What is love? Love from sociological perspectives and queer love in Indonesia
Abstract
Love is a narrative that takes a defined form, even in lived experiences. This raises the question of whether same-sex love that follows the traditional romance narrative can be rightfully considered queer. Arab Muslims live in a society strongly tied to Islamic restrictions where the subject of homosexuality is strictly forbidden and considered taboo. The ideal of being loved and loving someone almost universally aspired to. This paper examines the definition of love, provides insight into the perspectives on love from sociologists Durkheim, Marx, Sorokin, and Parson, and analyzes queer love in Indonesia. Through four short narratives, this study aims to gain a deeper understanding of love for both heterosexual and homosexual individuals. The research employs a qualitative method, and the interviews were limited to four participants aged between 35 and 45 from Jakarta. The study affords participants considerable freedom in answering the provided questions. I conduct interviews at various locations such as shopping malls, restaurants, and coffee shops, following the interviewees' preferences. For privacy reasons, pseudonyms are used for all names mentioned in this paper.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Bayati, H. S. H. (2020). Out of the closet: Queer love in Arabic literature and Islamic society. International Journal of Science and Research, 9(12), 966-973.
Ambert, A. M., Adler, P. A., Adler, P., & Detzner, D. F. (1995). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(4).
Ansara, Y. G., & Hegarty, P. (2012). Cisgenderism in psychology: Pathologising and messengering children from 1999 to 2008. Psychology & Sexuality, 3, 137-160.
Aumer, K. (Ed.). (2016). The psychology of love and hate in intimate relationships. Springer.
Bellah, R. N. (1999). Max Weber and world-denying love: A look at the historical sociology of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 67(2), 277-304.
Belsey, C. (1994). Desire: Love stories in western culture. Blackwell.
Berlant, L. (2012). Desire/love. Dead Letter Office.
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). A little bit about love. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction. Academic Press.
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Brown, L. S. (1989). New voices, new visions: Toward a lesbian/gay paradigm for psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 445-458.
Buckingham-Hatfield, S. (2000). Gender and environment. Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993). Critically Queer. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 1(1), 17-32.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Coontz, S. (2006). Marriage, a history: How love conquered marriage. Penguin.
Corbetta, P. (2003). Social research: Theory, methods and techniques. Sage Publications.
De Cecco, J. P. (1981). Definition and meaning of sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 6, 51-67.
Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1996). Cultural perspectives on romantic love. Personal Relationships, 3(1), 5-17.
Durkheim, É. (1897). La prohibition de l’inceste et ses origines. L’Année sociologique, 1, 1-70.
Fisher, H. (2004). Why we love: The nature and chemistry of romantic love. Henry Holt & Company.
Foucault, M. (1998). The history of sexuality: 1. Penguin.
Goode, W. J. (1959). The theoretical importance of love. American Sociological Review, 24(1), 38-47.
Greenfield. S. M. (1965). Love and marriage in modern America: A functional analysis. The Sociological Quarterly, 6(4), 361–377.
Halperin, D. M. (2003). The normalization of queer theory. Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 339-343.
Halperin, D. M. (2019). Queer Love. Critical Inquiry, 45(2), 396-419.
Hatfield, E., Mo, Y-M., & Rapson, R. LL (2015). Love, sex, and marriage across cultures. The Oxford handbook of human development and culture: An interdisciplinary perspective, edited by Lene Arnett Jensen, 570-585. Oxford University Press.
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392-402.
Iorio, G. (2014). Sociology of love: The agapic dimension of societal life. Vernon Press.
Illouz, E. (1997). Consuming the romantic utopia: Love and the cultural contradictions of capitalism. University of California Press.
Jagose, A. (1996). Queer theory: An introduction. New York University Press.
Jankowiak, W. R., & Fischer, E. F. (1992). A cross-cultural perspective on romantic love. Ethnology, 31(2), 149-155.
Karandashev, V. (2017). Romantic love in cultural contexts. Springer International Publishing.
Karandashev, V. (2019). Cross-cultural perspectives on the experience and expression of love. Springer International Publishing.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Saunders.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Saunders.
Kipnis, L. (2004). Against love: A polemic. Vintage.
Lee, J. A. (1973). The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving (Popular Edition, 1976 ed.). New Press.
Luhmann, N. (1986). Love as passion: The codification of intimacy. Translated by Jeremy Gaines and Doris L. Jones. Harvard University Press.
Montagna, N. (2023). For a New Sociology of Social Love. The American Sociologist, 54, 338-348.
Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 29.
Parsons. T. (1943). The kinship system of the contemporary United States. American Anthropologist, 45(1), 22-38.
Parsons. T. (1955). The American family: Its relations to personality and to the social structure. In Parsons. T. And Bales. R. F. (Eds). Family, socialization, and interaction process (pp. 3-33). The Free Press.
Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In Vance, C. (Ed.), Pleasure and danger (pp. 267-319). Routledge.
Rusu, M. S. (2018). Theorizing love in sociological thought: Classical contributions to a sociology of love. Journal of Classical Sociology, 18(1), 3-21.
Shellenbarger, N. (2004). No comfort in numbers: Divorce rate varies widely from group to group. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from:http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108258539159789775. (Accessed on July 21, 2023).
Sjoberg. G. (1960). The preindustrial city: Past and present. The Free Press.
Sorokin, P. A. (1948). The reconstruction of humanity. Beacon Press.
Sorokin, P. A. (1950). Altruistic love: A study of American ‘good neighbors’ and Christian saints. Beacon Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grajek, S. (1984). The nature of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(2), 312-329.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135.
Symonds. M., & Pudsey. J. (2006). The forms of brotherly love in Max Weber’s sociology of religion. Sociological Theory, 24(2), 133-149.
Tennov, D. (1979). Love and limerence: The experience of being in love. Stein and Day Publishers.
Warner, M. (Ed.). (1993). Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory. University of Minnesota Press.
Weber, M. (1946). Religious rejection of the world and their directions. In Gerth H. H., & Wright Mills. C., (Eds), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 323-359). Oxford University Press.
Wilkinson, E. (2010). Equalise love! Intimate citizenship beyond marriage. In Strid, S., & Jónasdóttir, A. G. (Eds.), GEXcel work in progress report volume VIII: Proceedings from GEXcel theme 10: Love in our time: a question for feminism. Center of Gender Excellence (GEXcel): Linköping University & Örebro University. Retrieved from: http://oru.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:417832/FULLTEXT02.pdf. (Accessed on 1 August 2023).
Wittig, M. (1992). The straight mind. Beacon Press.
Young, D. R. (2017). Queer Love. MacMillan Interdisciplinary Handbooks.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v6i2.22122
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Wisnu Adihartono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simulacra has been indexed in these prominent indexing services:
Simulacra is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA and published by the Center for Sociological Studies and Community Development, Department of Sociology, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia.