CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW DI INDONESIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 48/PUU-IX/2011: DARI NEGATIVE LEGISLATOR MENJADI POSITIVE LEGISLATOR

Xavier Nugraha, Risdiana Izzaty, Alya Anira

Abstract


The Constitutional Court carrying out its duties regarding the constitutional review acts as a negative legislator which canceling laws that are contrary to the 1945 Constitution. This study examines the political shift of constitutional review law where the Constitutional Court only acts as a negative legislator, but nowadays Constitutional Court acts as a positive legislator. The research method used is normative research. The results of this study conclude that the Constitutional Court Ruling reflects the role of a positive legislator is a progressive and responsive decision to avoid legal chaos due to legal vacuum in society. However, it does not mean that the decision of the Constitutional Court can always be a positive legislator. Only in circumstances based on 3 (three) indicators, namely: a) Justice and benefit of the community; b) An urgent situation; c) Filling out legal vacancies (rechtvacuum) to avoid chaos or legal chaos in the community, then the Constitutional Court Decision can be a positive legislator so that there is still a balance in the check and balances system.

 

Keywords: Constitutional Review, Positive Legislator, Negative Legislator


Keywords


Constitutional Review, Positive Legislator, Negative Legislator

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Achmad, Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto. 2010, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Amirudin dan Zainal Asikin. 2010, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2010, Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Budiardjo, Miriam. 2005, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Cappelleti, Mauro. 1989, The Judicial Process in Comperative Perspective. Oxford: Calrendon Pess.

Faiz, Pan Mohammad. 2016, Relevansi Doktrin Negative Legislator, Majalah Konstitusi No. 108. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Kelsen, Hans. 1949, General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge: Harvard Unity Pess.

MD, Mahfud. 2009, Konstitusi dan Hukum Dalam Kontroversi Isu. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Martitah. 2013, Mahkamah Konstitusi dari Negative Legislature ke Positive Legislature?. Jakarta: Penerbit Konstitusi Press (Konpress).

Republik Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi. 2010, Mengawal Demokrasi Menegakkan Keadilan Substantif. Jakarta: Sekjen dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Yaqin, Arief Ainul. 2016, Constitutional Question: Kewenangan yang Terlupakan dan Gagasan untuk Melembagakannya di Makhamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Journal Article

Ahmadi. 2014, Konstitusional Review: Suatu Perbandingan Praktek Ketatanegaraan, Al-Izzah 9 (1)

Esfandiari, Fitria dkk. 2012, Positive Legislature Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum 1 (2)

Hoecke, M.V. 2011, Legal doctrine: Which method(s) for what kind of discipline?, HART Publishing, Oxford.

Manik, Rahmat GM. 2016, Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Atas Kesalahan Berat Setelah Pasal 158 Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan Dicabut Oleh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 012/PUU-I/2003. Melayunesia Law 1 (1)

Martitah. 2012, Progresivitas Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Membuat Putusan (Analisis Terhadap Keberadaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Positive Legislature), Masalah-Masalah Hukum 41 (2)

Qamar, Nurul. 2012, Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi 1 (1)

Rahman, Faiz dan Dian Agung Wicaksono. 2016, Eksistensi dan Karakteristik Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Konstitusi, 13 (2)

Yulistyowati, Efi dkk. 2016, Penerapan Konsep Trias Politica Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia: Studi Komparatif atas Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945 Sebelum dan Sesudah Amandemen. Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya 18 (2)

Skripsi, Thesis, Disertasi

Budiyanto, Agung. 2016, Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Positive Legislature (Studi Putusan Nomor 28/PUU-XI/2013 dan Putusan Nomor 85/PUU-XI/2013). Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Maasawet, Sukma. 2016, Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Policy Maker Menggantikan Pembentuk Undang-Undang. Thesis, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Website

Faiz, Pan Mohamad. 2017, Judicial Restraint vs Judicial Activism, Kolom Opini Majalah Konstitusi, No. 130.[Diakses 9 April 2019] https://panmohamadfaiz.com/2017/12/31/judicial-restraint-vs-judicial-activism/

Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Buku VI Kekuasaan Kehakiman.[Diakses 9 April 2019] https://mkri.id/index.php?page=download.NaskahKomprehensif&id=8




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v15i1.5183

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
Rechtidee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Indexing and Abstracting: