Alternatif Model Kebijakan dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Kemiskinan di Indonesia

Achmad Habibullah

Abstract


Meskipun subsistensi dari komitmen untuk pengentasan kemiskinan melalui sebagai salah satu contoh dari MDGs PBB dan kebijakan pemerintah Indonesia, dikonfirmasi hasil yang memuaskan. Kegagalan dalam upaya pengentasan kemiskinan ini kemudian diamati dari perspektif studi administrasi publik, khususnya sebagai efektivitas isu-isu kebijakan, termasuk desain, pendekatan manajemen, dan nilai-nilai. Sangat menarik untuk mempelajari bagaimana orang-orang miskin sebagai agen dikelilingi struktur pertemuan mereka dalam bentuk hubungan dengan nilai-nilai kepentingan aktor-aktor lain sebagai implikasi dari model kebijakan yang ada. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model kebijakan yang ada dengan menggunakan pendekatan struktural adalah konten baik terlalu banyak yang terlalu banyak kebijakan didasarkan pada pendekatan supply-driven dan implikasi praktis pelaksanaannya. Pelaksanaan kebijakan yang dihasilkan struktur batas bagi masyarakat miskin. Dalam situasi ini, Strategis miskin kelangsungan hidup khusus mereka sendiri.

Keywords


pengurangan kemiskinan; model kebijakan; agen vs struktur

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Wahab. (2002) Kebijakan Desentralisasi untuk Menjangkau Kaum Miskin dalam Solichin Abdul Wahab et al. (Eds.) Masa Depan Otonomi Daerah: Kajian Sosial, Ekonomi, dan Politik untuk Menciptakan Sinergi dalam Pembangunan Daerah. SIC. Surabaya.

Arce, Alberto. (1995) Beyond State Intervention: Post- Modernism and Development dalam Frerks, George E. & Jan H.B. den Ouden (Eds.) In

Search of the Middle Ground: Essays on the Sociology of Planned Development. Wageningen Agricultural University. Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Brett, E. A. (1996) The Participatory Principle in Development Projects: the Cost and Benefits of Cooperation. Public Administration and Development. 16: 5–19.

Carvalho, Soniya. (2003) 2002 Annual Review of Development Effectiveness, Achieving Development Outcomes: The Millenium Challenge. The World Bank. Washington DC.

Chambers, Robert. (1988) Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Longman Scientific and Technical. 1988 Printing. New York.

. (1995) Paradigm Shift and the Practice of Participatory Research and Development in Nelson, Nici & Susan Wright. Power and Participatory Development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

Cochran, Charles L. & Eloise F. Malone. (1995) Public Policy: Perspective and Choices. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Giddens, Anthony. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press. Cambridge, UK.

Goulet, Denis, dan Charles K. Wilber. (1992) The Human Dilemma of Development in Wilber, Charles K & Kenneth P. Jameson (Eds.), The Political Economy of Development and Under- Development. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

Green, Gary Paul & Anna Haines. (2002) Asset Building and Community Development. SAGE Publications. Thousand Oaks. London. New Delhi.

Henderson. (1999) AThird Sector Initiative: NGOs and Grassroots Initiatives in Keith M. Henderson

& O.P. Dwivedi (Eds.) Bureaucracy and the Alternatives in World Perspective. Macmillan Press Ltd. & ST. Martin’s Press, Inc.

Hettne, Bjorn. (1990) Development Theory and The Three Worlds. Longman Scientific & Technical. New York.

& Jan Kooiman (Eds.) Managing Public Organizations: Lessons from Contemporary European Experience. SAGE Publications. Thousand Oaks. London. New Delhi.

Khan, Mak. (2003) Sustainability through Participation: Roles and Functions for Development Project Managers. Working Paper No. 2. School of Development Studies Melbourne University

Ladner, Mathew. (2006) How to Win the War on Poverty: An Analysis of State Poverty Trends. Policy Report. Goldwater Institute. No. 215, Novemver 14, 2006.

Lipton, Michael. (1980) Why Poor People Stay Poor: Urban Bias in World Development. Harvard University Press. Massachusetts, US.

Mas’oed, Mochtar. (1993) Ekonomi-Politik Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Rakyat. Prospektif. Vol. 5 (1&2): 1–11.

Midgley, James. (1995) Social Development: The Developmental Perspective in Social Welfare. SAGE Publication. Thousand Oaks. London. New Delhi.

Narayan, Deepa et al. (2002) Voices of the Poor: Can Anyone Hear Us? 3rd printing. Published by Oxford University Press for the World Bank. New York.

Peters, Guy. (2001) The Future of Governing. Second Edition, Revised. University Press of Kansas. Kansas, US.

Portes, Alejandro. (1993) On the Sociology of National Development: Theories and Issues in Seligson, Mitchell A. & John T. Passe-Smith (Eds.) Development and Underdevelopment: The Political Economy of Inequality. Lynne Rienner Publisher.

Priyono, B. Herry. (2002) Anthony Giddens Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: KPG (Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia).

Suharto, Edi. (2006) Membangun Masyarakat, Memberdayakan Masyarakat: Kajian Strategis Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Sosial dan Pekerjaan Sosial. Refika Aditama. Bandung. Cet. II

Ife, Jim. (1995) Community Development: Creating . (2006) Konsep dan Strategi Pengentasan

Community Aternatives-Vision, Analysis and Practice. Longman. Melbourne, Australia.

Keman, Hans. (1993) Proliferation of the Welfare State: Comparative Profiles of Publik Sector Management, 1965–90 in Kjell A. Eliasen

Kemiskinan Menurut Perspektif Pekerjaan Sosial. Open Society Institute. http://www. policy. Hu /suharto /makIndo15.html

World Economic Forum. (2004) Global Governance Initiative: Annual Report.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v3i1.2400

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Achmad Habibullah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo by Universitas Trunojoyo Madura is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Terindeks oleh: