The binary of gender-based spaces in schools: A heterotopia study in Yogyakarta
Abstract
This study aims to explore how schools legitimize public as gender based power spaces. This research uses a qualitative approach, aspecially caes study methode. This research uses the theory of the heterotopia concept by Michel Foucault. Research findings indicate that there is gender-based spatial polarization, particularly in engaging in activities outside class hours. The hall, aisle, and canteen are predominantly occupied by male students, while the classrooms are mostly occupied by female students. Masculinity as a gender role taught to male students makes them more familiar with activities and relationships in public spaces. The traits of dominance and bravery make male students more comfortable socializing in their surroundings, allowing them to enjoy their breaktime in the hall and corridor. Meanwhile, femininity as a gender role taught to female students, makes them more at ease spending their break time in the classroom, because the classroom is the only space they posses personally. So, the responsibility of caring for and maintaining the classroom is also more heavily borne by female student. Schools legitimize space as a landscape that forms a binary relationship between private and public spaces. This polarization also emphasizes how schools serve as a platform to prevent individuals from becoming deviant and crisis actors.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Awwaliyah, F. A., & Arcana, I. M. (2019). Pembentukan indeks mutu pendidikan (IMP) di Indonesia tahun 2018 dan faktor yang memengaruhinya. Seminar Nasional Official Statistics 2019: Pengembangan official Statistics Dalam Mendukung Implementasi SDG’s, 385–396.
Chowdhury, S. (2019). Understanding heterotopia: Foucault’s spatial context to society. Rethinking Public Spaces: Stories of Antiquity & Rejuvenation of Modernity.
Connell, R. , W. (2005). Maculinities 2nd edition (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
Cunningham, C., Hill, S., & Zhang, W. (2022). Gender equality and educational leadership in Chinese schools. Power and Education, 14(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438211058965
Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (2016). Shaping school culture fieldbook third edition. Jossey Bass a Wiley Imprint.Efendy, R. (2014). Kesetaraan gender dalam pendidikan. Jurnal Al-Maiyyah, 7(2), 142–165.
Foucault, M. (1984). Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias. Diacritics, 16(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/464648
Ghaill, M. M. A. (1999). Schooling, masculine identities and culture. In school culture. Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
Idhom, M. A. (2018, September 11). Di balik pengaduan aturan wajib jilbab SMPN 8 Yogya ke Ombudsman. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/di-balik pengaduan-aturan-wajib-jilbab-smpn-8-yogya-ke-ombudsman-cX7l
Idris, F., Hassan, Z., Ya’acob, A., Gill, S. K., & Awal, N. A. M. (2012). The role of education in shaping youth’s national identity. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.299
Imam, Z., & Bano, S. (2015). Patriarchy, for education: Counter discourse and negotiation for rights. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 22(2), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521515574608
Jung, C. G. (2003). Aspects of the feminine. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315832104
Koseoglu, S., Ozturk, T., Ucar, H., Karahan, E., & Bozkurt, A. (2020). 30 years of gender inequality and implications on curriculum design in open and distance learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.553
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International Limited Publisher.
Labaree, D. F. (2022). The fraught connection between state and school. Phi Delta Kappan, 104(4), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221142982
Lee, M., & Louis, K. S. (2019). Mapping a strong school culture and linking it to sustainable school improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.02.001
Löw, M. (2006). The social construction of space and gender. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806062751
Mamnoun, S., & Nfissi, A. (2023). Investigating classroom interaction from a gender perspective: A comprehensive review of relevant studies. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 5(2), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.32996/jweep.2023.5.2.3
Marinda, L. (2020). Teori perkembangan kognitif jean piaget dan problematikanya pada anak usia Sekolah Dasar. An-Nisa’: Jurnal Kajian Perempuan dan Keislaman, 13(1), 116–152. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v13i1.26
Massey, D. (2000). Space, place, and gender. In gender space architecture: An interdisciplinary introduction. Routledge.
Prioletta, J. (2020). Patriarchy in the preschool classroom: Examining the effects of developmental ideologies on teachers’ perspectives and practices around play and gender. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 21(3), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949119831461
Prissor, J. (1999). School culture. Paul Chapman Publisher Ltd.
Rendell, J. (2000). Gender and space. In Gender space architecture: An interdisciplinary introduction. Routledge.
Rodríguez-Martínez, C., & Calvo, G. (2014). Gender and positive social interaction at school: A proposal based on the culture of peace and the capability approach. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.285
Satu Data Indonesia. (2023). Indeks pendidikan berdasarkan provinsi di Indonesia. https://Data.Jabarprov.Go.Id/Api-Backend/Bigdata/Bps/Od_15044_indeks_pendidikan__prov_di_indonesia_v2?Download=csv.
Shilling, C. (1991). Social space, gender inequalities and educational differentiation. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 12(1), 23–44.
Simpson, R. (2014). Gender, space and identity: Male cabin crew and service work. Gender in Management, 29(5), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-12-2013-0141
Sitinjak, R. H. I., & Jong, S. de. (2007). Studi implementasi konsep ruang heterotopia pada interior Gereja Katolik Tritunggal Mahakudus Tukadalung Bali. Dimensi Interior, 5(1), 12–22.
Smith, E., & Andersen, I. G. (2022). Do same-gender peers in the classroom have heterogeneous impacts on male and female students. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221105378
Sreenivas, D. (2023). The gender studies classroom: Its promise and discontents. Sociological Bulletin, 72(4), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380229231196755
Subrahmanian, R. (2005). Gender equality in education: Definitions and measurements. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.04.003
Sudradjat, I. (2012). Foucault, the other spaces, and human behaviour. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.004
Terrence, D. A., & Kent, P. D. (2016). Shaping school culture. Jossey Bass.
Trautner, M. N., Hoffman, J., & Borland, E. (2022). Periods, penises, and patriarchy: Perspective taking and attitudes about gender among middle school, high school, and college students. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221100378
Wagh, A. C. (2022). Bringing back the ‘classroom’: Feminist pedagogy in a sociology classroom. Society and Culture in South Asia, 8(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/23938617211047630
Wahyudi, R., & Nugroho, H. (2022). Mengaburnya ruang publik dan ruang privat dalam praktik konsumsi media baru. Jurnal Komunikasi, 16(2), 101–112.
Walby, S. (2014). Teorisasi patriarkhi. Jalasutra.Wilkinson, L., & Pearson, J. (2009). School culture and the well-being of same-sex attracted youth. Gender & Society, 23(4), 542–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209339913
Winther, H. (2023). Gendered spaces and practices. In Gender diversity, equity, and inclusion in academia (pp. 222–231). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003363590-24
Wisarja, I. K., & Sudarsana, I. K. (2017). Refleksi kritis ideologi pendidikan konservatisme dan liberalisme menuju paradigma baru pendidikan. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 1(4), 283. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i4.11925
Woodzicka, J. A., Mallett, R. K., & Melchiori, K. J. (2020). Gender differences in using humor to respond to sexist jokes. Humor, 3(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2019-0018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v7i2.27385
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Sasiana Gilar Apriantika, Muhamad Supraja, Fina Itriyati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simulacra has been indexed in these prominent indexing services:
Simulacra is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA and published by the Center for Sociological Studies and Community Development, Department of Sociology, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia.