TEORI NOLTING : ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

Ulfatul Layyinah, Rahmad Fajar Sidik, Mochammad Ahied, Wiwin Puspita Hadi, Yamin Yamin

Abstract


The aim of this research is to determine students' learning styles as well as the average and types of errors based on Nolting's theory in solving light and optical instrument problems in terms of learning styles. This research uses quantitative descriptive methods. The population and sample are all class VIII students for the 2023/2024 academic year, totaling 26 people. Sampling used nonprobability sampling technique with saturation sampling type. Data collection uses tests, questionnaires and documentation. The research results show that: 1). 5 types of learning styles used by students; visual, auditory, kinesthetic, visual auditory, and auditory kinesthetic. The visual learning style is dominantly used in the classroom. 2) Average errors for types of learning styles, namely; a) The average visual learning style is 8, the type of error that is most often made is Careless Errors with 26 errors (31%). b) The average auditory learning style is 8, the type of error that is most often made is Careless Errors with 17 errors (28%). c) The average kinesthetic learning style is 10, the type of error that is most often made is Careless Errors with 15 errors (38%). d) The average visual auditory learning style is 5, the type of error that is most often made is Concept errors with 3 errors (60%). e) The average auditory kinesthetic learning style is 6, the type of error that is most often made is Concept errors with 6 errors (50%).


Keywords


light and optical devices, problem solving errors, Nolting theory, learning style.

References


Ainiyah, Q., Yuliati, L., & Parno, P. (2020). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep dan Kesulitan Belajar Materi Alat-Alat Optik pada Siswa Kelas XI MAN Tuban. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1), 24–29.

Astiti, N. D., Mahadewi, L. P. P., & Suarjana, I. M. (2021). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Mimbar Ilmu, 26(2), 193–203.

Azis, S., Ulfa, A. Y., Akbar, F., Mutiah, H., & Halijah. (2022). Analisis Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditori, dan Kinestetik (VAK) pada pada Pembelajaran Biologi Siswa SMAN 8 Bulukumba. Jurnal Bioshell: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, Biologi, Dan Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 2022.

Buton, S., Loilatu, S. H., & Wagola, W. K. (2023). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Berdasarkan Teori Nolting Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 25 Buru. Journal on Education, 05(02), 4701–4707.

Irianti, E. (2021). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Cahaya Menggunakan Four Tier Diagnostics Test. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Undiksha, 11(2), 1–10.

Izza, A. Z., & Mardhiyana, D. (2022). Analysis Of Students’ Errors Of Class Viii Mts Ath-Thohiriyyah In Solving Circle Material Problems Based On Nolting Theory. Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.33477/mp.v10i2.3059

Ningsih, T. A. W., Rakhmawan, A., Sutarja, M. C., Yamin, & Ahied, M. (2023). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Getaran, Gelombang, Dan Bunyi Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Natural Science Educational Research, 6(3), 64–72.

Nurchikmah, S. A. P., Siswanto, J., & Ristanto, S. (2022). Analisis Korelasi Kesadaran Metakognisi Dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA. Lontar Physics Today, 1(3), p 133 – 142.

Nurul, D. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Pada Pesera Didik Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pendidikan JURINOTEP, 1(1), 1–120. https://doi.org/10.46306/jurinotep.v1i1

Rahma, S., Efendy, R., & Herawaty, H. (2022). Analysis Of Student Errors In Solving Problems Of Device And Root Form Based On Nolting Theory In Class Ix Ponpes Al-Ikhlas Addary Mts Ddi Takkalasi. Jurnal Prinsip Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.33578/prinsip.v4i2.118

Rambe, M. S., M.Pd.Kons, & Yarni, N. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, Dan Kinestetikterhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Sma Dian Andalas Padang. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 2(2), 291–296.

Salsabila, S. P., Guruh Sukma, H., Ratnawati, V., & Arofah, L. (2023). Buku Panduan Permainan Dam Quiz Sebagai Media Untuk Melatih Keterbukaan Diri. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 229–240.

Sukmawati, S., & Amelia, R. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Segiempat Berdasarkan Teori Nolting. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 3(5), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i5.423-432

Sutrisna, N., & Gusnidar. (2022). Pengembangan Buku Siswa Berbasis Inkuiri Pada Materi Ipa Untuk Siswa Kelas Viii Smp. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(8), 2859–2868.

TUMANGGOR, A. M. R., Jumadi, J., Wilujeng, I., & Ringo, E. S. (2019). The Profile of Students’ Physics Problem Solving Ability in Optical Instruments. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05104

Ulpa, F., Marifah, S., Maharani, S. A., & Ratnaningsih, N. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kontekstual pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Ditinjau dari Teori Nolting. Square : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.21580/square.2021.3.2.8651

Wahyuni, R. A. (2020). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ipa Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Predict, Discuss, Explain,Observe, Discuss, Explain (Pdeode). Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 477–486.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v7i3.27059

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.