Pengaruh Kognitif Siswa Terhadap Kemampuan Interkoneksi Multipel Representasi Siswa pada Topik Dinamika Kimia
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The Development of Two Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Instrument for Evaluating Secondary School Students’ Ability to Describe and Explain Chemical Reactions Using Multiple Levels of Representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293–307.
------------------------------------------------
Farida, I., & Sopandi, W. (2011). Pembelajaran berbasis web, interkoneksi multiple level representasi, Kesetimbangan larutan asam-basa. Jurnal Chemicaurnal Chemica, 12(1), 14–24.
------------------------------------------------
Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Towards a Coherent Model for Macro, Submicro and Symbolic Representations in Chemical Education. In Multiple Representations in Chemical Education (hal. 333–350). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_15
------------------------------------------------
Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and Understanding: Expert and Novice Responses to Different Representations of Chemical Phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949–968.
------------------------------------------------
Lawshe, C. (1975). A quantitative approach to content. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
------------------------------------------------
Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2004). SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (2 ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
------------------------------------------------
Nahadi, N., Firman, H., & Kurniadi, H. (2018). Development and validation of chemistry virtual test based multiple representations. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i1.6963
------------------------------------------------
Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 1–10.
------------------------------------------------
Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2009). The Efficacy of an Alternative Instructional Programme Designed to Enhance Secondary Students’ Competence in the Triplet Relationship. Models and Modeling in Science Education Multiple Representation, 4, 151–168.
------------------------------------------------
Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012). Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175612440286
------------------------------------------------
Zidny, R., Sopandi, W., & Kusrijadi, A. (2013). Analisis pemahaman konsep siswa SMA kelas X pada materi persamaan kimia dan stoikiometri melalui penggunaan diagram submikroskopik serta hubungannya dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Jurnal Riset dan Praktik Pendidikan Kimia, 1(1), 27–36.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v5i1.15318
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.