KEADILAN DISTRIBUTIF SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERATING DALAM HUBUNGAN PARTISIPASI ANGGARAN DAN KINERJA DINAS

Wahyudin Nor

Abstract


This present research examined the effects that participation in budget preparation and the performances of government offices in Palangka Raya. These offices that turned to be executive elements of local government, were directly involved in budget preparation and served as working unit providing public services. Distributive justice perception were treated as moderating variable of this research. Samples taken in the research, were involved government offices in Palangka Raya. Analysis units utilized were the heads of offices, since they were mostly involved in budget processing in the offices. Data were collected through questionnaires, out of 82 questionnaires sent, only 48 questionnaires could be processed. The empirical result using simple regression showed that budget participation significantly effect on performance of government offices in Palangka Raya. But empirically result using residual approach showed that a fit between budget participation with contingent factor (distributive justice) does not effect performance significantly.

Keywords


Budget Participation, Distributive Justice, Performance, Contingency Theory and Residual Approach

References


Brownell, P. dan M. Mc. Innes. 1986. Budgetary Participation, Motivation, and Managerial Performance. The Accounting Review. 61 October. 587-600.

Bryan and Locke. 1967. Goal Setting as a Means of Increasing Motivation, and Managerial Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 52 June: 274-277.

Cohen, R.L. 1987. Distributive Justice: Theory and Research. Social Justice Re¬search 1: 19-40.

Cropanzano Russel S, Schminke M and Maureen L. Ambrose. 2000. The Effect of Organizational Structure on Perceptions of Prosedural Fairness. Journal Of Applied Psychology. Vol. 85, No. 2, 294-304.

Dunk. A.S. 1989, Budgetary participation, Agreement on Evaluation Criteria and Managerial Performance: A Research Note, Accounting Organization and Society, Vol. 14: 321-324.

Frucot Veronique and Shearon Winston T. 1991. Budgetary Participation, Locus of Control and Mexican Managerial Performance and Job Satisfaction. The Accouting Review. January: 80-89.

Ghozali, Imam. 2001. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gilliland, S.W. 1993 The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organiza¬tional Justice Perspective. Academy of Management Review 18 (4): 694-734.

Govidarajan. V. 1986. Impact of Participation in Budgetary Process on Managerial Attitude and Performance: Universalistic and Contengency Perspective, Decision Sciences: 496-516.

Greenberg. J. 1993. The Social Side of Fairness: Interpersonal and Informational Classes of Organizational Justice. In R. Cropanzano. Justice in The Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management. 79-103. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.

Halim, Abdul. 2002. Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah. Edisi Pertama. Salemba Empat. Jakarta

Indriantoro, Nur. dan Supomo, Bambang. 1999. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Edisi pertama. BPFE-Yogyakarta.

Kren, Leslie. 1992. Budgetary Participation and Managerial Performance: The Impact of Information and Environmental Volatility. The Accounting Review. July.511-526.

Leventhal, G.S. 1980. What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? In Social Ex-change:Advances in Theory and Research, edited by K.J. Gergen, M.S. Green-berg, and R.H. Willis, 27-55.New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Libby,T. 1999. The Influence of Voice and Explanation on Performance in Partici-pative Budgeting Setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 24. 125-137.

Linquist, T.M. 1995. Fairness as an Antecedent to Participative Budgeting: Examining the Effects of Distributve justice, Procedural Justice and Reference Cognitions on Satisfaction and Performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research 7 (Fall): 122-147.

Magner, N dan Gary G. Johnson.1995. Municipal Official’s Reactions to Justice in Budgetary Resource. PAQ Winter. 439-436.

Milani, K. 1975. The Relationship of Participation in Budget-Setting to Industrial Su-pervisor Performance and Attitudes: A Field Study. The Accounting Review 50 (2): 274-283.

Murray, D. 1988. The Performance Effects of Participative Budgeting: An Integration of Intervening and Moderating Variables, Behavior Research in Accounting, Vol. 2: 104-123.

Riyadi, Slamet. 2000. Motivasi Dan Pelimpahan Wewenang Sebagai Variabel Moderating Dalam Hubungan Pengaruh Penyusunan Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manjerial. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia (JRAI) Vol. 3, No. 2.

Riyanto, Bambang. 1999. The effect of Attitude, Strategy and Decentralization on Effectiveness of Budget Participation, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia (JRAI), Vol. 2, No. 2, hal 269-286.

Riyanto, Bambang. 2001. Alternative Approach to Examining A Contigency Model in Accounting Research: A Comparation. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, Manajemen, Ekonomi. Vol. 1, No.12, hal 13-32.

Tyler, T.R. 1989.The Psychology of Procedural Justice: A Test of The Group Value Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (5): 830-838.

Wentzel, Kristin. 2002. The Influence of Fairness Perceptions and Goal Commitment on Managers Performance in A Budget Setting. Behavior Research in Accounting 14: 247-271.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v7i2.495

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)

Creative Commons License

Faculty of Economics, University of Trunojoyo Madura
© 2016