Analysis of The Effect of Remittance on Economic Growth in Developing Countries East Asia and Pacific Region

Firdan Belado Romadona, Wisnu Wibowo, Hairul Rahman

Abstract


This study determine how remittances affect economic growth in the developing
countries of East Asia and the Pacific region. The type of data in this study is
secondary data with the form of panel data. This research was conducted in the
period 2000-2019 in 11 developing countries in East Asia and the Pacific region.
This study used Random Effect Model estimation to determine the influence of
independent variables, namely GDP per capita with dependent variables, namely
remittances, working-age population, FDI, and trade openness. The result shows
that variable remittances and working-age populations positively and significantly
impact economic growth in developing countries in East Asia and the Pacific region.
The estimated results for FDI variables negatively and significantly affect developing
countries economic growth in East Asia and the Pacific region. Estimates for trade
openness variables have no significant effect on developing countries economic
growth in East Asia and the Pacific region.


Keywords


This study determine how remittances affect economic growth in the developing countries of East Asia and the Pacific region. The type of data in this study is secondary data with the form of panel data. This research was conducted in the period 2000-2019

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atmaja, H. K., & Mahalli, K. (2015). Pengaruh Peningkatan Infrastruktur Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Kota Sibolga. Jurnal Ekonomi, 3.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 1994. Surabaya dalam Angka. Surabaya: BPS Kota Surabaya.

_________________. 1996. Surabaya dalam Angka. Surabaya: BPS Kota Surabaya.

_________________. 1999. Surabaya dalam Angka. Surabaya: BPS Kota Surabaya.

_________________. 2002. Surabaya dalam Angka. Surabaya: BPS Kota Surabaya.

_________________. 2003. Surabaya dalam Angka. Surabaya: BPS Kota Surabaya.

_________________. 2005. Surabaya dalam Angka. Surabaya: BPS Kota Surabaya.

_________________. 2008. Surabaya dalam Angka. Surabaya: BPS Kota Surabaya.

_________________. 2011. Surabaya dalam Angka. Surabaya: BPS Kota Surabaya.

_________________. 2019. Surabaya dalam Angka. Surabaya: BPS Kota Surabaya.

Gujarati, Damodar N, dan Porter, D. C. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Ekonometrika. Salemba Empat.

Khan, H. et al. (2020). Impact of infrastructure on economic growth in South Asia : Evidence from pooled mean group estimation. The Electricity Journal, 33(5).

Kumari, A., & Sharma, A. K. (2017). Physical & social infrastructure in India & its relationship with economic development. World Development Perspectives, 5, 30–33.

Lee, K et al. (2020). Does Household Electrification Supercharge Economic Development. Journal of Economic Perspective, 34(1), 122–144.

Maryaningsih, N., Hermansyah, O., & Savitri, M. (2014). Pengaruh Infrastruktur terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 17, 61–98.

Palei, T. (2015). Assessing The Impact of Infrastructure on Economic Growth and Global Competitiveness. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23

Sahoo, P., & Dash, R. K. (2014). Infrastructure development and economic growth in India. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, November 2014, 37–41.

Shantz, H., Kitchens, K. E., & Rosenbloom, S. (2011). The Effects of Highway Infrastructure on Economic Activity. In Highway Infrastructure and the Economy. 14–42.

Todaro, Michael P dan Smith, S. C. (2011). Pembangunan Ekonomi (Sebelas). Erlangga.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/mediatrend.v16i2.10052



Copyright (c) 2021 Media Trend

Creative Commons License

Mediatrend © 2015 - Journal of Economic & Development Studies | Development Economics Program - Faculty of Economics and Bussiness, Trunojoyo University
DESKRIPSI GAMBAR DESKRIPSI GAMBAR