gajahslot mariatogel airbet robopragma wajik77 mposlot https://siapadia.riau.go.id/plugins/pulsa-limaribu/ https://journal.parahikma.ac.id/juaraslot/ https://jurnalbening.uho.ac.id/pages/tm/ http://adj.fkg.unand.ac.id/lib/pkp/alexistoto/ http://inomet.ft.unand.ac.id/locale/bento/ https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/lib/pkp/sbobet88/ https://htn.parahikma.ac.id/sbotop/ https://jurnalbening.uho.ac.id/lib/pkp/bni4d/ https://job.uho.ac.id/lib/pkp/btn4d/ paito hk PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK PENGELOLAAN DAN PEMANFAATAN ATAS TANAH OLEH MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT YANG BERADA DALAM KAWASAN TAMAN NASIONAL KELIMUTU | Murni | Rechtidee

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK PENGELOLAAN DAN PEMANFAATAN ATAS TANAH OLEH MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT YANG BERADA DALAM KAWASAN TAMAN NASIONAL KELIMUTU

Christiana Sri Murni, Yohanes Pande, Bernadus B. Kelen

Abstract


The establishment of the zoning of the Kelimutu National Park by the relevant agencies resulted in the management of the forest area being closed to the access of the Customary Law community as the owner of agricultural/plantation land in Niowula Village, Detusoko District, Ende Regency and this is detrimental to the community. In this regard, this study aims to examine how customary forests are regulated in the versions of regulations before and after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012. This research is a normative research using a statutory approach. The existing primary and secondary legal materials were then subjected to a qualitative juridical analysis. The results of the study show that the constitution requires conflict resolution to be carried out using a functional approach and a human rights approach, but in fact the use of a human rights approach creates a conflict between the rules under the constitution and the constitution. This requires the government to harmonize regulations because there are still many regulations which are very dominant with a functional approach, and very little use of a human rights approach.


Keywords


Protection; Customary Forest; Rights of Customary Law Communities.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku :

Mulyadi, Lilik, 2017, Eksistensi, Dinamika dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Atas Tanah Ulayat Masyarakat Adat di Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni

Soemadiningrat, Otje Salman, 2002, Rekonseptualisasi Hukum Adat Kontemporer, Bandung : PT. Alumni

Suharso dan Anna Retnoningsih, 2014, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Semarang: Widya Karya.

Jurnal :

Herman, Hendra, 2021, Pengakuan terhadap Masyarakat Hukum Adat Marga Sarampas dan Penguasaan Hak Atas Tanahnya, Wajah Hukum, 5 (1) : 56-60, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v5i1.340

Herryani. Dessy Ghea dkk, 2019. Eksistensi Hak Komunal Masyarakat Hukum Adat dalam Kebijakan Penataan Aset Reforma Agraria, Kerta Patrika, 41 (3): 283-299, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/KP.2019.v41.i03.p0 7

Kuswandi. Relawan dkk, 2015, Model Pengelolaan Hasil Hutan Kayu oleh Masyarakat Adat : Studi Kasus Pemilik Hak Ulayat di Kabupaten Teluk Bintuni. Jurnal Kehutanan Papuasia, Unipa, 1 (1) :11-17, https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/291669-model-pengelolaan-hasil-hutan-kayu-oleh-25277a8f.p

Pratiwi, Rushestiana, Tb Unu Nitibaskara dan Messalina L Salampessy, 2019, Kelembagaan Masyarakat Dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Adat (Studi Kasus Di Kasepuhan Pasir Eurih, Desa Sindanglaya, Kecamatan Sobang, Kabupaten Lebak, Provinsi Banten), Jurnal Belantara, 2 (1) : 62-69, DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jbl.v2i1.131

Pravita, Ni Luh Made Salya Nirmala dan AA Gede Oka Parwata, 2021, Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35 Tahun 2012 Terhadap Hutan Adat dan Eksistensi Masyarakat Adat, Jurnal Kertha Wicara,10 (4) : 235-246, DOI : https://doi.org/KW.2021.v10.i04.p05

Samosir, Djamanat. 2013. Legalisasi Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Undip, 42 (2), diunduh dari https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/viewFile/5812/9916.

Sulastriyono dan Sartika Intaning Pradhani, 2018, Pemikiran Hukum Adat Djojodigoeno dan Relevansinya Kini, Mimbar Hukum, 30 (3) : 449-464, https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.36956

Suparto, 2021, Kedudukan dan Proses Penetapan Hutan Adat Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 Serta Implementasinya Di Provinsi Riau, Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 5 (2):198-214, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24970/bhl.v5i2.171

Sylviani dan Ismatul Hakim, 2014, Analisis Tenurial dalam Pengembangan Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH) : Studi Kasus KPH Gedong Wani Provinsi Lampung, Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi, 11 (4) : 309-322, DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jsek.2014.11.4.309-322

Takaria, R. Yando, 2014, Konstitusionalitas Kriteria Masyarakat (Hukum) Adat Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012, Kajian, 19 (2) : 127-144, DOI: https://doi.org/10.22212/kajian.v19i2.552

Tobroni, Faiq, 2013, Menguatkan Hak Masyarakat Adat Atas Hutan Adat (Studi Putusan MK Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012, Jurnal Konstitusi, 10 (3) : 461-482, https://www.mkri.id/public/content/infoumum/ejurnal/pdf

Wartiningsih dan Nunuk Nuswardani, 2021, Policy Model Reconstruction of Socia Forestry. Sriwijaya Law Review, 5 (1) :130-142, DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss1.451.pp130-142

Yulyandini, Mega Dwi, 2018, Wewenang Tidak Langsung Negara Terhadap Hutan Adat Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012, Jurist Diction, 1 (1): 242-261, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jd.v1i1.9744




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v18i1.6130

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
Rechtidee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Indexing and Abstracting: