POLITICAL-ECONOMY ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE: LANDASAN BARU PEMBERDAYAAN BUMN

Nur Fadjrih Asyik

Abstract


The investigation study the role of government in influencing the economy. Initially, economists acknowledge the role of government is only limited to the provision of social overhead capital or infrastructure to facilitate economic development, but subsequent developments bear the thought that emphasized the need for government intervention in the economy wider to solve certain problems (Krueger, 1990). There are several factors that indicate aspects of the general weakness of state enterprises such as production costs, efficiency, labor costs, capital costs, customer feedback, innovation and flexibility, decision making, continuity of service, cost control, and the relation of ownership, performance, and status organization. Relative Balance Theory of which is a pragmatic approach that skewness is determined by balancing the emphasis of environmental conditions. In relation to accounting, management of privatization and corporatization in the performance report on the management company in terms of accountability in the form of financial statements by considering the company's goals.

Keywords


Political - Economy Accounting Perspective, BUMN, Theory of Equalization, Privatization

References


Anoraga, P. 1995. BUMN, Swasta, dan Koperasi. Pustaka Jaya. Jakarta.

Backer, L. C. 2009. Sovereign Investing in Times of Crisis: Global Regulation of Sovereign Wealth Funds, State Owned Enterprises and The Chinese Experience. Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems Vol. 19 No. 1.

Baiman, S. 1990. Agency Research in Managerial in Managerial Accounting: A Second Look. Accounting, Organization, and Society 15: 341-371.

Bastian, I. 2006. Partnership on Financing to Solve Limited Environmental Budget and Political Will as the Main Factor for Success: Case in the Yogyakarta City. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia Vol. 9 No. 3, September.

Boeninger, E. 1991. Goverment and Development: Issues and Constarins. Journal of Economics, Vol. 7 No. 6.

Burns, T. dan G.M. Stalker. 1961. The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.

Chaudhuri, M. D. 1990. Market Failure and Goverment Failure. Journal Of Economic Perspective. Vol. 4 No. 3. Summer.

Christie, A.A. dan J.L. Zimmerman. 1994. Efficient and Opportunistic, Choices of Accounting Procedures: Corporate Control Contest. The Accounting Review (Oktober): 539-566.

Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academic of Management Review 14: 57-74

Galbraith, J. 1973. Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Gordon. L.A. dan Miller. 1976. A Contingency Framework for the Design of Accounting Information Systems. Accounting, Organization, and Society. pp. 59-69.

Govindarajan, V. 1986. Impact of Participation in Budgetary Process on Management Attitude and Performance: Universalistic and Contingency Perspective. Decision Science. Vol. 17. No.4 (Fall): pp. 496-516.

Hamid, E. S. 1999. Peran dan Intervensi Pemerintah dalam Perekonomian. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan – Kajian Ekonomi Negara Berkembang. Vol. 4 No. 1.

Harrell, A. dan P.D. Harrison. 1994. An Incentive to Shirk, Privately Held Information, and Manager Project Evaluation Decision. Accounting, Organization, and Society 19: 569-577.

Heller, F.A. dan Yulk. 1969. Participation Managerial Decision-Making and Situational Variable. Organization Behavior and Human Performance. pp. 230.

Hellriegel, D. dan J.W. Slocum. 1978. Management: Contingency Approach. Addison-Wesley.

Jensen, M. C. dan W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.

Kamal, M. 2008. Corporate Governance in Indonesian State-Owned Enterprises: Is it on the Right Track? Macquarie University Law Working Paper No. 2008-30.

Krueger, A. O. 1990. Government Failures in Development. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 4 No. 3. Summer.

Mardjana, L. K. 1994. Korporatisasi dan Privatisasi sebagai Alternatif Pembenahan BUMN. Jurnal Keuangan dan Moneter, Jakarta. BPEK.

McPherson, M.P. 1986. The Promoise of Privatization. USAID.

Meier. M. G. 1995. Leading Issues in Economic Development. Edisi Keenam. New York. Oxford University Pressm.

Perkins, D. H. 1991. Economic System Reform in Developing Countries dalam Perkins dan M. Roemer, Reforming Economic System in Developing Countries. Working Paper. Cambridge. Massachusetts. Harvard Institute for International Development.

Pranoto, T. 2000. Konsep clan Perkembangan Privatisasi BUMN. Manajemen dan Usahawan Indonesia. No. 02 TH XXIX .Pebruari.

Sappington, D.E.M. dan J.G. Sidak. 2009. Competition Law for State Owned Enterprises. Antitrust Law Journal Vol. 71 No. 2 pp: 479-523.

Savas dan Stevens. 1990. In Privatizations. Madsen Pirie.

Scott, R.W. 2007. Financial Accounting Theory. Prentice – Hall International, Inc.

Stiglitz, J. E. 1986. Economics of The Public Sector. New York – London. WW Northon & Company.

Thompson, J.D. 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Vagliasindi, M. 2008. Governance Arrangements for State Owned Enterprises. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4542.

Wilopo. 2006. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Kecendrungan Kecurangan Akuntansi: Studi pada Perusahaan Publik dan Badan Usaha Milik Negara di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia Vol. 9 No. 3, September.

Woelfel, C. J. 1995. Memantau Kesehatan Perusahaan Melalui Laporan

Keuangan (terjemahan). Penerbit PT. Dinastindo Adiperkasa Int'l. Jakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v6i1.482

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 1970 Nur Fadjrih Asyik

Creative Commons License

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.