PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE: PRAGMATIC PRESUPPOSITION IN MOTIVATIONAL SPEECH WITHIN DISCOURSE AND ITS RELEVANCE OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS TO REACH GOALS

Nurul Ulfa Nistiti

Abstract


This research was taken from online media in the form of a speech on a YouTube channel called the English Speeches Channel featuring an inspiring woman named Muniba Mazari Baloch. She is a Pakistani artist, model, activist, motivational speaker, singer, social reformer, and television host. Her motivational speech is titled we all are Perfectly Imperfect. This research accompaniment three research questions by analyzing the types of presuppositions contained in Muniba Mazari's speech and determining the type of presupposition in his speech that comes up with the confession discourse function, then knowing how far her confessions influences her audiencess through what he delivers. The research method used in this research is descriptive qualitative by analyzing several utterances in her speech, through two approaches of theory pragmatic presupposition and confessional discourse analysis. The results showed that Muniba Mazari used all types of pragmatic presuppositions (Existential, Factive, Non-Factive, Lexical, Structural, and Counterfactual). Through this type of presupposition, Muniba Mazari also brings out the function of confessional discourse. The function of confessional discourse contained in her speech is a therapeutic, didactic, and interrogatory function. During the research, researchers found the main threat from the combination of these two theories is the strength of Motivational Assertion. The main threat that became the main idea as the direction of Muniba Mazari's speech in motivating her audiences. Then, this main thread also asserts how powerful Muniba Mazari's speech was. In this context, the results bring about optimism, achievable objectives, passion, and confidence. Finally, Muniba Mazari's speech entitled We Are Perfectly Imperfect which contains many moral messages can be said to be a motivational speech. It can be manifested in learning-teaching process. The result of combining these two theories produces the main thread that can be applied by several teachers in motivating their students in the learning-teaching process.

Keywords


Types of Presupposition; Confessional Discourse; Speech; Motivational Speech; Teaching-learning process

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ariyanti, L., & Nistiti, N. U. (2019). Presupposition in Feminist Speech. 380(SoSHEC), 161–165.

Caffi, C. (2006). Pragmatic Presupposition. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 1936, 17–25.

Colomina-Almiñana, J. J. (2018). Pragmatic presupposition and unarticulated constituents. Lingua, 206, 112–126.

Creswell, J. W. (1991). Reseacrh Design. In Muqarnas (Vol. 8). SAGE Publications.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis the critical study of language, second edition. In Critical Discourse Analysis The Critical Study of Language, Second Edition.

Iversen, G., & Norpoth, H. (2011). Introduction commmunication studies. In Analysis of Variance. Routledge.

Kormos, J. (2014). Speech Production and Second Language Acquisition. In Speech Production and Second Language Acquisition.

Kubrick, S., & Clarke, A. C. (2001). Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics and Speech Recognition. In SPEECH and LANGUAGE PROCESSING An Introduction to Natural Language Processing Computational Linguistics and Speech Recognition.

Leeuwen, T. Van. (2008). Discourse and Practice. Oxford University Press.

Mandziuk, R. M. (2001). Confessional discourse and modern desires: Power and please in True Story magazine. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18(2), 174–193.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180128076

McBath, J. H., & Jeffrey, R. C. (1978). Defining Speech Communication. Communication Education, 27(3), 181–188.

Nirit Kadmon. (2001). Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus. Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Sapir, E. (1921). ¨Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech(Lengua: una introducción para estudio discursivo) (Vol. 15, Issue 18). Cambridge Library Collection.

Sarah J. Tracy. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. In Revija za sociologiju (Vol. 43, Issue 1). Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Stephen D. Lapan, Marylynn T. Quartaroli, F. J. R. (2012). Qualitative Reseacrh. Jossey-Bass.

Telg, R. (2011). Speech Writing and Types of Speeches 1. In University of florida (Issue August).

van der Sandt, R. A. (2015). Linguistic Presupposition. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (Second Edi, Vol. 13). Elsevier.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. In Areal Features of the Anglophone World. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315760483-11




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v15i2.12185

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Nurul Ulfa Nistiti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed By :

 width=  width=  width=   width=  width=  width=  width=

Publisher

Department of English
University of Trunojoyo, Madura
Jl. Raya Telang, Kamal - Bangkalan 69162

 

Prosodi: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra

ISSN: 1907-6665 (Print) ISSN: 2622-0474 (Online)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at journal.trunojoyo.ac.id