MENUJU SISTEM PENGENDALIAN MANAJEMEN BERTANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL STUDI PADA PT. PELINDO MARINE SERVICE SURABAYA

Nurul Kompyurini

Abstract


This study has two objectives. First, to find out how corporate social responsibility (CSR) is defined, and second, to find out whether CSR has been integrated in the management control system (MCS). The theoretical foundation is built from various research articles and literature on corporate social responsibility and management control systems. The object of this research was PT. Pelindo Marine Service Surabaya (PT. PMS). The data in this study comes from interviews with company management.

The findings in this study are that the company cannot determine the objectives of social responsibility related to its stakeholders. This contributes to the absence of integration of social responsibility into the MCS. The lack of social responsibility goals related to stakeholder groups has caused the integration of these aspects into MCS to be hampered, and this has the potential to reflect the organization's seriousness in following its stakeholder approach.


Keywords


corporate social responsibility, man-agement control system

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, C.A. 2002. Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social reporting and ethical report-ing: Beyond current theorizing, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal Vol. 15 No. 2: 223-250.

Adams, C.A., McNicholas P. 2007. Making a difference. Sustainability reporting, accountability and organ-izational change, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal Vol. 20 No. 3: 382-402.

Anthony, R.N. 1965. Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Anthony, R.N., Govindarajan V. 2004. Management Control Systems. Eleventh Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Berry, A.J., Coad, A.F., Harris, E.P., Otley, D.T., Stringer, C. 2009. Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature, The British Accounting Review 41, 2-20.

Cramer, J. 2002. From Financial to Sustainable profit, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 9, 99-106.

Cravens, K.S., Oliver, E.G. 2006. Employees: The key link to corporate reputation management, Business Horizons 49, 293-302.

Deegan, C., Blomquist, C. 2006. Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration on the inter-action between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 343-372.

Durden, C. 2008. Towards a socially responsible management control system, Accounting, Auditing and Ac-countability Journal Vol. 21 No. 5, 671-694

Epstein, M.J., Roy, M-J. 2001. Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the Key Performance Drivers, Long Range Planning 34, 585-604.

Gray, R. 2006. Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organizational value creation? Whose value? Whose creation?, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 6, 793-819.

Guthrie, J., Cuganesan, S., Ward, L. 2008. Industry specific social and environmental reporting: The Aus-tralian Food and Beverage Industry, Accounting Forum 32, 1-15.

Jung, E.J., Kim, J.S., Rhee, S.K. 2001. The measurement of corporate environmental performance and its application to the analysis of efficiency in oil industry, Journal of cleaner production, 9, 551-563.

Malmi, T., Brown, D.A. 2008. Management control systems as a package – Opportunities, challenges and research directions, Management Accounting Research, 19, 287-300.

Morsing, M., Oswald, D. 2009. Sustainable leadership: management control systems and organizational culture in Novo Nordisk A/S, Corporate Governance, Vol. 9 No.1, 83-99.

Niskala, M., Pajunen, T., Tarna-Mani, K. 2009. Yhteiskuntavastuun raportointi, raportointi- ja laskentaperi-aatteet, KTH-Media Oy, Keuruu.

Niskala, M., Pretes, M. 1995. Environmental reporting in Finland: A note on the use of annual reports, Ac-counting, Organizations and Society 20 (6):457-466.

Norris, G., O’Dwyer, B. 2004. Motivating socially responsive decision making: the operation of management controls in a socially responsive organization, The British Accounting Review, 36, 173-196.

O’Dwyer, B. 2002. Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure – An Irish Story, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, 406-436.

Perrini, F., Tencati, A. 2006. Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: The Need for New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Systems, Business Strategy and the Environment 15, 296-308.

Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. 2006. Strategy & Society. The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84 Issue 12, 78-92.

Post, J.E., Preston, L.E., Sachs, S. 2002. Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. Cali-fornia Management Review 45(1), 6-28.

Simons, R. 1995. Levers of Control, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Tuomela, T-S. 2005. The interplay of different levers of control: A case study of introducing a new perfor-mance measurement systems, Management Accounting Research, 16, 293-320.

van den Brink, T. van der Woerd, F. 2004. Industry Specific Sustainability Benchmarks: An ECSF Pilot Bridging Corporate Social Sustainability with Social Responsible Investments, Journal of business Ethics, 55, 187-203.

Weber, M. 2008. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement ap-proach for CSR, European Management Journal, 26, 247-261.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v15i1.5487

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Nurul Kompyurini

Creative Commons License

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.