Analysis of Competitiveness and Factors Affecting the Level of Potato Export to Singapore and Malaysia

Desi Nurfiana Fauziah, - Riniati, Sunlip Wibisono

Abstract


This study purpose to analyze competitiveness and the factors that influence the level of Indonesian potato exports in Singapore and Malaysia. The analytical method used in this study is the quantitative Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) method, Export Product Dynamic (EPD), and OLS analysis. The destination countries for potato exports in Indonesia are Singapore and Malaysia. This study uses annual time series data from 1989 to 2018. The results of the RCA analysis show that Indonesian potatoes have strong competitiveness in Singapore in 1999-2017, although in 1999-2003 the value of Singapore RCA was inferior to Malaysia. Whereas in Malaysia, Indonesian potatoes have strong competitiveness only in 1999-2006. The results of analysis of Indonesian potato EPD on the Singapore market are in a retreat position and Malaysia is in a lost opportunity
position. The results of OLS analysis in both countries show that the variable that has a significant effect on the level of potato exports is the GDP of the destination country and the real exchange rate. While the price of exports only affects Singapore.

This study purpose to analyze competitiveness and the factors that influence the level of
Indonesian potato exports in Singapore and Malaysia. The analytical method used in
this study is the quantitative Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) method, Export
Product Dynamic (EPD), and OLS analysis. The destination countries for potato exports
in Indonesia are Singapore and Malaysia. This study uses annual time series data from
1989 to 2018. The results of the RCA analysis show that Indonesian potatoes have strong
competitiveness in Singapore in 1999-2017, although in 1999-2003 the value of Singapore
RCA was inferior to Malaysia. Whereas in Malaysia, Indonesian potatoes have strong
competitiveness only in 1999-2006. The results of analysis of Indonesian potato EPD
on the Singapore market are in a retreat position and Malaysia is in a lost opportunity
position. The results of OLS analysis in both countries show that the variable that has a
significant effect on the level of potato exports is the GDP of the destination country and
the real exchange rate. While the price of exports only affects Singapore.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu Hatab, A., & Romstad, E. (2014). Competitiveness analysis of Egyptian cotton exports with special focus on the Chinese market. China Agricultural Economic Review, 6(2), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-02-2013-0026

Hiziroglu, M., Hiziroglu, A., & Hulusi Kokcam, A. (2013). An investigation on competitiveness in services: Turkey versus European Union. Journal of Economic Studies, 40(6), 775–793. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-10-2011-0128

Hoang, V. V. (2020). Investigating the agricultural competitiveness of ASEAN countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 47(2), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-10-2018-0366

Jayawickrama, A., & Thangavelu, S. M. (2010). Trade linkages between China, India and Singapore: Changing comparative advantage of industrial products. Journal of Economic Studies, 37(3), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443581011061267

Kea, S., Li, H., Shahriar, S., & Abdullahi, N. M. (2020). Relative export competitiveness of the Cambodian rice sector. British Food Journal, 122(12), 3757–3778. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2019-0950

Maryam, J., Banday, U. J., & Mittal, A. (2018). Trade intensity and revealed comparative advantage: An analysis of Intra-BRICS trade. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(5), 1182–1195. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-09-2017-0365

Rundassa, M. W., Azene, D. K., & Berhan, E. (2019). Comparative advantage of Ethiopian textile and apparel industry. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, 23(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-08-2018-0049

Saki, Z., Moore, M., Kandilov, I., Rothenberg, L., & Godfrey, A. B. (2019). Revealed comparative advantage for US textiles and apparel. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 29(4), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-03-2018-0025

Sheetal, S., Kumar, R., & Shashi, S. (2020). Export competitiveness and concentration analysis of major sugar economies with special reference to India. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 10(5), 687–715. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-07-2019-0096

Shuai, J., Huang, F., Leng, Z., & Cheng, X. (2019). International competitiveness of China’s biomass products: A CMS and RCA analysis. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 14(3), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-05-2019-0013

Supongpan Kuldilok, K., Dawson, P. J., & Lingard, J. (2013). The export competitiveness of the tuna industry in Thailand. British Food Journal, 115(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701311314174

Wei, H., & Chunming, Z. (2012). The comparative advantage of Chinese manufactured exports. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 5(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/17544401211233507

Widodo, T. (2008). Dynamic changes in comparative advantage: Japan “flying geese” model and its implications for China. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 1(3), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/17544400810912365




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/mediatrend.v16i1.5788



Copyright (c) 2021 Media Trend

Creative Commons License

Mediatrend © 2015 - Journal of Economic & Development Studies | Development Economics Program - Faculty of Economics and Bussiness, Trunojoyo University
DESKRIPSI GAMBAR DESKRIPSI GAMBAR