_-_Barcode.png "e-ISSN")
The paradox influence of peer groups on online gambling behavior of students at the Islamic university in Indonesia
Abstract
The prevalence of online gambling among college students is increasing due to its accessibility and the significant influence of the social environment. One important element that can both encourage and discourage people from participating in this activity is peer groups. Previous research has tended to focus on only one aspect of peer group influence, and there aren't many studies that thoroughly address the multiple roles that peers play in students' online gambling decisions. Using Albert Bandura's social learning theory, this study attempts to examine how peer group social dynamics influence college students' online gambling behaviors. Using a qualitative approach, this study conducted in-depth interviews with 28 Islamic university students from different social contexts and observed their online gambling activities. The results showed that students in the peer group who gambled experienced a process of observation, retention, reproduction, and social reinforcement that increased their engagement. In contrast, students in the non-gambling peer group received negative reinforcement and social support to refrain from the behavior. These findings support the importance of peer-based prevention strategies. Therefore, campuses and stakeholders need to strengthen student communities that instill anti-gambling values and provide positive and educational alternative activities.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adu-Akoh, P. J. (2023). Motivational factors of sports betting and the preponderance of problem gambling severity among university students: A pragmatic evidence. London Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 23(12), 43–58. https://journalspress.uk/index.php/LJRHSS/article/view/270
Amoah-Nuamah, J., Agyemang-Duah, W., Mensah, B., & Opoku, B. (2023). University students’ reasons and attitudes towards online gambling and its implication on their lives. Journal of Gambling Studies, 39(1), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-022-10143-5
Bandura, A. (1969). Social learning theory of identificatory process. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 212–262). Houghton Mifflin Co.
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Vicarious reinforcement and imitative learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(6), 601–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045550
Buchanan, T. W., McMullin, S. D., Baxley, C., & Weinstock, J. (2020). Stress and gambling. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 31, 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.09.004
Bush, R., Russell, A. M. T., Staiger, P. K., Waling, A., & Dowling, N. A. (2021). Risk and protective factors for the development of gambling-related harms and problems among Australian sexual minority men. BMC Psychology, 9(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00597-4
Caillon, J., Grall-Bronnec, M., Perrot, B., Leboucher, J., Donnio, Y., Romo, L., & Challet-Bouju, G. (2019). Effectiveness of at-risk gamblers’ temporary self-exclusion from internet gambling sites. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35(2), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9782-y
Chóliz, M., Marcos, M., & Lázaro-Mateo, J. (2021). The risk of online gambling: A study of gambling disorder prevalence rates in Spain. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19(2), 404–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00067-4
Curnow, D. (2021). Why do I need to steal? In D. Curnow (Ed.), The psychology of embezzlement: The art of control and intervention (pp. 61–91). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74439-7_4
Debarliev, S., Jovanovska-Ivanovska, A., Šimkus, O., & Zupan, B. (2022). What can education bring to entrepreneurship? Formal versus non-formal education. Journal of Small Business Management, 60(1), 219–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1700691
Delfabbro, P., Belle, G.-F., Neven, R., Dora, D. H., & Derevensky, J. (2021). Attitudes toward gambling in young people: A cross-national study of Australia, Canada, Croatia and Israel. International Gambling Studies, 21(2), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2021.1883708
Dougherty, M. V. (2021). The use of confidentiality and anonymity protections as a cover for fraudulent fieldwork data. Research Ethics, 17(4), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211018257
Filade, B. A., Bello, A. A., Uwaoma, C. O., Anwanane, B. B., & Nwangburuka, K. (2019). Peer group influence on academic performance of undergraduate students in Babcock University, Ogun State. African Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.30918/aerj.72.19.010
Gavrilets, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2017). Collective action and the evolution of social norm internalization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(23), 6068–6073. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703857114
Gürbüzer, N., & Gürcan-Yıldırım, D. (2025). Behavioral addictions and psychological distress: Insights from psychology students in Eastern Turkey. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 290. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04623-3
Hariyadi, S., Nugraheni, E., Antika, E., & Afriwilda, M. (2023). How common is online game use addiction? A prevalence and motives study among undergraduate students. European Journal of Psychological Research, 10(4). https://www.idpublications.org/ejpr-vol-10-no-4-2023/
Hing, N., Hannah, T., Lisa, L., Kerry, S., Nicole, H., & Rockloff, M. (2023). Influences on gambling during youth: Comparisons between at-risk/problem, non-problem and non-gambling adolescents in Australia. Journal of Youth Studies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2024.2378288
Järvenoja, H., Törmänen, T., Lehtoaho, E., Turunen, M., Suoraniemi, J., & Edwards, J. (2025). Investigating peer influence on collaborative group members’ motivation through the lens of socially shared regulation of learning. British Journal of Psychological Education, 93(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12754
Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Beseler, C. L. (2024). The impact of youth digital citizenship education: Insights from a cluster randomized controlled trial outcome evaluation of the Be Internet Awesome (BIA) curriculum. Contemporary School Psychology, 28(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-023-00465-5
Juma, S., & Pandelaere, M. (2024). Trapped in hope: The negative impact of hope on gambling decisions. Current Psychology, 43(2), 1911–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04376-9
Kaakinen, M., Sirola, A., Savolainen, I., & Oksanen, A. (2020). Impulsivity, internalizing symptoms, and online group behavior as determinants of online hate. PLOS ONE, 15(4), e0231052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231052
Khalid, M. N. A., & Lida, H. (2021). Objectivity and subjectivity in games: Understanding engagement and addiction mechanism. IEEE Access, 9, 65187–65205. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3075954
Khozin, K., Tobroni, T., & Rozza, D. S. (2024). Implementation of Albert Bandura’s social learning theory in student character development. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary, 3(1), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.38035/ijam.v3i1.543
Kou, Y. (2020). Toxic behaviors in team-based competitive gaming: The case of League of Legends. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY ’20). https://doi.org/10.1145/3410404.3414243
Låftman, S. B., Modin, B., Olsson, G., Sundqvist, K., Svensson, J., & Wennberg, P. (2020). School ethos and adolescent gambling: A multilevel study of upper secondary schools in Stockholm, Sweden. BMC Public Health, 20, Article 8230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8230-y
Lee, D., & Lee, B. (2020). The role of multilayered peer groups in adolescent depression: A distributional approach. American Journal of Sociology, 125(6), 1513–1558. https://doi.org/10.1086/709425
Lewiandy, L., Gunadi, A., & Putra, E. T. (2024). The prohibition of online gambling in Indonesia: A law and economic analysis. Indonesian Law Review, 14(2). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ilrev/vol14/iss2/3
Lim, L., & Wang, V. X. (2023). Framing slogans for responsible gambling campaigns: A tale of two models. Healthcare, 11(20), 2754. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11202754
Lim, W. M. (2024). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Lozano, J. M. G., & Rodríguez, F. M. M. (2022). Systematic review: Preventive intervention to curb the youth online gambling problem. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(11), 6402. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116402
Malik, G., Singh, D., & Bansal, R. (2024). Exploring the complex dynamics: Examining the influence of deviant personas in online gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 40(3), 1271–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-024-10301-x
Ozer, E. M. (2022). Albert Bandura (1925–2021). American Psychologist, 77(3), 483–484. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000981
Pisarska, A., & Ostaszewski, K. (2020). Factors associated with youth gambling: Longitudinal study among high school students. Public Health, 184, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.017
Pitt, H., McCarthy, S., Randle, M., Arnot, G., Daube, M., & Thomas, S. (2024). “It’s changing our lives, not for the better. It’s important that we have a say”: The role of young people in informing public health and policy decisions about gambling marketing. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 2004. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19331-x
Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK). (2024). Gawat! Jumlah fantastis usia anak main judi online. https://www.ppatk.go.id/news/read/1373/gawat-jumlah-fantastis-usia-anak-main-judi-online.html
Reitz, A. K., Zimmermann, J., Hutteman, R., Specht, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2014). How peers make a difference: The role of peer groups and peer relationships in personality development. European Journal of Personality, 28(3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1965
Riley, B. J., Oster, C., Rahamathulla, M., & Lawn, S. (2021). Attitudes, risk factors, and behaviours of gambling among adolescents and young people: A literature review and gap analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030984
Rumjaun, A., & Narod, F. (2020). Social learning theory—Albert Bandura. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory (pp. 85–99). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_7
Sanscartier, M. D., Ellery, J. D., & Keough, M. T. (2020). Attitudes towards gambling in a Canadian university sample of young adults. International Gambling Studies, 20(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2019.1649448
Savolainen, I., Oksanen, A., Kaakinen, M., Sirola, A., Zych, I., & Paek, H.-J. (2021). The role of online group norms and social identity in youth problem gambling. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106828
Savolainen, I., Sirola, A., Kaakinen, M., & Oksanen, A. (2019). Peer group identification as determinant of youth behavior and the role of perceived social support in problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9813-8
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Siricharoen, N. (2024). Cultivating critical minds: Interdisciplinary strategies for empowering university students against online gambling propaganda. Community and Social Development Journal, 23(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.57260/csdj.2024.266169
Sirola, A., Savela, N., Savolainen, I., Kaakinen, M., & Oksanen, A. (2021). The role of virtual communities in gambling and gaming behaviors: A systematic review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 37(1), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-020-09946-1
Xu, W., & Zammit, K. (2020). Applying thematic analysis to education: A hybrid approach to interpreting data in practitioner research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920918810
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v8i1.29326
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Abrori, Muhammad Azza Ramadhan, Aris Sugianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simulacra has been indexed in these prominent indexing services:
Simulacra is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA and published by the Center for Sociological Studies and Community Development, Department of Sociology, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia.
