Pemanfaatan Analytical Hirarchy Process untuk Penentuan Karakteristik  Combat Aircraft dalam Rangka Mendukung Industri Pertahanan Nasional

Ahmad Afandi; Dwi Soedianto; Edy Iwan Bangun

doi:10.21107/rekayasa.v15i2.14154

Pemanfaatan Analytical Hirarchy Process untuk Penentuan Karakteristik Combat Aircraft dalam Rangka Mendukung Industri Pertahanan Nasional

Ahmad Afandi, Dwi Soedianto, Edy Iwan Bangun

Abstract

The Indonesian Air Force is the main combat tool in the use of force to defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia as a unit in order to achieve guarantees for the safety of the nation and state. Indonesia only relies on 33 F-16 AM, BM, C and D aircraft, which are more than 30 years old. Then 16 Sukhoi 27 and 30 aircraft with almost 20 years of age as the main fighter aircraft. The limited number of aircraft spare parts as well as the limited types and number of guided missiles also caused the combat readiness of the F16 and Sukhoi 27 and 30 aircraft to be not optimal. The F5 Tiger fighter has fallen out of service in recent years and there has been no replacement to date. Likewise, the Hawk 100/200 aircraft which are more than 25 years old. the obligation of the Ministry of Defense to plan the purchase of fighter aircraft that will operate until 2030 and 2040. This research will use the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to determine the choice of Combat Aircraft with predetermined criteria with the alternative choice of Dassault Rafale fighter aircraft from France, the Su 35 Russian-made and US-made F-15 EX aircraft. The highest data processing results are Dassault Rafale 63.7%, Su 35 20.3% and F-15 EX 16%. The result of the Multirole Combat Aircraft selection is that the Dassaut Rafale is selected. with an Inconsistency value of 0.04. This shows that the alternative calculation is still within the inconsistency threshold, which is less than 0.1. With the election of Dassault Rafale, it is hoped that the Transfer of Technology with PT. Indonesian Aerospace in order to increase the capability of the Domestic Defense Industry, especially the Air Force. later PT DI will be directly involved in the Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) process, including the preparation of the supporting infrastructure

Keywords

analytic hierarchy process (AHP), expert choice, combat aircraft, defense industry

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Abdi, M. R., & Labib, A. W. (2003). A design strategy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs) using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): a case study. International Journal of production research, 41(10), 2273-2299.

Amborowati, A. (2004). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Perumahan dengan Metode AHP menggunakan Expert Choice.

Ardil, C. (2021). A Comparative Analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Analysis Methods for Strategic, Tactical, and Operational Decisions in Military Fighter Aircraft Selection. International Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, 14(7), 275-288.

Ariani, F. (2017). Sistem Penunjang Dalam Penentuan Prioritas Pemilihan Percetakan Media Promosi Menggunakan Metode AHP. Jurnal Informatika, 4(2).

Aviation, D., Force, F. A., Navy, F., Force, E. A., Force, Q. A., & Force, I. A. Dassault Rafale.

Basak, I., & Saaty, T. (1993). Group decision making using the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and computer modelling, 17(4-5), 101-109.

Byun, D. H. (2001). The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model. Information & management, 38(5), 289-297.

Dobias, A. P. (1990). Designing a mouse trap using the analytic hierarchy process and expert choice. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 57-65.

Erdogan, S. A., Šaparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2017). Decision making in construction management: AHP and expert choice approach. Procedia engineering, 172, 270-276.

Fitriyani, F., & Helmud, E. (2016). Pemilihan paket internet android pada operator telepon gsm menggunakan metode analytical hierarchy process (ahp). Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 8(1), 918.

Iriadi, N., & Yohana, D. (2016). Pengaruh Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Pemilihan Mobil Lcgc dengan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Jurnal Khatulistiwa Informatika, 4(2).

Malik, L., Rawat, S., Kumar, M., & Tevatia, A. (2021). Simulation studies on aerodynamic features of Eurofighter Typhoon and Dassault Rafale combat aircraft. Materials Today: Proceedings, 38, 191-197.

Mardiyati, S., JULIANA, J., & DRIYANI, D. (2016). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Perumahan Dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP. Faktor Exacta, 9(1), 63-71.

Ossadnik, W., & Lange, O. (1999). AHP-based evaluation of AHP-Software. European journal of operational research, 118(3), 578-588.

Retnoningsih, D. (2011). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Expert Choice Sebagai Alat Bantu Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan (Studi Kasus: Pemilihan Program Studi di Universitas Sahid Surakarta). Jurnal Gaung Informatika, 4(1).

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98.

Saifullah, S. (2021). Fuzzy-AHP approach using Normalized Decision Matrix on Tourism Trend Ranking based-on social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04222.

Sanyoto, G. P., Handayani, R. I., & Widanengsih, E. (2017). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Laptop Untuk Kebutuhan Operasional Dengan Metode AHP (Studi Kasus: Direktorat Pembinaan Kursus Dan Pelatihan Kemdikbud). Pilar Nusa Mandiri: Journal of Computing and Information System, 13(2), 167-174.

Setiyadi, A., & Agustia, R. D. (2018). Penerapan Metode AHP Dalam Memilih Marketplace E-Commerce Berdasarkan Software Quality and Evaluation ISO/IEC 9126-4 Untuk UMKM. Ikra-Ith Informatika: Jurnal Komputer Dan Informatika, 2(3), 61-70.

Yulianto, J. (2017). Pemilihan alat pancang menggunakan expert choice. Jurnal Riset Rekayasa Sipil, 1(1), 50-58