IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NO 46 TAHUN 2013 PADA LAPORAN KEUANGAN WAJIB PAJAK BADAN DI MATARAM
Abstract
This study aims to explain how the implementation of Government Regulation No. 46 Year 2013
Financial Report Corporate Taxpayers, especially UMKM in Mataram. This research is a case study.
Informants consisted of tax authorities, Tax Consultants and the taxpayer. Data analysis was carried
out with reference to the cross-case analysis. The method used is a qualitative method.
The conclusion of this study show that the presence of PP 46 of 2013 Financial Statements taxpayer makes
a real case. This is because the size of the net income of a person or business entity will not affect the
amount of tax to be paid, because the tax rate is calculated by multiplying directly against gross income, so
that the taxpayer does not have the opportunity to manipulate their tax payable. This will happen if the
counterparty of the taxpayer to report transaction activity that occurred or a company that had a turnover
taxpayer NPWP thus automatically tracked or known exactly amount. But if the counterparty of the
taxpayer is a small company that does not have a NPWP or have a NPWP, but do not obey the reporting
of the transaction, it makes the taxpayer makes financial statements that do not correspond to the reality.
That is to decrease the amount of profit, they set the gross turnover / turnover, cost of goods sold and
expenses incurred in the Profit / Loss them, so it will automatically shrink the number of tax payments.
The suggestion from this study is that the set of rules or policies that make government may have data on
the amount of circulation of business taxpayers can use to minimize the chances of non compliance
Taxpayers do with manipulating the Financial Statements. The suggestion from this study is that the set of
rules or policies that make government may have data on the amount of circulation of business
taxpayers and counterparties that can be used to
minimize non-compliance is opportunity for the taxpayer to manipulate the financial statements.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anwar Saifhul, 2014. “Dimensi Keadilan atas
Pemberlakuan PP No. 46 Tahun 2013 dan
Peningkatan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak”
Corry Astri (2007). “Pengaruh Penerapan PP. No 46
Tahun 2013 terhadap Tingkat Pertumbuhan
Wajib Pajak UMKM dan Penerimaan PPh
Pasal 4 Ayat 2”
Denzin, K.Norman dan Yvonmas S Lincoln, 2009.
Handbook Of Qualitative Research, Pustaka
Pelajar Yogyakarta
Departemen Keuangan (2013). “Buku Panduan Hak
dan Kewajiban Wajib Pajak”
Hari Yanto (2014). “Inkonsistensi Hukum
Pemberian Fasilitas Keringanan Pajak Bagi
Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah melalui
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun
”
Herryanto Marisa dan Agus Arianto Toli (2013).
“Pengaruh Kegiatan Sosialisasi dan
Pemeriksaan Pajak terhadap Jumlah
Penerimaan Pajak” http://pajak.go.id/statistic
Jacklyn Eunike. (2014). “Pemahaman Wajib Pajak
terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah No. 46 tahun
tentang Pajak UMKM”
Judisseno, Rimsky.(2005). Pajak dan Strategi
Bisnis. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Jurnal Parlemen. “Dirjen Pajak; Sulit Tarik Pajak
dari UKM,” 21 November 2013, dapat
diakses pada
http//www.jurnalparlemen.com/view/6923/di
rjen-pajak-sulit-tarik-pajak-dari-ukm.html.
Kharisma Raditha (2013). “Pengaruh Pelaksanaan
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia
Nomor 46 Tahun 2013 tentang Pajak
Peghasilan Terhadap Kelangsungan Usaha
Mikro Kecil dan Menengah, Fakultas
Hukum Universitas Jember”.
Kurniawan Rizki. (2014). “Analisis Kepatuhan
Wajib Pajak Usaha Kecil Menengah pada
Rumah Makan Palupi
Mardiasmo (1995).”Perpajakan Edisi 7.
Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Murfianto Roy. (2013). “Pro dan Kontra Peraturan
Pemerintah Nomor 46 tahun 2013”
Moleong, J. Lexy. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian
Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Penerbit PT. Remaja
Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Nashrudin Ahsan Bashori. (2014). Pada SNA 17
Mataram Lombok Universitas Mataram
“Pengaruh Persepsi atas PP No. 46 Tahun
Terhadap Kepatuhan Sukarela Wajib
Pajak yang memiliki Peredaran Bruto
tertentu pada KPP Surabaya Rungkut”
Nasucha. (2004). “Reformasi Administrasi
Perpajakan di Indonesia dan Menelaah
Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib
Pajak karena Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak
dimungkinkan”
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 46
Tahun 2013
PP. NO.46 Tahun 2013.Direktorat Jendaral
pajak.Tentang pph atas penghasilan dari
usaha wajib pajak yang memiliki peredaran
bruto tertentu
Rochmat Soemitro. (2004). Asas dan Dasar-dasar
Perpajakan 2. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama
R. Mansury. (2013). Dengan judul “Dampak
Pemberlakuan PP. 46 Tahun 2013 terhadap
Penerimaan PPh dan Tanggapan Wajib Pajak
di KPP Pratama Sukoharjo Tahun 2013.
Sarosa, Samiaji.2012. Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar-
Dasar, Indeks. Jakarta.
Support.online-pajak.com
Sugiyono, (2009). Metode Penelitian Bisnis
(Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan
R&D).Bandung: Alfabeta.
Undang Undang Ketentuan Umum Perpajakan
Pasal 1 ayat 1.
Waluyo, (2011). Perpajakan Indonesia 1. Jakarta :
Salemba Empat
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v12i2.2765
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Henny - Henny
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.