Comparison of The Right to Be Forgotten Regulations in Indonesia and European Union Countries
Abstract
The development of digital technology has raised crucial issues related to personal data protection, one of which is related to the right to be forgotten. The European Union has strictly regulated this right through the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) since 2018, replacing the previous provisions in Directive 95/46/EC. The GDPR itself regulates the "Right to be Erased" or "Right to be Forgotten," which includes how to Request Erasure, Conditions for Erasure, Obligations of Data Controllers, and Exceptions regarding what matters do not apply to the Right to Erasure. In contrast, Indonesia has only just begun to accommodate this principle through changes to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) of 2016 and the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP) of 2022, although it still faces various implementation challenges. This study aims to compare the legal regulations related to the right to be forgotten between Indonesia and the European Union in order to assess the effectiveness of the available legal protection, as well as encourage the preparation of more adaptive regulations in Indonesia. This study uses a normative legal approach, with a statute approach method that focuses on the study of laws and regulations. The results of the study show that the European Union has a more comprehensive and structured protection system through the GDPR, while Indonesia is still in the early stages of development with limitations in institutional and technical aspects, so it is necessary to strengthen the implementation and consider the application of a similar approach as in the European Union to guarantee the right to personal data effectively.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Book
Bachtiar. Legal Research Methods. Banten: Unpam Press, 2019.
Beynon-Davies, P. Information Systems: An Introduction to Informatics in Organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
Case C-131/12, Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja. González (May 13, 2014), Paragraph 14.
Danimunthe, Fadli Zalini and Heru Susetyo. The Right to Be Forgotten. Jakarta: Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, 2019.
Hadikusuma, Hilman. Indonesian Legal Language. Bandung: Alumni, 2010.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Legal Research. Kencana Prenada. Media Group. Jakarta, 2011.
Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. “The Right to Privacy.” Law and Development 4, 2018.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Legal Science. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
Journal Articles
Anggraeni, Fitri Setyawati. “Polemic of Personal Data Ownership Regulation, Urgency for Harmonization and Legal Reform in Indonesia”, Journal of Law & Development. 48. 4(2018): 814-825, 2018.
Court of Justice of the European Union. “Finds Individuals Have a 'Right to Be Forgotten' Under Data Protection Law.” In Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis, “The Right to Privacy,” Law and Development 4, 2018.
Mantelero, Alessandro. “The EU Proposal for a General Data Protection Regulation and the Roots of the 'Right to be Forgotten'.” Computer Law & Security Review 29, no. 3 (2013): 229–235.
Firdaus, Sunny Ummul, et al. “The Role of Dissenting Opinions of Constitutional Judges in National Law Reform.” De Jure Legal Research Journal 20, no. 3 (2020).
Indrayati, Rosita. “Revitalization of the Role of Judges as Executors of Judicial Power in the Indonesian Constitutional System.” Kertha Patrika 38, no. 2 (2016).
Rahardjo, B. (2022). Comparative Legal Analysis of the Right to Be Forgotten under the Indonesian PDP Law and the EU GDPR. Jurnal Media Hukum, 29(2), 245–262.
Zahra, F. M., & Fauzan, R. (2021). The Dilemma of Freedom of Expression and the Right to Be Forgotten in Indonesian Cyber Law. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(3), 387–402.
Schwartz, P. M., & Peifer, K. N. (2017). Transatlantic Data Privacy Law. Georgetown Law Journal, 106, 115–178.
Halim, A. (2020). Right to be Forgotten: Between Normative Jurisdiction and Legal Reality in Indonesian Cyber Law. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(4), 785–802.
de Hert, P., & Papakonstantinou, V. (2012). The proposed Data Protection Regulation replacing Directive 95/46/EC: A sound system for the protection of individuals. Computer Law & Security Review, 28(2), 130–142.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v20i1.30287
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Rechtidee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexing and Abstracting: