Pemilihan Multirole Maritime Patrol Aircraft Anti Kapal Selam dan Anti Kapal Permukaan Sebagai Benchmark Industri Pertahanan Udara

Eko Yulianto, Tunggul Puliwarna, Jumino Jumino

Abstract

The Indonesian Navy (TNI AL) is required to have a persistently broad Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA). In meeting its MDA demands, apart from using the KRI Radar, the Indonesian Navy needs to be supported by other airborne surveillance sensors and sensing satellites in outer space. For airborne sensors, Puspenerbal has been equipped with a fleet of maritime patrol aircraft  (MPA) based on Casa NC 212-200 MPA and CN 235-220 MPA. However, all of these MPAs have a low detection capacity (less than 100 Km) and are not equipped with weapons to respond to threats on the surface or under the sea. For this reason, it is necessary to carry out research on the Long Range MPA requirement to support the tasks of the Navy with the aim of providing information and input to the Leaders in making decisions related to the plan to procure weapons and the strategic policies of the Navy to enforce defense and maintain security in the marine area of national jurisdiction. Indonesia This research will use the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to determine the choice of maritime reconnaissance aircraft with predetermined criteria with alternative options, namely P-8A Poseidon, SAAB 6000 MPA, Kawasaki P-1, and ATR 72 MPA. The selected alternative was based on a combination of 3 criteria, namely P-8A Poseidon 58.3%, SAAB 6000 MPA 20.4%, Kawasaki P-1 14.4%, and ATR 72 MPA 6.8%. the result of the selection of the Tactical Reconnaissance Maritime Patrol Aircraft is that the P-8A Poseidon is the right alternative to choose. with an Inconsistency value of 0.06. This shows that the calculation of the alternative is still within the inconsistency threshold, which cannot be more than 0.1.

Keywords

air defense industry, Indonesian Navy, martime patrol aircraft, analytical hierarchy process

References

Abdi, M. R., & Labib, A. W. (2003). A design strategy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs) using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): a case study. International Journal of production research, 41(10), 2273-2299.

Amborowati, A. (2004). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Perumahan dengan Metode AHP menggunakan Expert Choice.

Ariani, F. (2017). Sistem Penunjang Dalam Penentuan Prioritas Pemilihan Percetakan Media Promosi Menggunakan Metode AHP. Jurnal Informatika, 4(2).

Basak, I., & Saaty, T. (1993). Group decision making using the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and computer modelling, 17(4-5), 101-109.

Byun, D. H. (2001). The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model. Information & management, 38(5), 289-297.

Chrisnadi, L. (2019). PENERAPAN AHP DALAM PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER DI CV. HUTAN RIMBA DENGAN EXPERT CHOICE. Jurnal Valtech, 2(1), 83-86.

Dobias, A. P. (1990). Designing a mouse trap using the analytic hierarchy process and expert choice. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 57-65.

Erdogan, S. A., Šaparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2017). Decision making in construction management: AHP and expert choice approach. Procedia engineering, 172, 270-276.

Fitriyani, F., & Helmud, E. (2016). Pemilihan paket internet android pada operator telepon gsm menggunakan metode analytical hierarchy process (ahp). Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 8(1), 918.

Iriadi, N., & Yohana, D. (2016). Pengaruh Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Pemilihan Mobil Lcgc dengan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Jurnal Khatulistiwa Informatika, 4(2).

Iriadi, N., & Yohana, D. (2016). Pengaruh Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Pemilihan Mobil Lcgc dengan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Jurnal Khatulistiwa Informatika, 4(2).

Mardiyati, S., JULIANA, J., & DRIYANI, D. (2016). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Perumahan Dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP. Faktor Exacta, 9(1), 63-71.

Ossadnik, W., & Lange, O. (1999). AHP-based evaluation of AHP-Software. European journal of operational research, 118(3), 578-588.

Retnoningsih, D. (2011). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Expert Choice Sebagai Alat Bantu Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan (Studi Kasus: Pemilihan Program Studi di Universitas Sahid Surakarta). Jurnal Gaung Informatika, 4(1).

Retnoningsih, D. (2011). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Expert Choice Sebagai Alat Bantu Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan (Studi Kasus: Pemilihan Program Studi di Universitas Sahid Surakarta). Jurnal Gaung Informatika, 4(1).

Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98.

Saifullah, S. (2021). Fuzzy-AHP approach using Normalized Decision Matrix on Tourism Trend Ranking based-on social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04222.

Sanyoto, G. P., Handayani, R. I., & Widanengsih, E. (2017). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Laptop Untuk Kebutuhan Operasional Dengan Metode AHP (Studi Kasus: Direktorat Pembinaan Kursus Dan Pelatihan Kemdikbud). Pilar Nusa Mandiri: Journal of Computing and Information System, 13(2), 167-174.

Setiyadi, A., & Agustia, R. D. (2018). Penerapan Metode AHP Dalam Memilih Marketplace E-Commerce Berdasarkan Software Quality and Evaluation ISO/IEC 9126-4 Untuk UMKM. Ikra-Ith Informatika: Jurnal Komputer Dan Informatika, 2(3), 61-70.

Yulianto, J. (2017). Pemilihan alat pancang menggunakan expert choice. Jurnal Riset Rekayasa Sipil, 1(1), 50-58

DOI

https://doi.org/10.21107/rekayasa.v15i2.14153

Metrics

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Eko Yulianto, Tunggul Puliwarna, Jumino Jumino

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.