_-_Barcode.png "e-ISSN")
Contesting space and power: Rethinking Habermas’s public sphere on the Madurese paternalistic ideology
Abstract
The public sphere is not always what Jürgen Habermas imagines, which is inclusive, egalitarian and pressure-free. In the Madurese paternalistic constellation, the dominations of power over the contestation of public opinion and action become prominent in the relationship between participants/actors. A meeting between different interests causes this contestation. The struggle for influence is also shown by the dominance of ‘capital’ or resources. In Madura, Kiai are considered to have ‘charismatic’ symbolic capital related to the historical and cultural aspects of the Madurese ethnicity. This makes the figure of Kiai (along with Blater as a twin regime) become the center of consensus-making in a paternalistic public discussion. This phenomenological qualitative research becomes interesting when the world view of the local community is connected with Habermas’ perspective through the idea of European version of the bourgeois public sphere, which is considered not applicable to the local genius Madurese realm. The arena of public sphere in the Tanean Lanjhang pattern and the existence of ‘langgar’ (mosque) in the social community rejects the characterization of Habermas and brings a new definition of Madurese paternalistic public sphere, which is hegemony-mutualistic, as one of the richness of Indonesian cultural patterns.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, M. C. M. P. H. A. N., & Adams, N. (2006). Habermas and theology. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=BvbJdgZgNJcC
Agus, T. (2008). Kekuasaan Kiai di Madura (Studi genealogi kekuasaan Kiai di Dusun Tenggina, Desa Larangan Perreng, Kecamatan Pragaan, Kabupaten Sumenep Madura). Thesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
Alejandro, R. (1993). Hermeneutics, citizenship, and the public sphere. State University of New York Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=-G9mQCKREIUC
Anderson, B. R. O. G. (2006). Language and power: Exploring political cultures in Indonesia. Equinox. https://books.google.co.id/books? id=05cZ6dxZYLcC
Anwar, A. (1998). Analisis model seting ruang komunal sebagai sarana kegiatan interaksi sosial penghuni rumah susun (Studi kasus rumah susun Pekunden dan Sombo). Thesis. Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Diponegoro.
Arditama, E. (2016). Mengkaji ruang publik dari perspektif kuasa: Fenomena kemenangan aktor hegemonik melalui dominasi budaya. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 1(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v1i1.9181
Bourdieu, P., Thompson, J. B., Raymond, G., & Adamson, M. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=u2ZlGBiJntAC
Calhoun, C. J. (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. MIT Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=5F8qjMkoxZ0C
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Ykruxor10cYC
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=4uB76IC_pOQC
de Jonge, H. (1989). Madura dalam empat zaman: Pedagang, perkembangan ekonomi, dan Islam: Suatu studi antropologi ekonomi. Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Landen Volkenkunde (KITLV), LIPI, PT. Gramedia. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=2YseAAAAMAAJ
Dictionary, L. (1984). Longman dictionary of the English language. Longman Group.
Gramsci, A., Buttigieg, J. A., A, B. J., Callari, A., & Buttigieg, J. (1992). Prison notebooks (Issue V. 2). Columbia University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Gc8edC9wPEgC
Habermas, J. (2015). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=jWOzCgAAQBAJ
Habermas, J., Habermas, J., Burger, T., & Lawrence, F. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=e799caakIWoC
Habermas, J., McCarthy, T., & Lawrence, F. (2018). The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=YXxSDwAAQBAJ
Habermas, J., & Shapiro, J. J. (2014). Toward a rational society: Student protest, science, and politics. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=kLjlBQAAQBAJ
Hardiman, F. B. (1993). Menuju masyarakat komunikatif. Penerbit Kanisius. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Jh8NPAAACAAJ
Hardiman, F. B. (2004). Kritik ideologi: Menyingkap kepentingan pengetahuan bersama Jurgen Habermas. Buku Baik. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Nd9bAgAACAAJ
Hardiman, F. B. (2009). Demokrasi deliberatif: Menimbang negara hukum dan ruang publik dalam teori diskursus Jurgen Habermas. Penerbit Kanisius. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=32MAx08Ne9gC
Hardiman, F. B. (2010). Ruang publik.Kanisius. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=5qQayADUzLkC
Hardiman, F. B. (2008). Teori diskursus dan demokrasi: Peralihan Habermas ke dalam filsafat politik. Diskursus, 7(1), 1–27.
Haryono, A. (2015). Revitalisasi ungkapan tradisional Madura sebagai upaya pemertahanan bahasa dan budaya Madura. Thesis. Universitas Jember.
Haryono, A. (2011). Pola komunikasi warga NU etnis Madura sebagai refleksi budaya paternalistik. Humaniora, 23(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.1020
Haryono, A. (2014). Kisah Ulama/Kiai sebagai strategi penyampaian pesan warga Nahdlatul Ulama etnik Madura. Humaniora, 26(3), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.6192
Hefni, M. (2012). Bhuppa’-bhabhu’-ghururato (Studi konstruktivisme-strukturalis tentang hierarkhi kepatuhan dalam budaya masyarakat Madura). KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 11(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v11i1.144
Hefni, M. (2012). Patron-client relationship pada masyarakat Madura. KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 15(1), 15–24. 10.19105/karsa.v15i1.110.
Hegel, G. W. F., Wood, A. W., & Nisbet, H. B. (1991). Hegel: Elements of the philosophy of right. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=FVJRWWD-3fAC
Heng, J., & Kusuma, A. B. (2013). Konsepsi langgar sebagai ruang sakral pada Tanean Lanjhang. Jurnal Arsitektur Komposisi, 10(4), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.24002/jars.v10i4.1167
Hicks, D. (1996). Across Madura strait: The dynamics of an insular society. Edited by Kees van Dijk, Houb de Jonge and Elly Touwen-Bousma. The Journal of Asian Studies, 55(3), 795–796.
Indeswari, A., Antariksa, A., Pangarsa, G. W., & Wulandari, L. D. (2013). Pola ruang bersama pada permukiman Madura Medalungan di Dusun Baran Randugading. RUAS (Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies), 11(1), 37–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2013.011.01.4
Khoiri, A. (2017). Kontrol politik Kiai dan Blater dalam pelaksanaan pemilu: Kajian kelemahan ketentuan hukum pemilu menghadapi rezim kembar politik di Madura. VOICE JUSTISIA: Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 1(2), 131–141.
Kramsch, C., & Widdowson, H. G. (1998). Language and culture. OUP Oxford. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=XRPiONIC2PMC
Kuntowijoyo (2017). Madura 1850-1940: Perubahan sosial dalam masyarakat agraris. IRCiSoD.
Ma’arif, S. (2015). The history of Madura: Sejarah panjang Madura dari kerajaan, kolonialisme sampai kemerdekaan. Araska. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=LgAnrgEACAAJ
Ma’arif, S. (2010). Pola hubungan patron-client Kiai dan Santri di Pesantren. Ta’dib: Journal of Islamic Education (Jurnal Pendidikan Islam), 15(02), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.19109/td.v15i02.76
Mills, S. (2006). Discourse. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=FK6IAgAAQBAJ
Patriadi, H. B., Bakar, M. Z. A., & Hamat, Z. (2015). Human security in local wisdom perspective: Pesantren and its responsibility to protect people. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 28, 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.015
Prasetyo, A. G. (2012). Menuju demokrasi rasional: Melacak pemikiran Jürgen Habermas tentang ruang publik. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 16(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10901
Pribadi, Y. (2013). Religious networks in Madura: Pesantren, Nahdlatul Ulama, and Kiai as the core of santri culture. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 51(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2013.511.1-32
Pribadi, Y. (2018). Islam, state and society in Indonesia: Local politics in Madura. Routledge.
Rozaki, A. (2004). Menabur kharisma menuai kuasa: Kiprah Kiai dan Blater sebagai rezim kembar di Madura. Pustaka Marwa. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=NMfXAAAAMAAJ
Sadik, S. S. S. (2012). Revitalisasi semangat buppha’ bhabhu’ ghuru rato dalam melihat Madura ke depan. KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 11(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v11i1.145
Sahab, A. (2012). Politik patron-client di Kabupaten Sampang. Jurnal Jejaring Administrasi Publik, 2(8), 1-7.
Sastrodiwirdjo, K. (2012). Ruh Islam dalam ke-Madura-an dan ke-Indonesia-an. KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 13(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v13i1.130
Schutz, A., Walsh, G., & Lehnert, F. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=TobLgxW6ZXkC
Susanto, E. (2012). Ruh Islam dalam “wadag” lokal Madura: Kasus “tanean lanjhang.” KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 14(2), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v14i2.122
Susanto, E. S. E. (2012). Kepemimpinan [kharismatik] Kiai dalam perspektif masyarakat Madura. KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 11(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v11i1.146
Syarif, Z. (2013). Mitos nilai-nilai kepatuhan santri. TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.19105/jpi.v7i1.376
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A Guidebook and Resource. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=pONoCgAAQBAJ
Touwen-Bousma, C. (1988). Staat, Islam en locale leiders in West Madura, Indonesië. Mondiss.
Touwen-Bouwsma, E. (1992). The Ulama of Madura: Rise and expansion of a religious regime. in Mart Bax, Peter Kloos and Adrianus Koster (eds.), Faith and Polity on Religion and Politics. VU University Press.
Tulistyantoro, L. (2006). Makna ruang pada tanean lanjhang di Madura. Dimensi Interior, 3(2).
Widiatsih, A., Ulfatin, N., Arifin, I., & Supriyanto, A. (2018). Local wisdom as the basic of analysis in the planning of the management of the relationship between school and society. Pancaran Pendidikan, 7(2), 82-93. 10.25037/pancaran.v7i2.158
Wiyata, A. L. (2003). Madura yang patuh?: Kajian antropologi mengenai budaya Madura. Ceric-FISIP, UI.
Wiyata, A. L. (2008). Manusia Madura: Pandangan hidup, perilaku dan etos kerja. in Ayu Sutarto, Setya Yuwana Sudikan (Ed.), Pemetaan Kebudayaan Propinsi Jawa Timur.
Zamroni, I. (2014). Dinamika elit lokal Madura. Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi, 23–48. https://doi/org/10.7454/mjs.v17i1.3744
Zamroni, I. Z. I. (2012). Kekuasaan juragan dan Kiai di Madura. KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 12(2), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v12i2.140
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v5i1.12218
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Syamsu Budiyanti, Hotman M. Siahaan, Kris Nugroho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simulacra has been indexed in these prominent indexing services:
Simulacra is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA and published by the Center for Sociological Studies and Community Development, Department of Sociology, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia.
