Reactive-pragmatic activism: The trend and pattern of Indonesia’s Generation Z digital movement

Cep Deni Muchlis, A. Bakir Ihsan, Mohammad Hasan Ansori, Ismail Suardi Wekke

Abstract


This study aims to explore the manner in which Generation Z (Gen Z) engages with socio-political activities in the digital sphere, where the swift dissemination of information influences the nature and intensity of collective actions. The findings indicate that Gen Z's responses to socio-political issues are generally expressed in two paradoxical mainstreams: apolitical tendencies (political alienation) and political tendencies (political activism), each of which exhibiting distinct variations. To examine this phenomenon, the study mainly employs a semi-systematic literature review (semi-SLR), analyzing 40 curated articles from an initial pool of 200 Scopus-indexed publications (2020–2025). The selection process adhered to a rigorous semi PRISMA-based framework. The methodological analysis reveals that Gen Z's engagement with socio- political phenomena tends to intensify as these issues predominantly gain attention on social media (the digital realm). However, this intensification has not consistently resulted in substantive political change. Indeed, at a certain juncture, Gen Z movements remain in what Dahrendorf termed as the "quasi- group" phase, which potentially evolves into a highly responsive collective action when triggered by pragmatic and significant issues. This phenomenon is referred to as a reactive-pragmatic activism, a form of activism motivated by the pursuit of immediate results without an ideological foundation.


Keywords


gen z, reactive-pragmatic activism, digital activism, democracy, conflic theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altahmazi, T. H. (2020). Collective pragmatic acting in networked spaces: the case of #activism in Arabic and English twitter discourse. Lingua, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102837

Amin, M., Ritonga AD., Situmorang TP., & Santoso AD. (2025) Revolutionizing political participation: a modified utaut model for Generation Z in the digital era. Front. Polit. Sci, 7:1681050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1681050

Arafat, Md. Y., Mia, Md. S., Imran, Md. I. H., Islam MD. R. (2025). Reflection from uprising: the role of youth and social media in political movement in Nepal and Indonesia. International Journal and Social Science Studies, 1(3), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.60153/ijesss.v1i3.242

Azedi, A. (2025). From shared grievances to collective action: a multilevel study of economic adversity and protest. International Sociology, 40(1), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809241292076

Bart, C. (2021). The new-new social movements: is social media changing the ontology of social movements?. The London School of Economics and Political Science, 26(3), 343-358. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-26-3-343

Bräuchler, B., (2025). Golden Indonesia 2045: neoliberal development policies and environmental journalism. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 45(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034251345832

Cabinet Secretary of The Republic of Indonesia. (2025, August 30). President Prabowo Subianto and Islamic Leaders unite in Hambalang: call for calm and unity. https://setkab.go.id/en/president-prabowo-subianto-and-islamic-leaders-unite-in-hambalang-call-for-calm-and-unity

Cabinet Secretary of The Republic of Indonesia. (2025, August 30). President Prabowo, Party Leaders discuss stability amid mass protests. https://setkab.go.id/en/president-prabowo-party-leaders-discuss-stability-amid-mass-protests/

Cabinet Secretary of The Republic of Indonesia. (2025, August 29). President Prabowo expresses condolences, instructs to investigate demonstration incident. https://setkab.go.id/en/president-prabowo-expresses-condolences-instructs-to-investigate-demonstration-incident/

Chenoweth, E., & Cebul, M. (2026). Why gen-z is rising. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2026.a977940

Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design. Sage Publications.

Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy. Yale University Press.

Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Standford University Press.

