Mengulik Euforia Amnesti Pajak: Hukum-APBN-Utang-Pajak (Studi Kasus Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Kabupaten X)

Whedy Prasetyo

Abstract


This study aims to investigate Law. 11 of 2016 on Tax Amnesty dated July 1, 2016 which aims to increase tax revenues and encourage the transfer of assets abroad to the country (asset repatriation). A case study on Tax Office Primary Regency Xwith a qualitative approach is used in this study by showing the response of the presence of PSAK 70 on the Implementation of Asset Accounting (Treasures) and Liabilities (Debt) Tax Amnesty in a proportional perspective. The result is the growth of tax compliance in the motivation and mental attitude of the taxpayer through integrity, responsibility, discipline, accuracy, cooperation, honesty, visi onary, motivation and attitude to achieve tax functions as Budgeter, Regulern, Democracy, and Redistribution in tax amnesty. These four functions are a manifestation of the Law-APBN-Debt-Taxon tax realization targets, therefore tax is expected to be a form of public awareness (voluntary compliance) in contributingto the State through self assessment. Finally, the function of tax amnesty can be an economic tool for the welfare of the people, one of the sources of development financing, to encourage economic growth through the current development policy and it means to create job opportunities and other economic and business opportunities. So that the two parties between the government and WP have a synergistic relationship in recording and reporting the amount of taxes that become obligations, toward a fair tax revenue structure.


Keywords


Tax amnesty, law, tax compliance, revenue, and debt.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arnold, J. 2012. Improving the Tax System in Indo-

nesia.

Bagiada, I.M & Darmayasa, I.N. 2016. Tax Amnesty

Upaya Membangun Kepatuhan Sukarela. Proceding

Simposium

Nasional Vokasi Makassar.

-14 Mei.

Basrowi, M., & Soenyono. 2004. Teori Sosiologi

Dalam Tiga Paradigma. Cetakan 1. Yayasan

Kampusina. Surabaya.

Bentley, D. 1998. Taxpayer’s Rights. John Wiley &

Sons Ltd. Singapore.

Boniello, G. 2003. Italian Tax Amnesty is Back But

on Tougher Terms. Journal of International

Taxation, 14(4): 47-51.

Burton, R. 2009. Kajian Aktual Perpajakan. Penerbit

Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Fenochietto, R & Pessino, C. 2013. Understanding

Countries Tax Effort. Journal of Banking and

Finance, Vol. 47, hlm 98-109.

Handayani, D. 2008. “Analisis Hubungan Tingkat

Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi dengan

Penerimaan Pajak Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak

Pekanbaru Senapelan”. Jurnal Akuntansi

Keuangan dan Bisnis, Vol. 1, No. 1, hlm 1-13.

Kuncoro, H. 2016. Menerobos Mitos Fiskal. Opini.

Kompas, Sabtu 17 Desember.

Kurniawan, P., & Pamungkas, B. 2006. Penagihan

Pajak di Indonesia. Penerbit Bayu Media. Malang.

Kuswarno, E. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Komunikasi

Fenomenologi: Konsepsi, Pedoman, Dan Contoh Penelitiannya.

Penerbit Widya Padjadjaran. Bandung.

Lubis, I. 2007. “Kesadaran Self Assessment Menuju

Good Corporate Government”. Majalah Berita

Pajak, No.1587:15 Mei.

Miraza, B. 2005. Pajak Dalam Perspektif Ekonomi.

Paper. Majalah Berita Pajak.

Prasetyo, W. 2008. “Analisis Tax Planning Pajak

Penghasilan Pasal 21 Karyawan Terhadap Pajak

Penghasilan Terutang Badan (PPh Pasal 25)

(Studi Survei Pada Wajib Pajak Badan Yang

Diperiksa Kantor Pemeriksaan dan Penyidikan

Pajak Malang”. Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas

Jember, Vol. 6, N0. 2, hlm 1-22.

Prasetyo, W. 2011. “Pemeriksaan Pajak dan Peranannya

pada Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak dan Petugas

Pajak”. Jurnal Ekonomi Akuntansi dan

Manajemen, Vol. X, No. 2, hlm 21-34.

Prasetyo, W. 2016. Menjamin Kepatuhan Wajib

Pajak Melalui Penerbitan Surat Tagihan Pajak.

Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, Vol. 7, No.

, hlm-. Prasetyo, W. 2017. Euforia Tax Amnesty. Makalah.

Dipresentasikan Pada Kuliah Tamu yang diadakan

oleh HMJA PSDKU Universitas Airlangga

Banyuwangi, Banyuwangi:07 Juni.

Prastowo, Y. 2012. Kegagalan Reformasi Pajak?

Opini. Kompas, Senin 30 Juli.

Ragimun. 2014. Analisis Implementasi Pengampunan

Pajak di Indonesia.

www.kemenkeu.go.id.

Rusydi, M.K. 2013. “Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan

terhadap Aggressive Tax Avoidance Di Indonesia”.

Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, Vol. 4,

No. 2, hlm 323-329.

Tambunan, R. 2015. Mengupas Sunset Policy dan

Tax Amnesty: Senjata Kejar Target Pajak.

www.pajak.go.id

Torgler, B., & Schaltegger, C.A. 2001. Tax amnesties

and Political Participation. Public Finance Review,

(3): 403-431.

Widodo, W. 2010. Moralitas, Budaya dan Kepatuhan

Pajak. Penerbit Alfabeta.

Bandung.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v14i1.4260

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Whedy Prasetyo

Creative Commons License

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.