Email this article 
Leading Sectors and Inequality in Urban Areas of DKI Jakarta Province
Abstract
This study aims to find out the economic structure in 5 cities in DKI Jakarta Province. The research method uses descriptive quantitative research with data sources from the Central Statistics Agency. The 2 analysis tools used are Location Quotient (LQ) and Williamson Index (IW). The development process of DKI Jakarta Province has experienced obstacles due to the Covid-19 pandemic so that it has experienced economic recovery in 2021 post-pandemic. Location Quotient analysis shows that South Jakarta does not have a superior sector, West Jakarta and Central Jakarta have 1 superior sector while the most superior sectors are in North Jakarta with 6 sectors and East Jakarta with 7 sectors. The Williamson Index shows that 2 regions, namely West Jakarta and Central Jakarta, experienced a decrease in income inequality while North Jakarta, South Jakarta and East Jakarta experienced an increase in income inequality. Despite being faced with various problems in regional development in terms of sectoral and income inequality, DKI Jakarta is still a benchmark and reference for development for other regions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DKI Jakarta, (2023), Katalog Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Provinsi DKI Jakarta Menurut Lapangan Usaha 2019-2023
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Jakarta Barat, (2024), Katalog Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Jawa Barat 2023
Ardiansyah, N. (2019). Ketimpangan Ekonomi di Wilayah DKI Jakarta: Perspektif Ekonomi politik. Scientific Repository IPB University, Economics dan Development Studies.
Dahliah, D. (2020). Economics during global recession: sharia-economics as a post covid-19 agenda. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 1077–1085.
Elpisah, E., Suarlin, S., & Yahya, M. (2021). Klassen Typology and Williamson Index to Measure Macroeconomics in South Sulawesi Province. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 1(1), 37–49.
Fattah, S., & Rahman, A. (2013). Analysis of regional economic development in the regency/municipality at South Sulawesi province in Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 1–9.
Fracasso, A., & Vittucci Marzetti, G. (2018). Estimating dynamic localization economies: the inadvertent success of the specialization index and the location quotient. Regional Studies, 52(1), 119–132.
Katti, S., Pratiwi, D., & Setiahadi, R. (2019). Klassen typology approach for analysis of the role of competitiveness agricultural sector. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 347(1), 12106.
Kuncoro, M. (2019). Ekonomika Regional Teori dan Praktik. Penerbit Rajawali Pers. Depok.
Liyanaarachchi, T. S., Naranpanawa, A., & Bandara, J. S. (2016). Impact of trade liberalisation on labour market and poverty in Sri Lanka. An integrated macro-micro modelling approach. Economic Modelling, 59, 102–115.
Miller, M. M., Gibson, L. J., & Wright, N. G. (1991). Location quotient: A basic tool for economic development analysis. Economic Development Review, 9(2), 65.
Nguyen, H. H. (2019). The role of state budget expenditure on economic growth: empirical study in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(3), 81–89.
Taufiqqurrachman, F., & Jayadi, A. (2023). East Java’s Gerbangkertosusila National Strategic Area’s Economic Structure. Gorontalo Development Review, 61–68.
Wardhani, K. E. (2002). Peranan sektor perikanan dalam pembangunan wilayah Kota Jakarta Utara Provinsi Daerah khusus Ibukota Jakarta. Scientific Repository IPB University, Economics dan Development Studies.
Wasdani, K. P., & Prasad, A. (2020). The impossibility of social distancing among the urban poor: the case of an Indian slum in the times of COVID-19. Local Environment, 25(5), 414–418.
Xu, Z., & Dobson, S. (2019). Challenges of building entrepreneurial ecosystems in peripheral places. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 8(3), 408–430.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/mediatrend.v20i1.26780
Copyright (c) 2025 Media Trend
