MINI GROUP DISCUSSION: COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN TEACHING READING

Maskhurin Fajarina; Sayid Ma’rifatullah

doi:10.21107/prosodi.v15i1.10491

MINI GROUP DISCUSSION: COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN TEACHING READING

Maskhurin Fajarina, Sayid Ma’rifatullah

Abstract

The aim of the research is to determine mini-group discussion as a cooperative learning in teaching reading. In the article, the method used is quantitative and descriptive qualitative which focus on teaching reading English text of Unhasy Students non-English department. It focus on some problems, those are How the implementation of mini group discussion (mindis) in teaching reading English and How the influence of (Mindis) into students’ enhancement in reading English comprehension. The researcher used test as an instrument and interview of the students. The result of the research are Mindis is easy to teach reading English in non-English department and it has significant influence into the students’ enhancement in reading English.

Keywords: mindis, teaching reading, students’ enhancement

Keywords

mindis; teaching reading; students’ enhancement

Full Text:

PDF

References

Brown, H. D. (2004). Teaching by Principles. New York: Longman.Churiyah, Faridatul, Retno Tri Hastutik. 2017. SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION METHOD IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION IN EIGHT GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 3 BANTUL IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2017/2018

Creswell, John W. 2010. Research Design:Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. California: Sage Publications, Inc McMillan J.H.

Girsa, Ahmad & Yulianti,Dita. (2018) Effective Methode of Teaching Reading (study case).Journal Bahasa Lingua Scientia vol 10(2) 275 November 2018

Grabe, William and Fredricka L. Stoller. 2011. Teaching and Researching Reading. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Johnson, D., Johnson, R., Roseth, C., & Shin, T. 2014. The relationship between motivation and achievement in interdependent situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12280

Lexy J. Moleong. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung

Manurrung, Paisal, Hari Sambayu. 2017 Meningogram Studi katkan Kemampuan Bahasa Inggris Mahasiswa/I Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FKIP-UNA dengan Literature Aproach.Prosiding Seminar NasionalMulti Disiplin Ilmu UNA.

Ningsih, Nur Hadi (2017). SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION METHOD IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION IN EIGHT GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 3 BANTUL IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2017/2018

Roseth, C., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. 2008. Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 223-246.

Saputra, Ahadi. 2016. The use of Two Stay Two Stray Strategy in Teaching Reading. Rnglish Educatin Journal 7(2), 219-232, April 2016

Slavin, R. 2014. Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Anales De Psicologia, 30, 785-791.

Slavin, R., Lake, C., Hanley, P. & Thurston, A. 2014. Experimental evaluations of elementary science programs: A best-evidence synthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 870-901.

Wall, H. (2014). When Guided Reading Isn’t Working: Strategies for Effective Instruction. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 10(2), 1–8. Retrieved from http://jolle.coe.uga.edu

Yulianti,Dita.(2014) Thesis: Improving the English Comprehension Ability of Grade 8 Students at SMP NEGERI 3 GEDANGSARI in the Academic Year of 2013/2014 through Extensive Reading Activities

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v15i1.10491