IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NO 46 TAHUN 2013 PADA LAPORAN KEUANGAN WAJIB PAJAK BADAN DI MATARAM

Henny - Henny

Abstract


This study aims to explain how the implementation of Government Regulation No. 46 Year 2013
Financial Report Corporate Taxpayers, especially UMKM in Mataram. This research is a case study.
Informants consisted of tax authorities, Tax Consultants and the taxpayer. Data analysis was carried
out with reference to the cross-case analysis. The method used is a qualitative method.
The conclusion of this study show that the presence of PP 46 of 2013 Financial Statements taxpayer makes
a real case. This is because the size of the net income of a person or business entity will not affect the
amount of tax to be paid, because the tax rate is calculated by multiplying directly against gross income, so
that the taxpayer does not have the opportunity to manipulate their tax payable. This will happen if the
counterparty of the taxpayer to report transaction activity that occurred or a company that had a turnover
taxpayer NPWP thus automatically tracked or known exactly amount. But if the counterparty of the
taxpayer is a small company that does not have a NPWP or have a NPWP, but do not obey the reporting
of the transaction, it makes the taxpayer makes financial statements that do not correspond to the reality.
That is to decrease the amount of profit, they set the gross turnover / turnover, cost of goods sold and
expenses incurred in the Profit / Loss them, so it will automatically shrink the number of tax payments.
The suggestion from this study is that the set of rules or policies that make government may have data on
the amount of circulation of business taxpayers can use to minimize the chances of non compliance
Taxpayers do with manipulating the Financial Statements. The suggestion from this study is that the set of
rules or policies that make government may have data on the amount of circulation of business
taxpayers and counterparties that can be used to
minimize non-compliance is opportunity for the taxpayer to manipulate the financial statements.


Keywords


Government Regulation No. 46 In 2013, opponents of the Transaction; taxpayer; Financial Reports;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anwar Saifhul, 2014. “Dimensi Keadilan atas

Pemberlakuan PP No. 46 Tahun 2013 dan

Peningkatan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak”

Corry Astri (2007). “Pengaruh Penerapan PP. No 46

Tahun 2013 terhadap Tingkat Pertumbuhan

Wajib Pajak UMKM dan Penerimaan PPh

Pasal 4 Ayat 2”

Denzin, K.Norman dan Yvonmas S Lincoln, 2009.

Handbook Of Qualitative Research, Pustaka

Pelajar Yogyakarta

Departemen Keuangan (2013). “Buku Panduan Hak

dan Kewajiban Wajib Pajak”

Hari Yanto (2014). “Inkonsistensi Hukum

Pemberian Fasilitas Keringanan Pajak Bagi

Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah melalui

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun

Herryanto Marisa dan Agus Arianto Toli (2013).

“Pengaruh Kegiatan Sosialisasi dan

Pemeriksaan Pajak terhadap Jumlah

Penerimaan Pajak” http://pajak.go.id/statistic

Jacklyn Eunike. (2014). “Pemahaman Wajib Pajak

terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah No. 46 tahun

tentang Pajak UMKM”

Judisseno, Rimsky.(2005). Pajak dan Strategi

Bisnis. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Jurnal Parlemen. “Dirjen Pajak; Sulit Tarik Pajak

dari UKM,” 21 November 2013, dapat

diakses pada

http//www.jurnalparlemen.com/view/6923/di

rjen-pajak-sulit-tarik-pajak-dari-ukm.html.

Kharisma Raditha (2013). “Pengaruh Pelaksanaan

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia

Nomor 46 Tahun 2013 tentang Pajak

Peghasilan Terhadap Kelangsungan Usaha

Mikro Kecil dan Menengah, Fakultas

Hukum Universitas Jember”.

Kurniawan Rizki. (2014). “Analisis Kepatuhan

Wajib Pajak Usaha Kecil Menengah pada

Rumah Makan Palupi

Mardiasmo (1995).”Perpajakan Edisi 7.

Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Murfianto Roy. (2013). “Pro dan Kontra Peraturan

Pemerintah Nomor 46 tahun 2013”

Moleong, J. Lexy. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian

Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Penerbit PT. Remaja

Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Nashrudin Ahsan Bashori. (2014). Pada SNA 17

Mataram Lombok Universitas Mataram

“Pengaruh Persepsi atas PP No. 46 Tahun

Terhadap Kepatuhan Sukarela Wajib

Pajak yang memiliki Peredaran Bruto

tertentu pada KPP Surabaya Rungkut”

Nasucha. (2004). “Reformasi Administrasi

Perpajakan di Indonesia dan Menelaah

Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib

Pajak karena Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak

dimungkinkan”

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 46

Tahun 2013

PP. NO.46 Tahun 2013.Direktorat Jendaral

pajak.Tentang pph atas penghasilan dari

usaha wajib pajak yang memiliki peredaran

bruto tertentu

Rochmat Soemitro. (2004). Asas dan Dasar-dasar

Perpajakan 2. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama

R. Mansury. (2013). Dengan judul “Dampak

Pemberlakuan PP. 46 Tahun 2013 terhadap

Penerimaan PPh dan Tanggapan Wajib Pajak

di KPP Pratama Sukoharjo Tahun 2013.

Sarosa, Samiaji.2012. Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar-

Dasar, Indeks. Jakarta.

Support.online-pajak.com

Sugiyono, (2009). Metode Penelitian Bisnis

(Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan

R&D).Bandung: Alfabeta.

Undang Undang Ketentuan Umum Perpajakan

Pasal 1 ayat 1.

Waluyo, (2011). Perpajakan Indonesia 1. Jakarta :

Salemba Empat




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v12i2.2765

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 InFestasi

Creative Commons License

Faculty of Economics, University of Trunojoyo Madura
© 2016