NOTARY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIRD PARTY LOSSES DUE TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE DEED OF BINDING OF LAND PURCHASE AGREEMENT

Halimi Halimi

Abstract


Third parties in the formation of the Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement Land have rights to the object regulated in the PPJB even though they are not involved in its formation as long as they have legal ties to the object being agreed upon. When a material loss occurs to a third party originating from the issuance of the PPJB, does the notary have the responsibility to compensate for the loss or vice versa? This type of legal research is a type of normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that legal remedies that a third party can take if the deed of binding sale and purchase agreement issued by a notary causes harm to him is to send a subpoena, carry out an unlawful act lawsuit, report an alleged criminal act and make a complaint to the Regional Supervisory Council. The form of liability that a Notary can bear for the issuance of the Deed of Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement which is detrimental to third parties is civil liability by compensating for losses suffered by third parties by the provisions of Article 1365 of the Civil Code and criminal liability, namely serving a criminal sentence following the criminal provisions in Article 263 paragraph (1) and (2) or 264 or 266 of the Indonesian Criminal Code and ethically responsible according to Article 85 by receiving administrative sanctions.


Keywords


Responsibility, Notary, Civil Sanctions, Criminal Sanctions.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulkadir Muhammad. Etika Profesi Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditia Bakti, 2006.

Adjie, Habib. “Konsep Notaris Mayantara Menghadapi Tantangan Persaingan Global.” Jurnal Hukum Respublica 16, no. 2 (June 13, 2018): 201–18. https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v16i2.1436.

———. Sanksi Perdata Dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2017.

Almansyah, Dimas, and Mohamad Fajri Mekka Putra. “Tanggungjawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Para Pihak Di Bawah Tekanan Dan Paksaan.” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW 5, no. 2 (November 27, 2022): 115–27. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i2.5728.

Arliman S, Laurensius. “Pemanggilan Notaris Dalam Rangka Penegakan Hukum Paska Perubahan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris.” Justitia et Pax 32, no. 1 (October 25, 2016): 32–47. https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v32i1.758.

Azhari, M. Edwin, and Djauhari Djauhari. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Nominee Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Kepemilikan Tanah Oleh Warga Negara Asing Di Lombok.” Jurnal Akta 5, no. 1 (March 5, 2018): 43. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2530.

Budiono, Herlien. Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata. 13th ed. Bandung: Citra Aditia Bakti, 2015.

Cahyanti, Nur, and Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. “Sanksi Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Akta 5, no. 1 (March 22, 2018): 288. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2617.

Din, Teresia. “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Akta Otentik Terindikasi Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 2 (June 26, 2019): 171. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.V19.171-183.

Eriyanti, Devi, and Fully Handayani Ridwan. “Peranan Notaris Dalam Kepastian Hukum Akta Kuasa Menjual Terhadap Objek Jual Beli Yang Pailitkan.” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW 5, no. 1 (May 5, 2022): 253. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4873.

Gumilang, Tia Sanitra. “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dan Akibat Hukum Pengesahan Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Melalui Sistem Administrasi Badan Hukum.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 4, no. 1 (January 1, 2019): 65–73. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol4.iss1.art8.

Handayani, Tri Ulfi, and Anis Mashdurohatun. “Urgensi Dewan Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Penegakan Kode Etik Notaris Di Kabupaten Pati.” Jurnal Akta 5, no. 1 (March 5, 2018): 51. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2531.

Hartati, Henny. “Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Notaris Pelaku Penggelapan Pajak Jual Beli Tanah (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 300/Pid.B/2015/PN.Dps.).” Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam 21, no. 1 (May 31, 2018): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2018.21.1.1-27.

HARYATI, FELISA. “Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris Terkait Persaingan Tidak Sehat Sesama Rekan Notaris Ditinjau Dari Peraturan Kode Etik Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (I.N.I).” Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist 3, no. 1 (December 14, 2018): 88–103. https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v3i1.93.

Khotimah, Khusnul, Arief Rahman, and Shinta Andriyani. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Akibat Adanya Pemalsuan Data Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah Di Hadapan Notaris.” Private Law 3, no. 2 (June 27, 2023): 468–79. https://doi.org/10.29303/prlw.v3i2.2610.

Kurniawan, Kurniawan. “Permasalahan Dan Kendala Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Melalui Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK).” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12, no. 1–17 (January 15, 2012). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.1.113.

Latifah, Latifah. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris.” Jurnal Officium Notarium 1, no. 1 (April 1, 2021): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol1.iss1.art15.

Lestari, Rika. “Perbandingan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Mediasi Di Pengadilan Dan Di Luar Pengadilan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 2 (January 16, 2013): 217. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v3i2.1819.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2019.

Maylaksita, Amanda. “Problematik Interpretasi Pengaturan Kepailitan Terhadap Jabatan Notaris Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 4, no. 1 (January 1, 2019): 71–90. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol4.iss1.art7.

Muljadi, Kartini, and Gunawan Widjaja. Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2007.

Muyassar, Muyassar, Dahlan Ali, and Suhaimi Suhaimi. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Notaris Terhadap Pengingkaran Akta Jual Beli Tanah Bersertipikat Oleh Pihak Yang Dirugikan.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 3, no. 1 (April 29, 2019): 147–66. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v3i1.12446.

Prasetyawati, Betty Ivana, and Paramita Prananingtyas. “Peran Kode Etik Notaris Dalam Membangun Integritas Notaris Di Era 4.0.” Notarius 15, no. 1 (April 30, 2022): 310–23. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v15i1.46043.

Rahman, Yofi Permana. “Pengaturan Penyerahan Protokol Notaris Yang Telah Meninggal Dunia Dan Prakteknya Di Provinsi Sumatera Barat.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 5, no. 1 (September 30, 2019): 1. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i1.120.

Rifiana, Agustin, Yetniwati Yetniwati, and Diana Amir. “Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Guna Mewujudkan Notaris Yang Berintegritas Di Era Globalisasi.” Wajah Hukum 6, no. 2 (October 14, 2022): 193. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.812.

Rosadi, Aulia Gumilang. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Sengketa Para Pihak Terkait Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (Ppjb) Yang Dibuatnya.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 5, no. 2 (March 30, 2020): 243. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.228.

Sakinah, Andara Skyla, and Siti Hajati Hoesin. “Implementasi Tugas Dan Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Pelaksanaan Transaksi Jual Beli Tanah (Studi Kasus Sengketa Tanah Di Wilayah Jakarta Barat).” PALAR | PAKUAN LAW REVIEW 8, no. 1 (June 30, 2022): 617–38. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v8i1.5628.

Sari, Indah. “Keunggulan Arbitrase Sebagai Forum Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan.” JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA 9, no. 2 (June 3, 2014): 87–102. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v9i2.354.

Septiarianti, Ni Kadek Sofia, I Nyoman Sumardika, and Ni Gusti Ketut Sri Astiti. “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Pengikatan Jual Beli.” Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 1, no. 1 (August 20, 2020): 143–47. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.1.1.2201.143-147.

Siallagan, Haposan. “Penerapan Prinsip Negara Hukum Di Indonesia.” Sosiohumaniora 18, no. 2 (2016): 131–37. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v18i2.9947.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v5i2.21163

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Halimi Halimi