Earl, J., Maher, T. V., & Pan, J. (2022). The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism: a synthetic review. Science Advance, 8, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl8198

Fahmi, I. (2025, September). Peta netizen tentang aksi demo 25 Agustus 2025. https://pers.droneemprit.id/peta-netizen-tentang-aksi-demo-25-agustus-2025/

Fominoya, C. F. (2022). Reconceptualizing democratic innovation “democratic innovation repertoires” and their impact within and beyond social movements. Democratic Theory, 9(2), 78-100. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2022.090205

Galperin, J. U. (2017). Trust me, i’m a pragmatist: a partially pragmatic critique of pragmatic activism. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 42(2), 425-495. https://doi.org/10.7916/cjel.v42i2.3738

Gitomer, A., Atienza-Barthelemy, J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2026). Youth activism and (de)personalized remix on TikTok. Social Movement Studies, 25(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2024.2415672

Hasan, N. B. (2025). Gen-Z uprising in the global south: challenging traditional political mobilization and reshaping civic culture. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 8(10), 7978-7985. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i10-52

Hasugian, A., Komalasari, K., & Sundawa, D. (2025). From digital dissent to political change: social media’s impact on Nepal’s 2025 protests. Media Asia, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2025.2578665

Highfield, T., & Miltner, K. M. (2023). Platformed solidarity: Examining the performative politics of Twitter hashflags. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 29(6), 1641-1667. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231199981

Hunger, S., & Hutter, S. (2025). Introduction: Europe’s changing protest landscape. Journal of European Public Policy, 32(8), 1861-1873. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2025.2517891

Indriyani, I. I. (2024). Gen z’s ethical approaches in crisis communication on social media: evidences of Indonesia. Malaysia Journal of Communication, 40(4), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2024-4004-08

Ipsos. What Worries Indonesia? HI 2025. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2025-10/WHAT%20WORRIES%20INDONESIA_H1%202025.pdf

Islam, M. A., Nur, S., Mahmud, I., Rakiv, M., Noor, R. N.,& Moniruzzaman, Md.(2025). Gen z’s digital uprising in Bangladesh: the role of social media in the fall of a political despot. Elsevier Ltd, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102181

Jakimovska,K.,&Koscak,M.(2025).Isitprotest or policy? What are young people saying that mainstream parties refuse to hear?. European View, 24(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/17816858251386957

Jalli, N. (2025, September 24). From anime to activism: how the ‘one piece” pirate flag became the global emblem of gen z resistance. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/from-anime-to-activism-how-the-one-piece-pirate-flag-became-the-global-emblem-of-gen-z-resistance-265526

Jerkov, A., Bešlin, M., & Radeljić, B. (2025). The depoliticization of protest: understanding the 2024/2025 Serbian students’ uprising. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2583748

Kavada, A., & Poell, T. (2021). From counter publics to contentious publicness: tracing the temporal, spatial, and material articulations of popular protest through social media. Communication Theory, 31(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa025

Lane, Max (2026, Mar 27). Indonesia’s August- September 2025 mass arrests: what do they reflect?. Fulcrum. https://fulcrum.sg/indonesias-august-september-2025-mass-arrests-what-do-they-reflect/

Lertchoosakul, K. (2021). The white ribbon movement: high school students in the 2020 Thai youth protests. Critical Asian Studies, 53(2), 206-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2021.1883452

Literat, I., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2023). TikTok as a Key Platform for Youth Political Expression: Reflecting on the Opportunities and Stakes Involved. Social Media + Society, 9(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231157595

Miedner, M. (2012). Indonesia’s democratic stagnation: anti-reformist elites and resilient civil society. Democratization, 19(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.572620

Muhtadi, B., Alicia. Warburton, E. A., Gammon, L. (2025). Complacent democrats: the political preferences of gen z Indonesians. Journal of East Asian Studies, 25(2) 259-286. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2025.10011

Muncie, E. (2020). ‘Peaceful protesters’ and ‘dangerous criminals’: the framing and reframing of anti-fracking activists in the UK. Social Movement Studies, 19(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1708309

Oser, J. (2022). Protest as one political act in individuals’ participation repertoires: latent class analysis and political participant types. American Behavioral Scientist, 66(4), 510-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211021633

Osman, O. (2026). Beyond technological optimism: why legacy and digital journalism converge in protest coverage. African Journalism Studies, 47(1) 118-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2025.26 10205

