Analysis of Elementary School Students’ Science Literacy in Learning Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS)

Siti Hartina, Meirza Nanda Faradita, Kunti Dian Ayu Afiani

Abstract


This study aims to analyse the scientific literacy skills of elementary school students in learning Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS) with a focus on four indicators, which are understanding basic scientific concepts (content knowledge), critical thinking and inquiry skills (scientific inquiry), the ability to apply scientific concepts in a social context (contextual application), and scientific attitudes. The research method used is descriptive qualitative with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation. Observations were conducted to observe learning activities, while interviews were conducted with teachers and principals to find out their responses regarding students' scientific literacy. The results of the study indicate that students' understanding of basic scientific concepts is quite good, especially when learning uses a practical approach and is based on the context of everyday life. Students' critical thinking and inquiry skills still need to be improved, especially in terms of asking questions and formulating hypotheses. Students' ability to apply scientific concepts to a social context shows positive results, especially through project activities that are relevant to the surrounding environment. Students' scientific attitudes, such as curiosity, are starting to develop, but attitudes of accuracy and precision still require further development. The conclusion of this study is that elementary school students' scientific literacy can be improved through inquiry-based learning methods, projects, and experiments involving real-life contexts and active guidance from teachers. This study recommends strengthening learning programs that encourage critical thinking, scientific attitudes, and the application of science in everyday life.

Keywords


Scientific Literacy; Elementary School; Science Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angelia, Y., Supeno, S., & Suparti, S. (2022). Keterampilan proses sains siswa sekolah dasar dalam pembelajaran ipa menggunakan model pembelajaran inkuiri. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5), 8296-8303.

Aprilia, P. W., Suryanti, S., & Suprapto, N. (2021). Pembelajaran inkuiri untuk melatih literasi sains siswa pendidikan dasar. Jurnal MUDARRISUNA: Media Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(2), 250-268.

Ayurachmawati, P., & Widodo, A. (2016). Analisis kemampuan inkuiri siswa di sekolah dasar. EduHumaniora| Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 8(2), 217-227.

Babchuk, W. A. (2017). Book review: Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, by SB Merriam and EJ Tisdell.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.

Demir, C. G. (2020). An overview of project-based learning practices within the context of 21st century skills. Paradigm Shifts in 21st Century Teaching and Learning, 36-52.

Dewi, N. L., & Prasetyowati, D. (2023). Analisis Hasil Asesmen Diagnostik Pada Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Dan Sosial Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(2), 4979-4994.

Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1088-1107.

Harlen, W. (Ed.). (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education. Association for science education.

İdil, Ş., Gülen, S., & Dönmez, İ. (2024). What Should We Understand from PISA 2022 Results?. Journal of STEAM Education, 7(1), 1-9.

Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2014). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 227-247). Routledge.

Kvale, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.

Latif, A., Pahru, S., & Muzakkar, A. (2022). Studi Kritis Tentang Literasi Sains dan Problematikanya di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(6), 9878-9886.

Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71-94.

Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (2000). Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future. King's College London, School of Education.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd.

Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks.

National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Nbina, J., & Obomanu, B. J. (2010). The meaning of scientific literacy: A model of relevance in science education. Academic Leadership: The Online Journal, 8(4), 70.

Neutzling, M., Pratt, E., & Parker, M. (2019). Perceptions of learning to teach in a constructivist environment. Physical Educator, 76(3), 756-776.

Nurhanifah, A., & Utami, R. D. (2023). Analisis Peran Guru dalam Pembudayaan Literasi Sains pada Siswa Kelas 4 Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 6(2), 463-479.

Obe, W. H. (2018). The teaching of science in primary schools. David Fulton Publishers.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing.

Perry, S. B. (2020). Project-based learning. The students’ guide to learning design and research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks. org/studentguide/project-based_learning.

Programme international pour le suivi des acquis des élèves. (2017). PISA 2015 Results: Excellence and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing.

Putri, A. F., Naila, I., & Afani, K. D. A. (2023). Pengembangan media Google Sites berbasis ethno sains pada mata pelajaran IPAS sekolah dasar. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 7(3), 433-442.

Rahma, S. R., Faradita, M. N., & Afiani, K. D. A. A. A. (2024). Penerapan Metode Proyek untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses IPAS Sekolah Dasar kelas V pada Kurikulum Merdeka: Penerapan Metode Proyek untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses IPAS Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Perseda: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 7(3), 231-241.

Ramadhan, W. (2023). Pembelajaran Berbasis Pendekatan Steam Melalui Project-Based Learning (Pjbl) Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ibriez: Jurnal Kependidikan Dasar Islam Berbasis Sains, 8(2), 171-186.

Roberts, D. A. (2000). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices.

Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henrikson, H., & Hemmo, V. 6.9 Pri-Sci-Net–An FP7 EU funded Project Promoting Inquiry-based Learning in Science at Primary Level of Education. PROFILES, 86(1), 296.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2015). Strengthening the heartbeat: Leading and learning together in schools. John Wiley & Sons.

Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The Use of Scientific Literacy Taxonomy for Assessing the Development of Chemical Literacy Among High-School Students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203-225.

Suparya, I. K., Suastra, I. W., & Arnyana, I. B. P. (2022). Rendahnya literasi sains: faktor penyebab dan alternatif solusinya. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 9(1), 153-166.

Thuneberg, H., Salmi, H., Vainikainen, M. P., Hienonen, N., & Hautamäki, J. (2022). New curriculum towards Big ideas in science education. Teachers and Teaching, 28(4), 440-460.

Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Teaching Science, 53(4), 14-17.

Widoretno, S. (2022, September). Tantangan Menggunakan Literasi Sain dalam Pembelajaran. In SEMBIO: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 104-111).

Yuenyong, C., & Narjaikaew, P. (2009). Scientific literacy and Thailand science education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 335-349.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Siti Hartina; Meirza Nanda Faradita; Kunti Dian Ayu Afiani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Widyagogik : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar 
by Universitas Trunojoyo Madura is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN 2541-5468 (Online)  and ISSN 2303-307X(Print) 
Email: widyagogik@trunojoyo.ac.id

Indexed by: