, 4(1), 410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00837-4
García, J. L., Heckman, J. J., Leaf, D. E., & Prados, M. J. (2020). Quantifying the Life-Cycle Benefits of an Influential Early-Childhood Program. Journal of Political Economy, 128(7), 2502–2541. https://doi.org/10.1086/705718
Gauvain, M. (2020). Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory. In Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development (pp. 446–454). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23569-4
Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: Implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
Ho, H.-J. (2025). Exploring the influence of affective perspective-taking on the emotional development of preschoolers. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101845
Kay, L., Putri, S., Dewi, F., Buxton, A., & Buyani, T. (2025). STEAM-ECE: Developing a STEAM Approach for Early Childhood Education in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education Studies, 14(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijeces.v14i2.33363
Kim, H. Y., LaRusso, M. D., Hsin, L. B., Harbaugh, A. G., Selman, R. L., & Snow, C. E. (2018). Social perspective-taking performance: Construct, measurement, and relations with academic performance and engagement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 57, 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.05.005
Li, J., Luo, H., Zhao, L., Zhu, M., Ma, L., & Liao, X. (2022). Promoting STEAM Education in Primary School through Cooperative Teaching: A Design-Based Research Study. Sustainability, 14(16), 10333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610333
Malti, T., & Dys, S. P. (2018). From being nice to being kind: Development of prosocial behaviors. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.036
Morell, T. (2018). Multimodal competence and effective interactive lecturing. System, 77, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.12.006
Nadlifah, & Latif, M. A. (2024). Creative Freedom and Holistic Growth: Implementation of the STEAM Approach in Islamic Early Childhood Education. Golden Age: Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 9(4), 689–702. https://doi.org/10.14421/jga.2024.94-09
Nguyen, M. T., Ha, T. A., Mai, H. A., Vu, K. T. T., & Nguyen, M. Q. (2025). Factors affecting preschool teachers implementation of STEAM activities: A quantitative study in Vietnam. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11, 101227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101227
Oanh, D. T. K., & Dang, T. D. H. (2025). Effect of STEAM Project-Based Learning on Engineering Students’ 21st Century Skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(3), 705–721. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.3.705
Ouyang, F., Tang, Z., Cheng, M., & Chen, Z. (2023). Using an integrated discourse analysis approach to analyze a group’s collaborative argumentation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101227
Revak, I. M., Csernoch, M., Szilagyi, K. C., David, A., Toth, B. K., Malmos, E., Suto, E., & Kurucz, D. (2024). A systematic review of STEM teaching learning methods and activities in early childhood. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(8), em2481. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14779
Spyropoulou, N., & Kameas, A. (2023). Augmenting the Impact of STEAM Education by Developing a Competence Framework for STEAM Educators for Effective Teaching and Learning. Education Sciences, 14(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010025
Supianti, I. I., Yaniawati, P., Bonyah, E., Hasbiah, A. W., & Rozalini, N. (2025). STEAM approach in project-based learning to develop mathematical literacy and students’ character. Infinity Journal, 14(2), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i2.p283-302
Susanti, S., Hidayat, Y., & Sarip, S. K. (2025). Pengaruh Penggunaan Metode STEAM Terhadap Perkembangan Kognitif Anak Usia 4-5 Tahun di Kober Al Hidayah. Al-ATHFAL: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 6(3), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.46773/alathfal.v6i3.2276
Thuneberg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yulianti, E., Suwono, H., Abd Rahman, N. F., & Phang, F. A. (2024). State-of-the-Art of STEAM Education in Science Classrooms: A Systematic Literature Review. Open Education Studies, 6(1), 20240032. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2024-0032
Zhou, Q., Suraworachet, W., & Cukurova, M. (2024). Detecting non-verbal speech and gaze behaviours with multimodal data and computer vision to interpret effective collaborative learning interactions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 1071–1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12315-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aisyatuz Zahrah, Nur Alfin Mazidah, Nur Aini, Rany Oktavia R., K. M. N. T. K. Bandara, Ricardo F. Uy Jr, Hanandita Veda Saphira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
