Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Dinar: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam is a journal that publishes scientific papers on the results of the study or research and review of the literature in the scope and focus of Islamic Economics. The editor accepts the article has not been published in other media with the writing format as listed on page manuscript writing guidelines. This journal was established in 2015, published two times a year, in January and August.

The purpose of this journal is for the publication of scientific articles
covering studies within the scope of Islamic Economics, such as:

  1. Philosophy of Islamic Economics
  2. Islamic Economic Thought
  3. Islamic Economics and Contemporary Issues
  4. Contemporary Issues in Islamic Financial Institution
  5. Sharia Management
  6. Sharia Accounting
  7. Legal Aspects in Islamic Economics 
  8. Entrepreneurship
  9. Halal Industry (food, tourism, product, etc.)
  10. Islamic philanthropy (zakat, waqf, sadaqah, and infaq)
  11. Entrepreneurship
  12. Halal Industry (food, tourism, product, etc.)
  13. Halal supply chain management.
  14. Islamic and Muslim lifestyle

 

Section Policies

Artikel

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

DESCRIPTION

Submissions should be prepared following the Author Guidelines. The manuscript may be returned to authors without a scientific assessment if they do not meet all submission requirements, are not in the correct format, or cannot be downloaded reliably.

Submissions must represent the original and independent work of the authors. The principal Editor assesses each new submission to determine whether it falls within the general remit of Dinar: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam. We will reject a manuscript without review if it contains insufficient content; it exceeds our word limit, or is incorrectly formatted; it is poorly presented and unclear. Principal Editor or Associate Editor will handle manuscripts that pass the initial assessment to oversee the review process for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation.

Once a manuscript passes the initial checks, it will be assigned to at least two independent experts for peer review. A Double-blind review is applied, where authors' identities are known to reviewers. Peer review comments are confidential and will only be disclosed with the express agreement of the reviewer. All manuscripts are subject to peer review, and authors can expect a decision, or an explanation for the delay, within 2 months of receipt. The corresponding author should submit the revised manuscript within 2 weeks if a revision is invited. Principal Editors decide based on the information gained through the peer-review process.

As explained in publication ethics, we ensure that the reviewed manuscript is treated confidentially before being published.

 

TYPES OF DECISION

There are four types of editorial decisions during the peer review process, which are:

DECLINE SUBMISSION

Following peer review, the paper is judged not acceptable for publication in Dinar: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam and resubmission is not possible.

RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW

The submitted version of the paper is not acceptable and requires major revision. Still, work has clear potential, and Dinar: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam is prepared to consider a new version. Authors are offered the opportunity to resubmit their paper as a new submission. Concerns will remain regarding the paper's suitability for publication until the authors convince the editors that their paper fits the scope and standards of Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business. The resubmitted manuscript will be returned to the original associate editor if possible.

REVISION

The paper requires changes before a final decision can be made. Authors are asked to modify their manuscript in light of comments received from referees and editors and submit a new version for consideration within 2 weeks of receiving the decision letter. A point-by-point explanation of how comments have been addressed must be supplied with the revised version of the paper. Revisions may undergo further peer review, and papers may undergo more than one round of revision. If the authors do not revise their papers to the editors' satisfaction, the paper can still be declined from publication in Dinar: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam.

ACCEPT SUBMISSION

The paper is accepted for publication, subject to conditions that need to be addressed in producing a final version of the manuscript. These may include sub-editing changes and minor amendments to ensure the paper fully matches our criteria. After final checking in the editorial office, acceptance is confirmed, and the paper is forwarded to the publishers for publication.

GALLEY PROOF

Page proofs will be sent to the corresponding author for final checking. Corrections to the proofs must be restricted to printer's errors: any other changes to the text, in equations or grammar, may be charged to the author. Proofs should be returned to the editors within three days of receipt to minimize the risk of the author's contribution being held over to a later issue. The editors do not accept responsibility for the correctness of published content. The author's responsibility is to check the content at the proof stage.

 

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global knowledge exchange.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institutions. Users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full-text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is following Budapest Open Access Initiative

Hasil gambar untuk Budapest Open Access Initiative  

Budapest Open Access Initiative

An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an unprecedented public good. The old tradition is the willingness of scientists and scholars to publish the fruits of their research in scholarly journals without payment for the sake of inquiry and knowledge. The new technology is the internet. The public good they make possible is the worldwide electronic distribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and other curious minds. Removing access barriers to this literature will accelerate research, enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor and the poor with the rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the foundation for uniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for knowledge.

