Digitizing zines: Spreading resistance discourses in the digital era

Muhammad Fakhran al Ramadhan; Biko Nabih Fikri Zufar; Elise Imray Papineau

doi:10.21107/sml.v8i2.31558

Digitizing zines: Spreading resistance discourses in the digital era

Muhammad Fakhran al Ramadhan, Biko Nabih Fikri Zufar, Elise Imray Papineau

Abstract

Zines are grassroots publications that have long served as media of cultural and political resistance, traditionally circulated in material form within relatively small and tightly bound communities. With the advent of the internet, however, the scope and visibility of zines have expanded well beyond spatial and temporal boundaries, reducing production costs while simultaneously amplifying the reach of counter- hegemonic discourses. This study investigates how zines operate simultaneously as subject and as power within digital contexts, drawing conceptually on Michel Foucault’s theory of knowledge and power to frame the analysis. A mixed-methods design was employed, with 85 zines purposively selected from a population of 568 titles, determined through the Slovin formula with a 10% margin of error. Data were examined through a narrative approach, supported by AI-assisted text analysis, allowing for both qualitative interpretation and systematic computational support. The findings reveal that digital environments not only reinforce the omnipresence, omniscience, and omnipotence of resistance discourses but also transform the dynamics of knowledge production, positioning zines as effective vehicles for disseminating counter-discourses. By operating as both disseminators of resistance (subject) and as agents shaping collective truths (power), zines highlight the shifting relationship between grassroots media and structures of authority. Limitations and recommendations for future research are also discussed.

Keywords

zines; resistance discourse; digital era; Foucault; power relations

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmad, P. M., Hikami, I., Zufar, B. N. F., & Syahfrullah, A. (2021). Digital labour: Digital capitalism and the alienation of YouTube content creators. Journal of Asian Social Science Research, 3(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.15575/jassr.v3i2.44

Akmal, H. A., & Coulton, P. (2018). Using heterotopias to characterise interactions in physical/digital spaces. Design Research Society Conference, 1, 269–278. https://doi.org/10.21606/dma.2018.348

Baker, S., & Cantillon, Z. (2022). Zines as community archive. Archival Science, 22(4), 539–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09388-1

Bennett, A. (2022). The Bloomsbury handbook of popular music and youth culture. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Berry, D. M. (2011). The philosophy of software: Code and mediation in the digital age. Palgrave Macmillan.

Bold, M. R. (2017). Why diverse zines matter: A case study of the People of Color Zines Project. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-017-9533-4

Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.

Castro-Gómez, S., Kopsick, K., & Golding, D. (2023). Michel Foucault and the coloniality of power. Cultural Studies, 37(3), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2021.2004435

Chubb, J., Cowling, P., & Reed, D. (2022). Speeding up to keep up: Exploring the use of AI in the research process. AI & Society, 37(4), 1439–1457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01259-0

Clark, T., Foster, L., Bryman, A., & Sloan, L. (2021). Bryman’s social research methods. Oxford University Press.

Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300252392

Creamer, E. (2023). From margin to center: The design implications of cultural component with mixed methods: Section 5 introduction. In C. N. Poth (Ed.), The Sage handbook of mixed methods research design. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682663

Creasap, K. (2014). Zine-making as feminist pedagogy. Feminist Teacher, 24(3), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.5406/femteacher.24.3.0155

Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ekundayo, T., Khan, Z., & Nuzhat, S. (2024). Evaluating the influence of artificial intelligence on scholarly research: A study focused on academics. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024(1), 8713718. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8713718

Etengoff, C. (2015). Using zines to teach about gender minority experiences and mixed-methods research. Feminist Teacher, 25(2–3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.5406/femteacher.25.2-3.0211

Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.

Foucault, M. (2008). Of other space. In M. Dehaene & L. De Cauter (Eds.), Heterotopia and the city: Public space in a postcivil society (p. 18). Routledge.

Foucault, M. (2010). The government of self and others (M. Foucault, Ed.). St. Martin’s Press.

Foucault, M. (2012). Arkeologi pengetahuan. GillPress.

GillPress. (2023). Average screen time statistics for 2023. What’s The Big Data. https://elitecontentmarketer.com/screen-time-statistics/

Gordon, C. (Ed.). (1980a). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.

Gordon, C. (Ed.). (1980b). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=RKa4AAAAIAAJ

Harcourt, B. E. (2021). Five modalities of Michel Foucault’s use of Nietzsche’s writings (1959–73): Critical, epistemological, linguistic, alethurgic and political. Theory, Culture & Society, 40(1–2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276421994916

Hirsch, E. D. (1967). Validity in interpretation. Yale University Press.

Hofkirchner, W. (2021). Digital humanism: Epistemological, ontological and praxiological foundations. In P. Verdegem (Ed.), AI for everyone? (pp. 33–48). University of Westminster Press.

Köbis, N., Starke, C., & Rahwan, I. (2022). The promise and perils of using artificial intelligence to fight corruption. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(5), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00489-1

Lee, K. S., & Wei, H. (2020). Social media as heterotopia: Applying Foucault’s concept of heterotopia to analyze interventions in social media as a networked public. Archives of Design Research, 33(2), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2020.05.33.2.5

Legendre, I. (2023). Margins in motion: Towards a political history of zine culture.

Mamik. (2015). Metodologi kualitatif. Zifatama Publisher.

Manca, T. (2024). “Vaccines protect both you and your newborn:” A discourse analysis of risk and uncertainty in information about vaccination in pregnancy. Social Science & Medicine, 117, 526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117526

Nijsten, N. (2017). Unruly booklets: Resisting body norms with zines. DiGeSt: Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies, 4(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.11116/digest.4.2.5

Ollerenshaw, J. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2002). Narrative research: A comparison of two restorying data analysis approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004008003008

Perlman, D. (2025). Strategic matters: Apparatuses, sub-individuals, and anthropological slumber. Foucault Studies, 37, 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1353/fou.00006

Portschy, J. (2020). Times of power, knowledge and critique in the work of Foucault. Time & Society, 29(2), 392–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X20911786

Presner, T. (2010). Digital humanities 2.0: A report on knowledge. Citeseer.

Putra, F. F. (2023). Budaya zine dan kemunculan anarkisme di Indonesia. Punk & Resilience, 1(0). https://doi.org/10.1386/punk.6.2.189_1

Radway, J. (2016). Girl zine networks, underground itineraries, and Riot Grrrl history: Making sense of the struggle for new social forms in the 1990s and beyond. Journal of American Studies, 50(1), 1–31.

Robinson, L. (2018). Zines and history: Zines as history. Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526120601.00010

Rossi, S., Rossi, M., Mukkamala, R. R., Thatcher, J. B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024). Augmenting research methods with foundation models and generative AI. International Journal of Information Management, 77, 102749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102749

Scheper, J. (2023). Zine pedagogies. The Radical Teacher, 125, 20–32.

Schubert, K. (2020). Freedom as critique: Foucault beyond anarchism. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 47(5), 634–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720917733

Stangler, D., & Maxwell, K. (2012). DIY producer society. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 3–10.

Statista. (2023). Average daily time spent using various media and devices in Indonesia in 3rd quarter 2023, by activity. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/803524/daily-time-spent-using-online-media-by-activity-indonesia/

Swara, E. B., Zahra, B. N., Zufar, B. N. F., & Ahmad, P. M. (2023). Bagaimana sosial media menghancurkanmu. Penerbit Semut Api.

Tong, K. (2020). DIY print activism in digital age: Zines in Hong Kong’s social movements. Zines, 1(1), 65–76.

Watson, A., & Bennett, A. (2021). The felt value of reading zines. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 115–149. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00108-9

Way, L. (2024). Exploring older punk women’s conceptualisation of ‘punk’ through participant-created zine pages. In L. Way & M. Grimes (Eds.), Punk, ageing and time (pp. 177–199). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47823-9_10

Wright, F. A. (2001). From zines to ezines: Electronic publishing and the literary underground (Doctoral dissertation). Kent State University, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Zufar, B. N. F., & Airlangga, S. A. (2021). Gejayan Memanggil: Social solidarity in the social movement of the digital age. Komunitas, 13(2), 108–118.

Zufar, B. N. F., & Sari, E. K. (2021). The other space of social media: Concept study of heterotopia on Instagram. Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika, 16(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.20473/jsd.v16i1.2021.12-23

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v8i2.31558

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Simulacra has been indexed in these prominent indexing services:

Simulacra is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA and published by the Center for Sociological Studies and Community Development, Department of Sociology, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia.