The Development of Performance Measurement Research Over Three Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract
This paper provides a systematic literature review in light of performance measurement based on the Scopus database using bibliometric analysis. Performance measurement is a compelling research topic because of its imperativeness in entity success. There is no literature in regard to the analysis of the development of performance measurement research using a bibliometric analysis based on the Scopus database. This paper useful for researchers working in performance measurement research to understand the evolution of the literature and to capture future research opportunities. The core of this research is the development of performance measurement topics over several decades, from 1986-2020 using bibliometric analysis. This paper uses citation/co-citation analysis related to performance measurement to investigate the development of performance measurement research over the last three decades. 1,882 articles are investigated in this bibliometric analysis. This research figures out that performance measurement topics alter every period. The predominating performance measurement topic is benchmarking. This research also indicates that performance measurement-related research increases based on the number of publications and changes of research issues every period. This research can be used as one of the theoretical bases to observe performance measurement-related topics.
Penelitian ini bertujuan meninjau literatur secara sistematis terkait pengukuran kinerja berdasarkan basis data Scopus dengan analisis bibliometrik. Pengukuran kinerja menarik untuk diteliti karena berperan penting dalam kesuksesan suatu entitas. Belum terdapat literatur terkait analisis perkembangan riset pengukuran kinerja menggunakan analisis bibliometrik berdasarkan basis data Scopus. Penelitian ini bermanfaat bagi peneliti yang bekerja di penelitian pengukuran kinerja untuk memahami evolusi literatur dan untuk menangkap peluang penelitian di masa depan. Penelitian ini berfokus pada perkembangan topik terkait pengukuran kinerja yang dibagi menjadi beberapa dekade dari tahun 1986 hingga 2020. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis kutipan/ko-sitasi terkait dengan pengukuran kinerja untuk menyelidiki perkembangan kinerja penelitian pengukuran selama tiga dekade terakhir. 1.882 artikel diselidiki menggunakan analisis bibliometrik. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa topik pengukuran kinerja berubah setiap periode. Topik pengukuran kinerja yang mendominasi adalah benchmarking. Penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa penelitian terkait pengukuran kinerja meningkat berdasarkan jumlah publikasi dan perubahan isu penelitian setiap periode. Penelitian ini dapat dijadikan sebagai salah satu landasan teori untuk mengamati topik terkait pengukuran kinerja.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Account-ing Forum, 32(4), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.05.002
Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sus-tainable and smart cities? Cities, 60, 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009
Bititci, U. S. (1994). Measuring Your Way to Profit. Management Decision, 32(6), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749410065088
Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., & Platts, K. (2000). Designing, implementing and updating per-formance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(7), 754–771. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010330739
Bourne, M., Neely, A., Mills, J., & Platts, K. (2003). Implementing Performance Measurement Systems: A Liter-ature Review. International Journal Business Performance Management, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2003.002097
Bourne, M., Neely, A., Platts, K., & Mills, J. (2002). The success and failure of performance measurement initia-tives: Perceptions of participating managers. International Journal of Operations and Production Man-agement, 22(11), 1288–1310. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210450329
Chan, F. T. S., Lau, H. C. W., Ip, R. W. L., Chan, H. K., & Kong, S. (2005). Implementation of total productive maintenance: A case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 95(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.10.021
Chenhall, R. H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: An Australian study. Management Accounting Research, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1997.0060
Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P., & Voss, C. A. (1996). Development of a Technical Innovation Audit. Journal Produc-tion Management, 13, 105–136.
De Toni, A., & Tonchia, S. (2001). Performance measurement systems Models, characteristics and measures. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(1–2), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110358459
Deng, F., Smyth, H., & Anvuur, A. M. (2012). A critical review of PMS in construction: towards a research agenda. Organisational Strategy and Business Performance, 2(September), 807–816.
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the im-pact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2004). Sustainable Value Added - Measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics, 48(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.08.005
Firk, S., Richter, S., & Wolff, M. (2021). Does value-based management facilitate managerial decision-making? An analysis of divestiture decisions. Management Accounting Research, 51(March), 100736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2021.100736
Frederico, G. F., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, A., & Kumar, V. (2021). Performance measurement for supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era: a balanced scorecard approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(4), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2019-0400
Ghalayini, A. M., & Noble, J. S. (1996). The changing basis of performance measurement. International Jour-nal of Operations and Production Management, 16(8), 63–80.
