Kontestasi Wacana Politik dalam Debat Capres RI 2024 Kajian Pragma-Dialektikal

Khusnul Khotimah, Emy Rizta Kusuma

Abstract


Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan hasil identifikasi dan analisis tentang dinamika wacana politik selama debat Capres berdasarkan kajian aspek pragmatik dan dialektika. Artinya, analisis isi debat dalam kajian ini menggunakan kolaborasi teori pragmatik dan dialektika untuk memahami interaksi linguistik antarcalon presiden. Analisis pragmadialektikal memberikan pemahaman tentang strategi peserta debat dalam menggunakan bahasa untuk membangun argumen, merespon pertanyaan, dan mempengaruhi audiens. Hasil dari kajian ini menunjukkan bahwa kontestasi wacana politik tidak hanya terjadi dalam konteks isu-isu politik, tetapi juga terjadi pada strategi komunikasi dan penggunaan bahasa oleh Capres. Strategi debat yang ditemukan dalam kajian ini, yaitu (1) retorika untuk menguatkan citra positif, (2) penggunaan bahasa yang tegas dan menonjolkan kepemimpinan, (3) strategi bahasa komunikasi yang empatik, (4) penghindaran bahasa yang kontroversial, (5) penggunaan pernyataan taktis untuk menangkal lawan debat, (6) menanggapi pernyataan dengan keterampilan komunikatif, serta (7) penggunaan analogi dan metafora untuk menyampaikan pesan politik. Temuan tersebut berkontribusi pada pemahaman lebih lanjut tentang dinamika wacana politik, khususnya dalam debat Capres. Selain itu, temuan tersebut juga dapat memperluas perspektif tentang penelitian pragmadialektikal dalam analisis politik.

Keywords


kontestasi, wacana politik, debat capres, pragma-dialektikal

References


Alaghbary, G. S. (2020). Looting Leads to Shooting: A Pragma-dialectical Analysis of President Trump’s Argumentative Discourse on Floyd’s Death. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 1854–1868. https://doi.org/10.17263/JLLS.851011

Betti, M. J., & Ghadhab, A. O. (2020). A Pragma-Dialectical Study of The Argumentative Indicators in American Electoral Campaign Debates. International Journal of Advancement in Social Science and Humanity, 9, 1–2. https://www.ijassh.in/admin1/upload/05 Mohammed Jasim Betti 48533.pdf

Dalmaijer, E. (2019). Debating Online Over Less Meat and Other Matters of Public Concern: A pragma-dialectical Characterisation and Analysis of Online Large-Scale Complex Public Debates [Leiden University]. http://hdl.handle.net/1887/80809

Eemeren, F. H. van. (2012). The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion. Argumentation, 26(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-012-9274-7 Eemeren, F. H. van. (2015). Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory (28th ed.). Springer.

Eemeren, F. H. van. (2018). Argumentation Theory: A Pragma- Dialectical Perspective. Springer.

Eemeren, F. H. van., & Garssen, B. (2020). From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the (35th ed.). Springer.

Eemeren, F. H. van., dkk. (2012). Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research. Argumentation, 26(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9234-7

Eemeren, F. H. van., dkk. (2013). Handbook of Argumentation Theory. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6883-3

Eemeren, F. H. van., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation The pragma-dialectical approach In. United States of America by Cambridge University Press.

Eemeren, F. H. van., & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1035-6851.2001.00246.x-i3

Eemeren, F. H. van., & Houtlosser, P. (2003). The Development of The Pragma- dialectical Approach to Argumentation. Argumentation, 17(4), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026338402751

Eemeren, F. H. van., dkk. (2007). Argumentative Indicators A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Springer.

Eemeren, F. H. van., & Peng, W. (2017). Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Eemeren, F. H. van. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse (2nd ed.). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Eemeren, F. H. van, dkk. (2009). Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness Empiricial Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules (16th ed.). Springer.

Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (2006). Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies Una perspectiva pragma-dialéctica. In Publicidad Universitaria. Universitaria.

Foucault, M. (1969). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Tavistock Publications.

Hess-Lettich, E. W. B. (2007). (Pseudo)- Argumentation in TV Debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(8), 1360–1370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.008

Jazeri, M. (2012). Penalaran Asosiatif dan Disosiatif dalam Debat Politik di Televisi. Litera, 11(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v11i1.1153

Jerrold J. Katz. (1972). Semantic Theory. New York: Harper & Row.

Luginbuhl, M. (2007). Conversational Violence in Political TV Debates: Forms and Functions. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(8), 1371–1387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.003

Omar, A. A. (2019). Strategic Maneuvering for Political Change (Issue February). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Poppel, L. van. (2020). The Relevance of Metaphor in Argumentation. Uniting Pragma-dialectics and Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 170, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.007

Rybacki, K. C., & Rybacki, D. J. (2014). Advocacy and Opposition: An Introduction to Argumentation. Person Education Limited

Sudaryanto. (2018). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Svačinová, I. (2020). Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary-Writing as a Communicative Activity Type. Argumentation, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09524-0




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/metalingua.v9i1.25094

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Khusnul Khotimah, Emy Rizta Kusuma

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Metalingua by Universitas Trunojoyo Madura is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed by: