Studi Komparasi Perilaku Kreatif Mahasiswa Menghadapi Dunia Kerja (Pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Manajemen FEB di UTM)

Anis Binti Hamed, Mochammad Isa Anshori

Abstract


This research was conducted to find out how students'creative behavior in facing the world of work. The research method used in this research is to use qualitative methods.And this research uses purposive sampling technique, namely the method of taking informants or data sources with certain considerations or certain criteria. These particular considerations, for example the person who is considered to know the most about what we expect, or maybe he is the ruler so that it will make it easier for researchers to explore the object or social situation to be studied. In this study using management students with the following criteria: 1. Trunojoyo Madura University students, 2.Management students, 3. 7th Semester Management students, 4. Students who after graduating from college want to work immediately. From the explanations of informants (A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5) who have been interviewed, the factors that encourage students after graduating from college to want to work immediately differ from one another. Some are caused by impulses from within himself (internal factors) and some are caused by encouragement or stimulation from the outside environment (external factors). However, most of the statements from the informants were influenced by internal factors, namely the desire of themselves, but some were influenced by external factors such as support from parents that made the informant melt and thought that the parents' decision must be the best    for him and the informant accepted suggestions from his parents. So it can be concluded that internal factors have a stronger influence because based on the statements of the five informants, four of the informants chose the job because of their own desires, and some were suggested by their parents and students could accept the sesuggestions without an element of coercion because after consideration it was goodness for him.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul zuhad. 2010. Studi komparasi prestasi belajar mahasiswa antara yang aktivis dan yang nonaktivis program s.1 angkatan 2004 di Iain walisongo semarang. Institut Agama Islam Negeri Walisongo.

Abdurrahman dan Suarti. 2016. Pengembangan instrumen sikap kreatif mahasiswa programstudi bimbingan dan konseling (the development of an instrumentfor students creative attitudes of guidance and counseling). FIP IKIPMataram.

Agusta, Y. 2015. Hubungan Antara Orientasi Masa Depan dan Daya Juang Terhadap Kesiapan Kerja pada Mahasiswa Tingkat Akhir Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik di Universitas Mulawarman. Jurnal Psikologi,3(1),369-381.

Agustina S.2014. Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Hipertensi Pada Lansia di Atas Umur 65 Tahun. Jurnal Kesehatan Komunitas. Vol. 2, No. 4.

Ali, M., & Asrori, M.2010. Psikologi Remaja : Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Ariani, Emiliantisonia 2019. Pengaruh efikasi diri, lotus pengendalian dan faktor demografis terhadap kematangan karir Mahasiswa Semester VII dan IX Universitas Trunojoyo Madura Tahun 2018/2019. pta.trunojoyo.ac.id, diunduh pada 09 Desember 2020.

Aswin, Asrori, dan Asturi, Indri. 2016. “Pengaruh persepsi dunia kerja terhadap perencanaan karir peserta didik kelas xi sosial SMA “. FKIP Untan Pontianak.

Azwar, Saifuddin. 2010. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Baiti, Rizki Diah dan Abdullah, Sri Muliati dkk. 2017. “Career Self- Efficacy Dan Kesiapan Kerja Pada Mahasiswa Semester Akhir” Jurnal Psikologi Integratif/Vol. 5, (Hlm. 128-141). Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta.

Boden, Margaret A. 2010. The Creative Mind Myths and Mechanisms. London: Routledge.

Brady, R. P. 2010. Work Readiness InventoryAdministrator’s Guide. Diunduh dari http://www.jist.com/work-readiness-inventoryadministratorsguidepdf ,24/09/20.

Curtis, S. & Shani, N. 2012. The Effect of Taking Paid Employment During Term-time on Students' Academic Studies. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(2),129-138. di akses tanggal 23 Desember 2013

Dwi Kencana Wulan. 2019. Rancangan Program Pelatihan Karakter Kreatif pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengukuran Psikologi.

Gunawan imam. 2013. Metode penelitian kualitatif Teori dan Praktik.Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Hutahaean, Erik Saut. 2010. “Kontribusi Pribadi Kreatif dan Iklim Organisasi Terhadap Perilaku Inovatif “(hlm. 23-24). Jakarta: Universitas Gunadarma.

Indrawijaya, Adam I. 2010. Perilaku Organisasi Sinar Baru. Algasindo.Bandung.

Iqbal Hasan, 2012, Analisis Data Penelitian dengan Statistik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Izzatyl Zakiah. 2014. Mendorong Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran Matakuliah kajian teks Kurikulum Kimia SMA. Aceh. Lantanida Journal, Vol. 2 No.2

Kartina Kartono. 2011. Psikologi Abnormal. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Latif, Mukhtar dkk. 2013 OrientasiBaru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Jakarta:Kencana.

Lewin, Kurt. 2009. Action Research and Minority Problems The Action Research Reader. 3rd ed. Victoria : Deakin University.

Lihayati, Khoirul. 2018. Pengaruh Daya Juang Kesiapan Kerja Melalui Efikasi Diri Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Trunojoyo Madura). pta.trunojoyo.ac.id, diunduh pada 09 Desember 2020. M.,

Sunaryo. 2014. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Sikap Konsumen dan Minat Pembelian Produk Handbag Merek Tiruan. Jurnal aplikasi, 12 (4).

Merlyawati Priyantini, Harti. 2015. Pengaruh kreativitas terhadap self efficacy mahasiswa jurusan pendidikan ekonomi fakultas ekonomi unesa. Surabaya.

Meyta Pritandari. 2017. Implementasi model pembelajaran direct instruction untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan ekonomi UM Metro.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2012. Metodologi PenelitianKualitatif,PenerbitPT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset, Bandung.

Munandar, Utami. 2011. Pengembangan Kreativitas anak Berbakat. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Nazzal LJ. 2020. The Relationship of the Quality of Creative Problem Solving Stages to Overall Creativity in Engineering Students. ELSAVIER. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100734.

Piers Steel, 2010. “The Nature Of Procrastination: Meta-Analitic And Theorytical Of Queentestional Self-Regulatory Failure”. Journal Of Psuchological Bulletin.

Pool,L.D.,&Sewell,P.2010.TheKeyTo Employability: Developing A Practical Model Of Graduate Employability. Journal Education And Training, 9(4), 277-289. Diunduh pada tanggal 28 November 2020.

Renzulli, J.S. (2010). The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson, Conception of Giftedness (pp. 246 - 279). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Santrock. J. W. 2010. Adolescence: Perkembangan Remaja. (edisi keenam) Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sardiman, A.M. 2011. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. PT Rajagrafindo: Jakarta.

Saryono. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian KesehatanPenuntunPraktisBagi Pemula.Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia.

Shohifatul, Izzah. 2012. Perbedaan tingkat self-efficacy antara mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi dan Sains dan Teknologi UIN Malang. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Islam Negeri Malang.

Slameto. 2010. Belajar dan faktor- faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Sudjana Nana. 2014. Penelitian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: IKAPI.

Suherman, Uman.dkk. 2010. Evaluasi dan pengembangan program bimbingan dan Konseling di Sekolah. Bandung; JPPB FIP IKIP.

Sujono, Bambang dan Yuliani Nurani Sujiono. 2007. Bermain Kreatif Berbasis Kecerdasan Jamak. Jakarta: PT. Indek

Sunaryo. 2011. Psikologi Untuk Pendidikan. Jakarta: EGC.

Suwarto. 2010. Perilaku keorganisasian. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.Theory. New Jersey: PrenticeHall.

Umam, Khaerul. 2010. Perilaku Organisasi. Bandung: Cv. Pustaka Setia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/jkim.v2i1.15520

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.