gajahslot mariatogel airbet robopragma wajik77 mposlot paito hk ronaldo slot slot gacor malam ini Analysis Of Load Variations On ST 60 Steel Using Vickers Method | Hidayat | International Journal of Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Analysis Of Load Variations On ST 60 Steel Using Vickers Method

Hidayat Hidayat


The use of metal in the industrial world, especially ST60 Steel, is a very vital need, this can be seen from the increasing number of machine or equipment components or construction parts made of steel. Hardness is one of the mechanical properties that is often used as a guide in selecting materials for an equipment component. To find out the hardness price of a material, various testing methods can be used, including the Vickers method, which is tested by applying a force to the indented diamond pyramid against the material for which the hardness value is determined. The amount of hardness value is determined by the magnitude of the loading force divided by the area of indentation. In this study, what was investigated was the effect of force on the hardness of the Vickers method. The results showed that the load variation had little effect on the results of the Vickers hardness value, especially for high loads (100 Kgf). The average hardness value for the mild steel being tested is 163 HV and 168 HV, the highest hardness value is 174 HV and the lowest hardness value is 156 HV, so that a tolerance of ± 10 HV commonly used in the Vickers test is sufficient.

Keywords: Hardness, ST 60 Steel , Loading Variations, Vickers Test

Full Text:



Callister, W., “Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction”, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 2006.

Liang, K. M., Orange, G. and Fantozzi, G., “Evaluation by Indentation of Fracture Toughness of Ceramic Materials”, Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 25, 2004, pp. 207-214.

ASTM E140-05e1, “Standard Hardness Conversion Tables for Metals Relationship Among Brinell Hardness, Vickers Hardness, Rockwell Hardness, Superficial Hardness, Knoop Hardness, and Scleroscope Hardness”, ASTM International, 2005.

Solution for Automatic Microstructures Analysis from Images Based on a Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network”, Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 23, 2008, pp. 273283.

Imasogie, B. I., Wendt, U., “Characterization of graphite particle shape in spheroidal graphite iron using a computer based image analyzer”, Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization & Engineering, Vol. 3, 2004, pp 1-12.

Li, P. and Xiao, X., “An Unsupervised Marker Image Generation Method for Watershed Segmentation of Multispectral Imagery”, Geosciences Journal, Vol. 8, 2004, pp. 325-331. [14] Yao, L. and Fang, C. H., “An Automatic Hardness Measuring Method using Hough Transform and Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 3, 2001, pp. 842-847.

Aydemir B., Sertlik Olcum Yontemlerinin Bugunu ve Yarini, Metal Dunyasi, Sayi 189,Sayfa 84-87, 2009

Bora M.O., Coban O., Sinmazcelik T., Gunay V., Zeren M., Materials and Design 312707–2715, 2010

EN ISO 14577-1,2002, Metallic materials--Instrumented indentation test for hardnessand materials parameters--Part 1: Test method.




  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Hidayat -

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.