Petrusenko, N. (2025). Echoes of revolution in protest art: historical narratives and youth mobilization in Russia (2008–2012). The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 52(2),194-220. https://doi.org/10.30965/18763324-bja10116

Pickard, S., Bowman, B., & Arya, D. (2020). “We are radical in our kindness”: the political socialisation, motivations, demands and protest actions of young environmental activists in britain. Youth and Globalization 2, 2(2), 251-280. https://doi.org/10.1163/25895745-02020007

Poel, T., & Vidjk, J. van. (2015). Social media and activist communication. Routledge, 527-537. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717241

Prasetyawan, W. (2025, September). A birdlike flock moving without a leader: social networks and economic pressures in the 2025 Indonesia demonstrations. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, https://kyotoreview.org/issue-41-sept-2025/social-networks-and-economic-pressures-in-the-2025-indonesia-demonstrations/

Ratcliffe, R. (2025, September 1). Indonesia protests: president scraps lawmakers’ perks in bid to calm tensions. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian. com/world/2025/sep/01/indonesia-protests-president-prabowo-subianto-scraps-lawmakers-perks

Romero-Vidal, X., & Talukder, D. (2025). From boomers to zoomers: generational shifts in drivers of satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe. Democratization, 32(6), 1541–1564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2025.2476180

Saveleva, I. V. (2023). Reactive pragmatic models in non-professional internet discourse. Virtual Communication & Social Network, 3(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-4799-2024-3-1-47-59

Suwana, F. (2020). What motivates digital activism? The case of the Save KPK movement in Indonesia. Information. Communication & Society, 23(9), 1295–

https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1563205

Sorce, G., & Dumitrica, D. (2022). Transnational dimensions in digital activism and protest. Review of Communication, 22(3), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2107877

Shamim, S. (2025, Desember 19). Who was Sharif Osman Hadi; why is Bangladesh on fire over his death?. Aljaeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/19/ who-was-osman-hadi-why-is-bangladesh-on-fire-over-his-death

Shaikh, E. (2025, Mei 8). Gen Z social media usage statistics. Simple Been. https://simplebeen.com/gen-z-social-media-usage-statistics/

Sloam, J., Pickard, S., & Henn, M. (2022). ‘Young people and environmental activism: the transformation of democratic politics.’ Journal of Youth Studies, 25(6), 683–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2056678

Taneerat, W., & Dongnadeng, H. A. (2024). Digital political trends and behaviors among Generation Z in Thailand. Center for Southeast Asian Studies, 13(3), 521-545. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.13.3_521

Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: observations from tahrir square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x

Thapa, S. B. (2026). The global wave of gen z activism: impact on democratic institutions and international relations. Lex Localis, 24(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.52152/vmg5ty84

Tsevreni, I., Proutsos, N., Tsevreni, M., & Tigkas, D. (2023). Generation Z worries, suffers and acts against climate crisis— the potential of sensing children’s and young people’s eco-anxiety: a critical analysis based on an integrative review. Climate, 11(8), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11080171

Van de Velde, C. (2023). ‘What have you done to our world?’: the rise of a global generational voice. International Sociology, 38(4), 431-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809231180880

Venus, A., Intyaswati, D., Ayuningtyas, F., & Lestari, P. (2025). Political participation in the digital age: impact of influencers and advertising on Generation Z. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2520063

Walsh, T. (2024). Tiktok as a site of social protest in Iran’s gen-z uprising. Discourse & Society, 35(5), 625-650. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265241234351




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v9i1.33629

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2026 Cep Deni Muchlis, A. Bakir Ihsan, Mohammad Hasan Ansori, Ismail Suardi Wekke

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Simulacra has been indexed in these prominent indexing services:

DOAJIndex CopernicusEBSCOSinta 2Google ScholarCrossrefDimensionsWorldcatHarvard LibraryOxford LibraryUniversiteit LeidenDRJIScilit MDPIPKP IndexROADBASEMorarefColumbia LibrarySheffield LibraryCORE

 

 Simulacra is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA and published by the Center for Sociological Studies and Community Development, Department of Sociology, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia.