_-_Barcode.png "e-ISSN")
Networked power and resistance in agrarian conflicts: A case study from Malin Deman, Indonesia
Abstract
The agrarian conflict in Malin Deman District, Mukomuko Regency, Indonesia, highlights persistent inequalities in land tenure, pitting local farmers against plantation companies and state institutions to reclaim ancestral land. Using a qualitative single case study approach, this study examines the power dynamics and social network structures that shape the conflict. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with civil society organizations involved in land advocacy and secondary sources, including agrarian reports, legal documents, and investigative news articles. Findings show that dominant actors-plantation companies and the regional government-exercise power through coercion, economic incentives, and control over legal narratives. Social network analysis indicates that the regional government has the highest degree of centrality and betweenness centrality, positioning it as a mediator and gatekeeper between corporate-government alliances and farmer advocacy groups. However, smallholder farmers remain marginalized, with limited access to information and decision-making processes. This study highlights the need for inclusive land governance and network-based mediation strategies to strengthen community bargaining power. Increasing transparency, promoting equitable policymaking and ensuring participatory mechanisms are critical to resolving agrarian conflicts in an equitable and sustainable manner. By addressing structural inequalities and empowering marginalized communities, this research contributes to the broader discourse on land rights and conflict resolution strategies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afrizal. (2015). Third-party intervention in terminating oil palm plantation conflicts in Indonesia: A structural analysis. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 30(1), 141–172. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24779832
Alves, H., Brito, P., & Campos, P. (2021). Centrality measures in interval-weighted networks. Journal of Complex Networks, 10(4), cnac031. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.10016
Andriani, E. (2017). Analisis sumber pendapatan petani kelapa sawit. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 16(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.16.2.145-154
Anggriawan, R. P., Sutaryono, S., & Salim, M. N. (2021). Penyelesaian konflik penguasaan tanah HGU dengan masyarakat di Bengkulu Utara. Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan, 1(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.31292/jm.v1i1.2
Angst, M., & Huber, M. N. (2023). Who is satisfied with their inclusion in polycentric sustainability governance? Networks, power, and procedural justice in Swiss wetlands. Policy Studies Journal, 52(1), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12515
Astuti, R. (2021). Governing the ungovernable: The politics of disciplining pulpwood and palm oil plantations in Indonesia’s tropical peatland. Geoforum, 124, 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.03.004
Batubara, A. A., & Sinaga, R. P. K. (2022). Peran organisasi dalam aksi sosial masyarakat tani (studi pada serikat petani wilayah Sumatera Utara). Jurnal Kajian Agraria dan Kedaulatan Pangan (JKAKP), 1(1), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.32734/jkakp.v1i1.8301
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Brad, A., & Hein, J. (2022). Towards transnational agrarian conflicts? Global NGOs, transnational agrobusiness and local struggles for land on Sumatra. New Political Economy, 28(3), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2022.2138300
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bunce, B., Hornby, D., & Cousins, B. (2024). Navigating the contradictory dynamics of production and social reproduction in collectively owned agricultural enterprises in South Africa’s land reform. Journal of Agrarian Change, 24(3), e12585. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12585
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Chalil, D., Sidique, S. F., & Barus, R. (2019). Sertifikasi minyak sawit petani: Dampak terhadap pembangunan dan penghidupan berkelanjutan. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 18(2), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.18.2.343-358
Conceição, K. V., Chaves, M. E. D., Picoli, M. C. A., Sánchez, A. H., Soares, A. R., Mataveli, G. A. V., Silva, D. E., Costa, J. S., & Camara, G. (2021). Government policies endanger the indigenous peoples of the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy, 108, 105663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105663
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dauvergne, P. (2018). The global politics of the business of “sustainable” palm oil. Global Environmental Politics, 18(2), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00455
Dell’Angelo, J., Navas, G., Witteman, M., D’Alisa, G., Scheidel, A., & Temper, L. (2021). Commons grabbing and agribusiness: Violence, resistance and social mobilization. Ecological Economics, 184, 107004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107004
Deo, V. S. (2021). Redressal or reconciliation? Situating caste politics amidst the ongoing farmer agitation. Economic and Political Weekly. https://www. proquest.com/magazines/redressal-reconciliation-situating-caste-politics/docview/2559599463/se-2
Dewan Perwakilan Daerah. (2023, July 29). Sultan minta Kajati dan BPN Bengkulu dalami anatomi konflik agraria antara PT DDP dan kelompok tani Mukomuko. https://www.dpd.go.id/daftar-berita/sultan-minta-kajati-dan-bpn-bengkulu-dalami-anatomi-konflik-agraria-antara-pt-dds-dan-kelompok-tani-mukomuko
Disney, A. (2020). Social network analysis: Understanding centrality measures. Cambridge Intelligence. Retrieved September 17, 2024, from https://cambridge-intelligence.com/keylines-faqs-social-network-analysis/
Engström, L., Bélair, J., & Blache, A. (2022). Formalising village land dispossession? An aggregate analysis of the combined effects of the land formalisation and land acquisition agendas in Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 120, 106255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106255
Hariandja, R. (2025, February 12). Reforma agraria bakal makin sulit? Mongabay Indonesia. Retrieved November 17, 2024, from https://www.mongabay.co.id/2025/02/12/reforma-agraria-bakal-makin-sulit/
Harian Radar Mukomuko. (2023, August 1). Simak! Ini penjelasan BPN soal take over HGU BBS ke DDP. radarmukomuko.disway.id. Retrieved October 13, 2024, from https://radarmukomuko.disway.id/read/663226/simak-ini-penjelasan-bpn-soal-take-over-hgu-bbs-ke-ddp
Harlina, R., Fatimah, S., & Setiawan, I. (2018). Analisis jaringan komunikasi risiko petani bawang merah: Studi kasus kelompok tani Rindu Alam Desa Cikawao, Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 17(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.17.2.197-206
Hernández-Cedeño, I., Nelson, P. F., & Angles-Hernández, M. (2021). Social and environmental conflict analysis on energy projects: Bayesian predictive network approach. Energy Policy, 157, 112515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112515
Human Rights Watch. (2021, June 3). “Mengapa tanah kami?” Ekspansi perkebunan kelapa sawit di Indonesia membahayakan lahan gambut dan penghidupan masyarakat. Retrieved October 18, 2024, from https://www.hrw.org/id/report/2021/06/03/378784
Infonegeri. (2023, July 26). Konflik agraria di Mukomuko berlarut, Menteri ATR/BPN dan Kejati Bengkulu cari solusi. infonegeri.id. Retrieved October 13, 2024, from https://infonegeri.id/2023/07/26/konflik-agraria-di-mukomuko-berlarut-menteri-atr-bpn-dan-kejati-bengkulu-cari-solusi/
Ioris, A. A. R. (2020). Indigenous labor and land resources: Guarani–Kaiowa’s politico–economic and ethnic challenges. Resources, 9(7), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9070084
Johnson, C. A., Kramarz, T., McBurney, M., & Oscco, Y. M. (2023). Accumulation through destabilization: Manufacturing indigenous consent for industrial mining in Latin America. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 51(6), 1409–1427. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2023.2287107
Juniyanti, L., Purnomo, H., Kartodihardjo, H., Prasetyo, L. B., Suryadi, & Pambudi, E. (2021). Powerful actors and their networks in land use contestation for oil palm and industrial tree plantations in Riau. Forest Policy and Economics, 129, 102512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102512
Kansanga, M. M., Dinko, D. H., Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H., Arku, G., & Luginaah, I. (2021). Scalar politics and black markets: The political ecology of illegal rosewood logging in Ghana. Geoforum, 119, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.12.020
Kapgen, D., & Roudart, L. (2023). A multidisciplinary approach to assess smallholder farmers' adoption of new technologies in development interventions. The European Journal of Development Research, 35(4), 974–995. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-022-00548-8
Kimengsi, J. N., Mairomi, H. W., Forje, G. W., Kometa, R. N., & Abam, C. E. (2023). Power and conviction dynamics on land and linked natural resources: Explorative insights from the Greater South region of Cameroon. GeoJournal, 88(5), 4625–4643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-023-10884-9
Kisekka-Ntale, F. (2024). Institutions as images of political authority and power hierarchies: Understanding land tenure dynamics of state-making in Zimbabwe and Uganda. Journal of Land and Rural Studies, 12(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/23210249231212102
Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria. (2024, February 27). Konflik agraria di Indonesia tertinggi dari enam negara Asia. www.kpa.or.id. Retrieved November 2, 2024, from https://www.kpa.or.id/2024/02/27/konflik-agraria-di-indonesia-tertinggi-dari-enam-negara-asia/
Krott, M., Bader, A., & Schusser, C. (2014). Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community-based forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012
Latupeirissa, A., Sediyono, E., & Iriani, A. (2019). Pemanfaatan social network analysis untuk menganalisis kolaborasi komunikasi pada balai perikanan budidaya laut Ambon. JSINBIS (Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis), 9(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol9iss2pp121-132
Nurrochmat, D. R., Boer, R., Ardiansyah, M., Immanuel, G., & Purwawangsa, H. (2020). Policy forum: Reconciling palm oil targets and reduced deforestation: Landswap and agrarian reform in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 119, 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102291
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A theory of access. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
Rozak, A., Kartini, D. S., & Djuyandi, Y. (2020). Strategi survivalitas warga dan politik survivalitas aktor politik pada konflik pertambangan. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 11(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.11.1.2020.53-75
Sahnan, S., Arba, M., & Suhartana, L. W. P. (2019). Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 7(3), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i3.714
Santos, J. G., & Ioris, A. A. R. (2024). Water conflicts and socioterritorial dynamics: The hydrosocial cycle after the São Francisco River transposition project in the northeast of Brazil. Land, 13(12), 2032. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122032
Senoaji, G., Hidayat, M. F., & Iskandar, I. (2020). Characteristics of forest farmers and tenurial conflicts resolution in Rimbo Donok Protection Forest, Kepahiang District, Bengkulu Province. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 19(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.19.2.241-254
Sibuea, H. Y. P. (2024). Penanganan kejahatan mafia tanah di Indonesia. Info Singkat: Kajian Singkat Terhadap Isu Aktual dan Strategis, 16(15). https://berkas.dpr.go.id/pusaka/files/info_singkat/Info%20Singkat-XVI-15-I-P3DI-Agustus-2024-215.pdf
Singh, T., Singh, P., & Dhanda, M. (2021). Resisting a “digital green revolution”: Agri-logistics, India’s new farm laws and the regional politics of protest. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 32(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2021.1936917
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
Suciati. (2016). Perlindungan hukum terhadap petani dalam menggapai negara kesejahteraan (welfare state). Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan, 1(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.21067/jmk.v1i2.1532
Suharto, M. P., & Basar, G. K. (2019). Konflik agraria dalam pengelolaan tanah perkebunan pada PT Hevea Indonesia (PT Hevindo) dengan masyarakat Kecamatan Nanggung Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 1(1), 1–70. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v1i1.20893
Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
van Leeuwen, M., Mathys, G., de Vries, L., & van der Haar, G. (2020). From resolving land disputes to agrarian justice – Dealing with the structural crisis of plantation agriculture in eastern DR Congo. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 49(2), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1824179
Wang, Y., Schaub, S., Wuepper, D., & Finger, R. (2023). Culture and agricultural biodiversity conservation. Food Policy, 120, 102482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102482
Wayessa, B. S. (2022). Sweeteners are not always sweet: The social and economic consequences of the growing demand for sugar in Ethiopia. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-022-00063-y
Xu, H., Xu, W., Li, X., Han, J., Han, C., & Song, L. (2023). Dynamic game and simulation for low carbon development of industrial land under the Chinese decentralization: A case study in Beijing Tianjin Hebei region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(21), 60777–60804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26559-4
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zhou, D., Zhao, X., Li, P., Jin, F., Li, S., Li, H., & Wang, J. (2024). Assessing territorial space conflicts in the coastal zone of Wenzhou, China: A land–sea interaction perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 926, 171826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171826
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v8i1.29382
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Febby Fattarawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simulacra has been indexed in these prominent indexing services:
Simulacra is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA and published by the Center for Sociological Studies and Community Development, Department of Sociology, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia.