H A Bassioni, Price, A. D. F., & Hassan, T. M. (2005). Building a conceptual framework for measuring busi-ness performance in construction: an empirical evaluation. Construction Management and Economics, 23(5), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619042000301401
Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20132314
Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.042
Holmberg, S. (2000). A systems perspective on supply chain measurements. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30(10), 847–868. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030010351246
Hristov, I., Appolloni, A., Chirico, A., & Cheng, W. (2021). The role of the environmental dimension in the performance management system: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126075
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., Griffith, D. A., Chabowski, B. R., Hamman, M. K., Dykes, B. J., … Cavusgil, S. T. (2008). An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1064–1080. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400398
Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2001). 241. Ittner and David F. Larcker (2001) Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting a value-based management perspective.pdf. Journal of Accounting and Eco-nomics, 32, 349–410.
Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Randall, T. (2003). Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measure-ment in Financial Services Firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 715–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00033-3
Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Ghadge, A., & Raut, R. (2020). A performance measurement system for indus-try 4.0 enabled smart manufacturing system in SMMEs- A review and empirical investigation. Interna-tional Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107853
Kanji, G. K. (2012). Measuring business excellence. Measuring Business Excellence, 1–240. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996737
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard – Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 71–79.
Kennerley, M., & Neely, A. (2002). A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance meas-urement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(11), 1222–1245. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210450293
Kleijnen, J. P. C., & Smits, M. T. (2003). Performance metrics in supply chain management. Journal of the Op-erational Research Society, 54(5), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601539
Knauer, T., Silge, L., & Sommer, F. (2018). The shareholder value effects of using value-based performance measures: Evidence from acquisitions and divestments. Management Accounting Research, 41(September 2015), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2018.02.001
Lai, K., Ngai, E. W. T., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2002). Measures for evaluating supply chain performance in transport logistics. Transportation Research, 38, 439–456.
Lambert, D. M., & Pohlen, T. L. (2001). Supply Chain Metrics. The International Journal of Logistics Manage-ment, Vol. 12, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090110806190
Le, T. T. (2020). Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. In Uncertain Supply Chain Management (Vol. 8). https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2019.8.003
Lee, H., & Whang, S. (1999). Decentralized multi-echelon supply chains: incentives and information. Man-agement Science, 45(5), 633–640. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.5.633
Leuschner, R., Rogers, D. S., & Charvet, F. F. (2013). A meta-analysis of supply chain integration and firm per-formance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 34–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12013
Lockamy, A., & McCormack, K. (2004). Linking SCOR planning practices to supply chain performance: An exploratory study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24(12), 1192–1218. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410569010
Magee, R. P. (2001). Discussion of “Contracting theory and accounting.” Journal of Accounting and Econom-ics, 32(1–3), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00020-9
Mamabolo, A., & Myres, K. (2020). Performance Measurement in Emerging Market Social Enterprises using a Balanced Scorecard. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1561499
McLaughlin, J. A., & Jordan, G. B. (1999). Logic models: A tool for telling your program’s performance story. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(98)00042-1
Melnyk, S. A., Stewart, D. M., & Swink, M. (2004). Metrics and performance measurement in operations man-agement: Dealing with the metrics maze. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.004
Mills, J., Platts, K., & Gregory, M. (1995). Manufacturing strategy: Literature review and some issues. Interna-tional Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 17–49.
Modell, S. (2001). Performance measurement and institutional processes: A study of managerial responses to public sector reform. Management Accounting Research, 12(4), 437–464. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2001.0164
Muchiri, P., & Pintelon, L. (2008). Performance measurement using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): Literature review and practical application discussion. International Journal of Production Research, 46(13), 3517–3535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540601142645
Neely, A. (1999). The performance measurement revolution : why now and what next ? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(2), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910247437
Neely, A., & Bourne, M. (2000). Why Measurement Initiatives Fail. Measuring Business Excellence, 4(4), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040010362283
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622
Power, M. (2004). Counting, control and calculation: Reflections on measuring and management. Human Relations, 57(6), 765–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704044955
Rogers, D. S., Lambert, D. M., Croxton, K. L., & García-Dastugue, S. J. (2005). The International Journal of Lo-gistics Management Emerald Article : Supply Chain Metrics. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(2001).
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2006.010098
Sharma, M. K., Bhagwat, R., & Dangayach, G. S. (2005). Practice of performance measurement: experience from Indian SMEs. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 1(2), 183–213. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGSB.2005.008014
Singh, H., Motwani, J., & Kumar, A. (2000). A review and analysis of the state-of-the-art research on produc-tivity measurement. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 100(5), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570010335271
Wilson, D. D., & Collier, D. A. (2000). An empirical investigation of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award causal model. Decision Sciences, 31(2), 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2000.tb01627.x
Yahya, S., & Goh, W. K. (2002). Managing human resources toward achieving knowledge management. Jour-nal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210450414
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v17i2.11830
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Dian Agustina
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.