fatimatul munawaroh


Mathematic ability is indispensable for understanding and solving problems in Physics tasks. Based on the importance of the mathematic ability, the curriculum of Natural Science Education Program consists of mathematics courses namely Mathematics I and II. The purpose of this study is to determine the correlation of learning outcomes in Mathematics dan physics courses on the topic of Basic Substance, Heat and Optics. This study was conducted on the bachelor students of Natural Science Education Program on academic year 2015/2016 consisting of 3 classes that are class A, B and C. Students have covered the course of Mathematics I, Mathematics II and physics. Data obtained by documentation technique. The result of the analysis shows that there is a significant correlation between the learning result of Mathematics subject and the result of physics course study. The correlation index between Mathematics I and physics is 0.52; 0.34 and 0.23 for class A, B and C. While the correlation index between Mathematics II and physics are 0.27; 0.34 and 0.28 for classes A, B and C.

Keywords: Correlation, Mathematic abiliy, Physics


Awodun, Adebisi O., and OJO, Olanrewaju Adeniyi. 2013. Mathematics Skills as Predictors of Physics Students’ Performance in Senior Secondary Schools. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Volume 2 (7), 391-394.

Haryadi, R. dan Pujiastusti, H. 2015. Kemampuan Matematis terhadap Hasil belajar Fisika, Prosiding SKF, 174-177.

Hudson, H. Ti. and McIntire, W. R.. 1977. Correlation Between Mathematical Skills and Success in Physics. American Journal of Physics, Volume 45 (5), 470-471.

Kereh, C.T., Liliasari, T., P.C., and Sabandar, J.. 2014. Korelasi Penguasaan Matematika Dasar dengan Penguasaan Materi Pendahuluan Fisika Inti. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, Volume 45 (5), 470-471.

Li, Min, Shavelson, Richard J., Kupermintz, Haggai and Ruiz-Primo, M. A. 2002. On The Relationship Between Mathematics and Science Achievement in The United States. Secondary Analysis of the TIMSS Data, 233-249.

Meltzer, D. E.. 2002. The Relationship Between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A Possible “Hidden Variable” in Diagnostic Pretest Scores. American Journal of Physics, Volume 70 (12), 1259-1268.

Munawaroh, F. 2015. Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Pendidikan IPA dalam Menyelesaikan Materi Kinematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika. 128-132.

Ornek, F., Robinson, WR., Haugan, MP. 2008. What Makes Physics Difficult?. Interntional Jurnal of Inveromental&Science Education Vol 1(3), 30-34.

Serway, R. A. dan Jewett, J. W. 2009. Fisika untuk sains dan Teknik. Jakarta: Salemba Teknika

Shrestha, P. P. and Shields, D. R. 2008. Correlating Student Performance in Fundamental of Construction Science Course with Mathematics and Physics Grade Point Average. http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2009/paper/CEUE124002009.pdf, diakses 30 Maret 2017.

Usoro, H., Akpan, G.A., and Ukoro, E. A. 2008. Predicting Students’ Performances in Physics and Chemistry in The Nigerian Secondary Schools: Implication For Technical Education (A case of Multiple Correlation/Regretion). Halaman 113-122. http://globalacademicgroup.com/journals/the%20intuition/Predicting%20Students%E2%80%99%20Performance%20in%20Mathematics%20from%20their.pdf, diakses 31 Maret 2017.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/jps.v4i1.2859


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Jurnal Pena Sains Indexed by:

Directory of Open Access Journals                       Home         Find in a library with WorldCat                   Related image





 Creative Commons License

Jurnal Pena Sains is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright © 2014 Science Education Program Study, University of Trunojoyo Madura.