Analisis Skala Student Well-Being Versi Indonesia pada Mahasiswa dengan Rasch Mixture Model

Erlavianda Tarita Putri; Khoifulloh Aprilianto; Ananta Yudiarso

doi:10.21107/personifikasi.v16i2.28780

Analisis Skala Student Well-Being Versi Indonesia pada Mahasiswa dengan Rasch Mixture Model

Erlavianda Tarita Putri, Khoifulloh Aprilianto, Ananta Yudiarso

Abstract

This study evaluates the psychometric properties of the Indonesian Student Well-Being Scale (Aprilianto, 2023), grounded in Fraillon (2004) theory, using a quantitative validation design with data from 510 university students aged 19-25 collected through accidental sampling. The scale, initially comprising 53 items, was refined to 41 items after removing non-fitting items based on Rasch and Mixture Rasch Model (MRM) analyses. Results demonstrated the scale's unidimensionality, high reliability (Cronbach's alpha > 0.9), and valid measurement properties, with MRM identifying two latent classes reflecting demographic differences. The scale effectively measures intrapersonal and interpersonal dimensions using a 4-point Likert scale. However, it underrepresents extremely high well-being levels, highlighting the need for additional item development. Despite its strengths, future studies should explore broader demographic variables, including cultural and socioeconomic factors, to enhance the scale's applicability and depth.

Keywords

Student Well-Being, Rasch Model, Mixture Rasch Model

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

AERA, APA, & NCME. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.

Aprilianto, K. (2023). Penyusunan skala student well-being pada mahasiswa universitas hang tuah [Skripsi]. Universitas Hang Tuah. Diunduh dari https://repository.hangtuah.ac.id/js/pdfjs/web/viewer.html?file=/repository/KHOIFULLOH%20APRILIANTO.pdf pada 23 Mei 2025.

Azwar, S. (2022). Penyusunan skala psikologi edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azzahra, H., & Udaranti, W. S. (2013). Hubungan school well being dengan prestasi akademik pada siswa berbakat akademik kelas XI program Akselerasi di jakarta. [Skripsi]. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia. Diunduh dari https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?

id=20331022&lokasi=lokal pada 15 Mei 2025.

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2013). Applying the rasch model (Fundamental measurement in the human science, 2nd edition). New York: Psychology Press. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410614575 pada 24 April 2025.

Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch analysis for instrument development: Why, when, and how?. CBE—life sciences education, 15(4). Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148 pada 18 April 2025.

Collings, R., Swanson, V., & Watkins, R. (2014). The impact of peer mentoring on levels of student wellbeing, integration and retention: A controlled comparative evaluation of residential students in UK higher education. Higher Education, 68(6), 927–942. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9752-y pada 15 April 2025.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Fifth edition). New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276 pada 15 Mei 2025.

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 pada 15 Mei 2025.

Fraillon, J. (2004). Measuring student well-being in the context of australian schooling: Discussion paper. The Australian Council for Educational Research. (pp 04-48). Carlton South: The Australian Council for Educational Research

Fraine, B. De, Landeghem, G. Van, Damme, J. Van, & Onghena, P. (2005). An analysis of wellBeing in secondary school with multilevel growth curve models and multilevel multivariate models. Quality & Quantity, 39(3), 297–316. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-5010-1 pada 10 Mei 2025.

Howell, A. J., & Buro, K. (2015). Measuring and predicting student well-being: Further evidence in support of the flourishing scale and the scale of positive and negative experiences. Social Indicators Research, 121(3), 903–915. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0663-1 pada 14 Mei 2025.

Karyani, U., Prhiartanti, N., Dinar, W., Lestari, R., Hertinjung, W. S., & Prasetyaningrum, J. (2015). The dimensions of student well-being. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Psikologi dan Kemanusiaan: Perkembangan Manusia dan Kesejahteraan Psikologis. (pp 413-419). Malang: Psychology Forum Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Linacre, J. M. (1998). Structure in rasch residuals: Why principal components analysis (PCA)?. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 12(2), 636. Diunduh dari https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt263.pdf pada 16 Juni 2025.

Liu, C.-W., & Wang, W.-C. (2016). Unfolding IRT models for likert-type items with a don’t know option. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(7), 517–533. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621616664047 pada 16 Juni 2025.

McCreary, L. L., Conrad, K. M., Conrad, K. J., Scott, C. K., Funk, R. R., & Dennis, M. L. (2013). Using the rasch measurement model in psychometric Analysis of the family effectiveness measure. Nursing Research, 62(3), 149–159. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e31828eafe6 pada 02 Juni 2025.

Na’imah, T., & Tanireja, T. (2017). Student well-being pada remaja jawa. Psikohumaniora: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 2(1), 1. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.21580/pjpp.v2i1.979 pada 15 Mei 2025.

Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A monte carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396 pada 16 Juni 2025.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (Fourth edition). New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2013). Happiness experienced: The science of subjective well-being. Oxford Handbook of Happiness. 134-152. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557257.013.0010 pada 23 Juni 2025.

Purnomo, A. B. A. J. (2018). Hubungan antara school wellbeing dengan motivasi berprestasi pada siswa kelas XI sekolah menengah atas [Skripsi, Sanata Dharma University]. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/https://repository.usd.ac.id/32255/ pada 19 Mei 2025.

Ramdani, Z., & Prakoso, B. Hary. (2019). Integritas akademik: Prediktor kesejahteraan siswa di sekolah. Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment, 2(1). Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.26499/ijea.v2i1.14 pada 16 Mei 2025.

Rost, J. (1990). Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(3), 271–282. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169001400305 pada 16 Mei 2025.

Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138 pada 13 April 2025.

Sudaryono, S. (2017). Sensitivitas metode pendeteksian differential item functioning (DIF). Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3(1), 82. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.21009/JEP.031.07 pada 21 Juni 2025.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi model rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial (Revisi). Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2004). Latent class analysis (1st ed.). The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986311.n10 pada 18 Mei 2025.

Wati, K. D., & Leonardi, T. (2016). Perbedaan student well-being ditinjau dari persepsi siswa terhadap perilaku internasional guru. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan Dan Perkembangan, 5(1). Diunduh dari https://doi.org/https://journal.unair.ac.id/download-fullpapers-jppp5e023092772full.pdf pada 16 Mei 2025.

Widhiarso, W. (2013). Aplikasi model rasch campuran dalam mengevaluasi pengukuran harga diri. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(1), 172–187. Diunduh dari https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v17i1.1367 pada 05 Mei 2025.

Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. New York: MESA Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/personifikasi.v16i2.28780