The Binding Power of the Peace Agreement in the Event of a Breach of Contract

Ferdiansyah Putra Manggala, Ariel Alfito Catur Nanda

Abstract


A peace deed is a legal instrument important for resolving civil disputes,
especially defaults. A peace deed executed in a default lawsuit has
executory power equal to a judge’s decision and can serve as a basis to
request court execution if a party fails to fulfill obligations. This research
aims to determine the peace deed’s binding power, legal protection for the
aggrieved party, and remedies available for breaches. The method used is
normative juridical with legislative and conceptual approaches. Although
prior research exists on peace deeds, this study differs in its results. First,
the peace deed is binding and final for the parties, as it is considered to
have resolved the case and any potential related disputes, thereby
precluding further legal remedies. Second, if a party violates the deed’s
terms, legal protection may be sought internally through agreed sanctions
or fines stipulated in the deed, or externally by filing an executory
application consistent with the deed’s executory nature. Third, breaches
of the deed can also be resolved by renewed mediation between the parties
outside court to obtain an amicable solution. The findings highlight the
deed’s dual role as both a settlement instrument and a basis for
enforcement, while also emphasizing alternative dispute resolution when
violations occur.


Keywords


Peace Deed, Default, Executorial

References


Abdul Rokhim and Dewi Fatmawati. “Akibat Hukum Dari Pembatalan Perjanjian Kerjasama.” Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora 3, no. 1 (January 2024): 237–46. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v3i1.2582.

Agustina, Amaliasyifa, and Suwaebatul Aslamiyah. “Perlindungan Hukum Dan Penyelesaian Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Debitur Cidera Janji Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19.” YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 8, no. 1 (April 2022): 87–94. https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v8i1.123.

Ali Murtadho, Nazhif. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kreditor Preferen dalam Pemberesan Proses Kepailitan.” Journal of Contemporary Law Studies 1, no. 4 (July 2024): 207–26. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i3.2499.

Azizah, Azizah. “PERSPEKTIF PENGEMBANGAN ANALISIS PENDEKATAN STRUKTUR DALAM PERJANJIAN PENETAPAN HARGA.” Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 9, no. 1 (July 2023): 1. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v9i1.2679.

Dewi, Vinka Kurnia, and Ferdiansyah Putra Manggala. URGENSIPEMBEBANANJAMINANFIDUSIA PADAKONTENYOUTUBEYANGTELAH MEMILIKIIKLAN(ADSENSE). n.d.

Hartono, Rafli, Andika Putra Eskanugarah, Haykhal Shokat Ali, Ibrahim Zainal Akbar, Oktamalia Hasanahhaq, Ferdiansyah Putra Manggala, Fiska Maulidian, et al. BANTUAN HUKUM : PERAN BANTUAN HUKUM DALAM MEWUJUDKAN DAN MENINGKATKAN AKSES KEADILAN. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Jember: UPA Penerbitan Universitas Jember, 10.

Hirsanuddin, Hirsanuddin, and Sudiarto Sudiarto. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak (Kreditur Dan Debitur) Melalui Parate Executie Obyek Hak Tanggungan.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 9, no. 1 (April 2021): 253–67. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i1.890.

I Made Agus Dwi Mandala Putra, I. Nyoman Putu Budiarta, and I. Nyoman Subamia. “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN MELALUI PERDAMAIAN.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 3, no. 3 (December 2022): 544–50. https://doi.org/10.55637/jph.3.3.5588.544-550.

Imelda, Fransiska, and Arsin Lukman. “Akibat Hukum Akta Jaminan Fidusia yang Dibuat di Bawah Tangan dalam Kredit Motor.” Jurnal Supremasi, February 28, 2023, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v13i1.1990.

Juanda, Enju. “HUBUNGAN HUKUM ANTARA PARA PIHAK DALAM PERJANJIAN PEMBIAYAAN KONSUMEN.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 9, no. 2 (September 2021): 273. https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v9i2.6256.

Juliati Br Ginting. “KEKUATAN MENGIKAT PERJANJIAN SECARA LISAN.” The Juris 6, no. 2 (December 2022): 429–36. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i2.612.

Kiscya Anastasya Mottoh, Rietha Lieke Lontoh, and Helena Benedicta Tambajong. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Pegadaian Terhadap Konsumen Atas Rusaknya Objek Jaminan Gadai.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (n.d.).

Manggala, Ferdiansyah Putra, and Vinka Kurnia Dewi. “Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual Akibat Wanprestasi oleh Para Pelaku Usaha Ekonomi Kreatif.” Wajah Hukum 8, no. 1 (April 2024): 290. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v8i1.1398.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Revisi. Revisi 13. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Pembayun, Eys Putri, and Arifin Faqih Gunawan. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen dalam Transaksi Digital: Tinjauan terhadap Implementasi UU Perlindungan Konsumen di Marketplance.” Jurnal Fakta Hukum 3, no. 2 (June 2025): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.58819/jfh.v3i2.156.

Prasetyo, Jody Lintang, Muhammad Farhan, Athallah Raihan Akbar, Muhammad Eriawan Haromain, and Rabbani Hidayat. KEPUTUSAN HAKIM DAN KEJAKSAAN TERHADAP PENAMBANGAN ILEGAL DI INDONESIA. 7, no. 1 (2025).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v7i1.32183

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Lisensi Creative Commons
Iniciolegis  is licensed under  Lisensi Internasional Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 .

Abstracts and Indexing

This journal is indexed in  Google Scholar ,  Garuda.kemendikbud ,  Dimensions ,  Crossref , dan Sinta