For various reasons, this free and unrestricted online availability, which we will call open access, has been limited to small portions of the journal literature. But even in these limited collections, many different initiatives have shown that open access is economically feasible. It gives readers extraordinary power to find and make use of relevant literature, and it gives authors and their works vast and measurable new visibilityreadership, and impact. To secure these benefits for all, we call on all interested institutions and individuals to help open up access to the rest of this literature and remove the barriers, especially the price barriers, that stand in the way. The more who join the effort to advance this cause, the sooner we will enjoy the benefits of open access.

The literature that should be freely accessible online is what scholars give to the world without the expectation of payment. Primarily, this category encompasses their peer-reviewed journal articles. Still, it also includes any unreviewed preprints that they might wish to put online for comment or to alert colleagues to important research findings. There are many degrees and kinds of wider and easier access to this literature. By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.

While the peer-reviewed journal literature should be accessible online without cost to readers, it is not costless to produce. However, experiments show that the overall costs of providing open access to this literature are far lower than traditional forms of dissemination. With such an opportunity to save money and expand the scope of dissemination simultaneously, there is today a strong incentive for professional associations, universities, libraries, foundations, and others to embrace open access as a means of advancing their missions. Achieving open access will require new cost recovery models and financing mechanisms. Still, the significantly lower cost of dissemination is a reason to be confident that the goal is attainable and not merely preferable or utopian.

We recommend two complementary strategies to achieve open access to scholarly journal literature. 

I.  Self-Archiving: First, scholars need the tools and assistance to deposit their refereed journal articles in open electronic archives, a practice commonly called self-archiving. When these archives conform to standards created by the Open Archives Initiative, then search engines and other tools can treat the separate archives as one. Users then need not know which archives exist or where they are located to find and use their contents.

II. Open-access Journals: Second, scholars need the means to launch a new generation of journals committed to open access and help existing journals that elect to make the transition to open access. Because journal articles should be disseminated as widely as possible, these new journals will no longer invoke copyright to restrict access to and use the material they publish. Instead, they will use copyright and other tools to ensure permanent open access to all published articles. Because the price is a barrier to access, these new journals will not charge subscription or access fees and turn to other methods to cover their expenses. There are many alternative sources of funds for this purpose, including the foundations and governments that fund research, the universities and laboratories that employ researchers, endowments set up by discipline or institution, friends of the cause of open access, profits from the sale of add-ons to the basic texts, funds freed up by the demise or cancellation of journals charging traditional subscription or access fees, or even contributions from the researchers themselves. There is no need to favour one of these solutions over the others for all disciplines or nations, and no need to stop looking for other, creative alternatives.


Open access to peer-reviewed journal literature is the goal. Self-archiving (I.) and a new generation of open-access journals (II.) are the ways to attain this goal. They are not only direct and effective means to this end. They are within reach of scholars themselves immediately and need not wait on changes brought about by markets or legislation. While we endorse the two outlined strategies, we also encourage experimentation with further ways to transition from the present methods of dissemination to open access. Flexibility, experimentation, and adaptation to local circumstances are the best ways to assure that progress in diverse settings will be rapid, secure, and long-lived.

The Open Society Institute, the foundation network founded by philanthropist George Soros, is committed to providing initial help and funding to realize this goal. It will use its resources and influence to extend and promote institutional self-archiving, launch new open-access journals, and help an open-access journal system become economically self-sufficient. While the Open Society Institute's commitment and resources are substantial, this initiative is very much in need of other organizations to lend their effort and resources.

We invite governments, universities, libraries, journal editors, publishers, foundations, learned societies, professional associations, and individual scholars who share our vision to join us in the task of removing the barriers to open access and building a future in which research and education in every part of the world are that much freer to flourish.

February 14, 2002
Budapest, Hungary

Leslie Chan: Bioline International
Darius Cuplinskas
: Director, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Michael Eisen
: Public Library of Science
Fred Friend
: Director Scholarly Communication, University College London
Yana Genova
: Next Page Foundation
Jean-Claude Guédon: University of Montreal
Melissa Hagemann
: Program Officer, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Stevan Harnad: Professor of Cognitive Science, University of Southampton, Universite du Quebec a Montreal
Rick Johnson
: Director, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC)
Rima Kupryte: Open Society Institute
Manfredi La Manna
: Electronic Society for Social Scientists 
István Rév: Open Society Institute, Open Society Archives
Monika Segbert: eIFL Project consultant 
Sidnei de Souza
: Informatics Director at CRIA, Bioline International
Peter Suber
: Professor of Philosophy, Earlham College & The Free Online Scholarship Newsletter
Jan Velterop
: Publisher, BioMed Central

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...