The Influence Of Differences In Judges' Opinions On Legal Certainty In Deciding A Case
Abstract
This study examines the influence of differences of opinion among judges on legal certainty in court decisions. In judicial practice, differences of opinion between judges often arise and have the potential to affect consistency and legal certainty, which are one of the main pillars of the legal system. The research method used is qualitative with a juridical-normative approach, utilizing analysis of relevant laws and legal literature. The results of the study indicate that differences of opinion among judges can cause legal uncertainty if not managed properly, thus impacting the credibility of the judicial institution and public trust in the judge's decision. Therefore, it is important to develop clear mechanisms and standards for handling differences of opinion among judges to maintain legal certainty in the judicial system.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Book
Dimyati, Khudzaifah.(2015) Legal Theorization: A Study of the Development of Legal Thought in Indonesia 1945–1990. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press
Manan, Bagir and Kuntanan Magnar, (2017), Some Problems of Constitutional Law. Bandung: PT Alumni
Subekti, (2015) Law of Evidence Jakarta: Balai Pustaka
Journal Articles
Anam, Ach. Dlofirul.(2019), Axiological Foundations of Judges' Freedom in Deciding Substantive Justice Review Cases. An-Nawazil 1 (2)
Aryanto, Jesi. (2019), “Supervision of Supreme Court Justices and Constitutional Justices by the Judicial Commission.” ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 3 (2)
Berliana, Melisa, Yennie K. Milono, Hj. Lilik Prihatini,(2023), PERBEDAAN PENDAPAT HAKIM (DISSENTING OPINION) TERHADAP PUTUSAN LEPAS DARI SEGALA TUNTUTAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI BANTUAN LIKUIDITAS BANK INDONESIA, PALAR (Pakuan Law Review) ,09 (1)
Fartini, Ade. (2018),“Law and State Functions According to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.” Al-Ahkam 14 (1).
Firdaus, Sunny Ummul, et al.,(2020),“The Role of Dissenting Opinions of Constitutional Judges in National Law Reform.” De Jure Legal Research Journal 20 (3)
Indrayati, Rosita.(2016), “Revitalization of the Role of Judges as Executors of Judicial Power in the Indonesian Constitutional System.” Kertha Patrika 38 (2)
LF Simanjuntak, E Rusmiati, BA Atmaja,(2023), Dissenting Opinion by Judges in The Process of Making Decisions on Corruption Cases as a Form of Judge Freedom, Jurnal Mercatoria, 16 (1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v16i1.8915
McIntyre, Joe.(2016), “In Defense of Judicial Dissent.” Adelaide Law Review 37
NG, Marshal, (2018). "Dissenting Opinion in Indonesian Law." Varia Hukum, Edition No. 30 (39)
Surya, Ni Luh Kadek Rai, and Dewi I Dewa Made Suartha (2016),“Positive Values of Legal Consequences of Dissenting Opinion in Criminal Justice in Indonesia.” Kertha Wicara: Journal of Legal Science 5 (3): 1–5.
Weruin, U. U. ,(2024). Dissenting Opinion Para Hakim dalam Pengadilan: Fungsi dan Ancamannya. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(10), 12359-12367. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i10.6183
Yuliana, Tora .Masayu Robianti, Triyuda Kharnady, (2024), Analisis Dampak Adanya Dissenting Opinion Hakim Terhadap Perkara Perdata, Viva Themis: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, 7 (2), doi: 10.24967/vt.v6i1.2070
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v20i1.30285
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Rechtidee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexing and Abstracting:
