Abstentions in 2014 and 2019 Indonesian elections: Case study of pro-democracy activists

M Syaeful Anam, Gumilar Rusliwa Somantri


This article discusses how the dynamics of the abstentions phenomenon among pro-democracy activists in the 2014-2019 general election in Indonesia. While pro-democracy activists have increasingly chosen “struggle within”, there are still critical groups that have voted for abstentions in 2014-2019 general election. Charles Tilly’s concept of collective action and contentious politics is used in this study. This study uses a qualitative approach to the type of case study research. Researchers explore data through in-depth interviews as primary data and secondary data is extracted through library research. The analysis is carried out with the abstractive inductive logic. This research shows that abstentions are contentious collective actions. The abstentions movement was born from a network of pro-democracy activists who have been engaged in advocacy work. Abstentions carried out in protest against the authorities and the boycott of the election. The boycott choice is contentious politics.


abstentions; pro-democracy activists; elections; collective action; contentious politics

Full Text:



Almlund, P. (2018). Non-voting young people in conflict with the political system. Journal of Political Power, 11(2), 230-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2018.1477630

Amenta, E. (2005). Political context, challenger strategies, and mobilization: Explaining the impact of the Thownsend Plan. In D. S. Meyer, V. Jennes & H. M. Ingram (eds.), Routing the opposition: Social movement, public policy and democracy. The University of Minnasota Press.

Arahjuang (2014). Komite politik alternatif lawan pemilu 2014: Bangun partai alternative. (http://www.arahjuang.com/2014/03/11/komite-politik-alternatif-lawan-pemilu-2014-bangun-partai-alternatif/), accessed in 10 April 2020.

Buehler, M. (2007). Local elite reconfiguration in post-new order Indonesia: The 2005 election of district government heads in South Sulawesi. Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs, 40(1), 119-147.

Bennet, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.

Birch, S., & Dennison, J. (2019). How protest voters choose. Party Politics, 25(2), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817698857

Blais, A., et.al. (2019). Was my decision to vote (or abstain) the right one? Party Politics, 25(3), 382-389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817722058

Budiman, A., & Tornquist, O., (eds.). (2001). Aktor demokrasi: Catatan tentang gerakan perlawanan di Indonesia. ISAI (Institut Arus Studi Informasi).

Detik. (2019). Megawati yang golput itu pengecut, tak usah jadi WNI. (https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-tengah/d-4491225/megawati-yang-golput-itu-pengecut-tak-usah-jadi-wni), accessed in 29 February 2019.

Drone Emprit. (2019). Politik di media social. LP3ES Jakarta.

Facchini, F., & Jaeck, L. (2019). Ideology and the rationality of non-voting. Rationality and Society, 12(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463119841033

Feddersen, T. J., & Pesendorfer, W. (1999). Abstention in elections with asymmetric information and diverse preferences. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 381-298.

Heryanto, A. (2019). Setengah abad golput. Tempo.

Huntington, S. P., & Nelson, J. (1980). Partisipasi politik di negara berkembang. Rineka Cipta.

Jackson, K. D., & Pye, L. W. (1978). Political power and communication in Indonesia. University of California Press.

Jatam. (2019). Oligarki tambang di balik pilpres 2019, (https://www.jatam.org/2019/03/20/oligarki-tambang-di-balik-pilpres-2019/), accessed in 16 October 2019.

Kang, W. (2004). Protest voting and abstention under plurality rule elections: An alternative public choice approach. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 16(1), 79-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629804038903

Katz, G., & Levin, I. (2018). A general model of abstention under compulsory voting. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(3), 589-508. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.49

Kompas, (2019). Wiranto ingatkan mereka yang mengajak golput pada pemilu 2019. (https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/03/27/15473811/wiranto-ingatkan-mereka-yang-mengajak-golput-pada-pemilu-2019), accessed in 29 February 2020.

Kumparan. (2019). Golput yang tak pernah redup. (https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/golput-yang-tak-pernah-redup-1549259580724886695), accessed in 10 April 2020.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (2019). Golput. Kompas, 12 Maret.

Lane, M. (2014). Unfinished nation. Djaman Baroe.

Mietzner, M. (2009). Indonesia’s 2009 elections: Populism, dynasties and consolidation of the party system. Lowy Institute.

Mietzner, M., & Aspinall, E. (2010). Problems of democratization in Indonesia: An overview. In E. Aspinall & M. Mietzner (eds.), Problem of democratization in Indonesia: Elections institutions and society. ISEAS.

Obradovic-Wochnik, J., & Wochnik, A. (2014). Invalid ballots and the “crisis of representative democracy”: Re-inventing protest at the 2012 Serbian elections. East European Politics and Societes and Cultures, 20(10), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325414547430

Plane, D. L., & Gershtenson, J. (2004). Candidates’ ideological locations, abstention, and turnout in the U.S. midterm senate elections. Political Behavior, 26(1), 69-93. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POBE.0000022344.05382.b4

Power, T. J., & Robert, J. T. (1995). Compulsory voting invalid ballots, and abstention in Brazil. Political Research Quaterly, 48(3), 135-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299504800407

Ricklefs, M. C. (2008). Sejarah Indonesia modern 1200-2008. Serambi Ilmu Semesta.

Robinson, R., & Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Reorganizing power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of market. Routledge.

Rumah Pemilu. (2019). KPU tetapkan hasil perolehan suara, angka tidak sah pada pileg tinggi. (https://rumahpemilu.org/kpu-tetapkan-hasil-perolehan-suara-angka-suara-tidak-sah-pada-pileg-tinggi/), accessed in 10 May 2020.

Sanit, A. (1992). Golput: Aneka pandangan dan fenomena politik. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Suara Papua. (2013). KNPB: Kami golput pada pemilu 2014. (https://suarapapua.com/2013/08/07/knpb-kami-golput-pada-pemilu-2014/), accessed in 10 April 2020.

Superti, C. (2015). Vanguard of discontent: Comparing individual blank voting, mobilized protest voting, and voting abstention. Harvard University Press.

Superti, C. (2016). The blank and null vote: An alternative form of democratic protest? Harvard University Press.

Tapsell, R. (2018) Kuasa media di Indonesia: Kaum oligarki, warga dan revolusi digital. Marjin Kiri.

Tarrow, S. G. (1998). Power in movement. Cambridge University Press.

Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. University of Michigan.

Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements: 1768-2004. Paradigm Publishers.

Tirto. (2019). KontraS catat 17 purnawirawan terlibat pelanggaran ham di masa lalu. (https://tirto.id/kontras-catat-17-purnawirawan-terlibat-pelanggaran-ham-di-masa-lalu-dlWz), accessed in 16 October 2019.

Uhlin, A. (1997). Oposisi berserak: Arus deras demokratisasi gelombang ketiga di Indonesia. Mizan.

Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy and democracy. The American Interest, 2(2), 18-27.

Yuniarti, S. (2009). Golput dan pemilu di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 6(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v6i1.519

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v3i1.7307


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 M. Syaeful Anam, Gumilar Rusliwa Somantri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Simulacra has been indexed in these prominent indexing services:

Sinta 2DOAJIndex CopernicusEBSCOGoogle ScholarCrossrefDimensionsWorldcatHarvard LibraryOxford LibraryUniversiteit LeidenDRJIScilit MDPIPKP IndexROADBASEMorarefColumbia LibrarySheffield LibraryCORE


 Simulacra is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA and published by the Center for Sociological Studies and Community Development, Department of Sociology, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia.