SISTEM KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAH DAN KOMPLEKSITAS IKON KAMBING PE DI KABUPATEN PURWOREJO

Tatag Handaka, Hermin Indah Wahyuni, Endang Sulastri, Paulus Wiryono

Abstract


ABSTRACT


Ettawa Crossbred (EC) goat farming in Purworejo regency dated back to the era of Dutch colonial
government. The Ministry of Farming was decided that EC as Purworejo’s local crossbred. But the
farmers judge that EC not to be Purworejo’s icon. The farmers was judged that government not serious
made EC as Purworejo’s icon. The aim of this research was to know how the government communication
system produce and reproduce information to solve EC as Purworejo’s icon. The theory used in this
research is communication system in the perspective of Niklas Luhmann. The research method used was
explorative case study. Population of this study was conducted in Purworejo regency as the center of
EC goat farming. The result of the study shows that government communication system was produced
information in encountering the environmental complexity of EC as Purworejo’s icon. The information
about statue of EC as signifier. Government communication system wasn’t produced the icons like EC
products and gifts. The farmers was judged that government not serious to solved EC as Purworejo’
icon. The farmers through farmers group was produced icons like EC’s signifier and EC’s products (milk
powder, caramel, yoghurt, and crackers).


Keywords: government communication system, complexity, icon.


References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Albert, Mathias and Hilkermeier, Lena (ed). 2004. Observing International Relations: Niklas

Luhmann and World Politics. New York: Routledge.

Al-Sharafi, Abdul Gaabbar Mohammed. 2004. Textual Metonymy: A Semiotic Approach. New

York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Bloor, Michael and Wood, Fiona. 2006. Keywords in Qualitative Methods: a Vocabulary of

Research Concepts. California: SAGE Publications Inc.

Daymon, Christine and Holloway, Immy. 2005. Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations

and Marketing Communications. New York: Routledge.

de Laine, Marlene. 2000. Fieldwork, Participation and Practice: Ethics and Dilemmas in

Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Flick, Uwe. 2004. Design and Process in Qualitative Research, in Flick, Uwe and von Kardoff,

Ernst and Steinke, Ines. (eds).. A Companion to Qualitative Research. London: SAGE

Publications Ltd.

Fuchs, Stephan. 1999. Niklas Luhmann. Sociological Theory. Vol. 17. No. 1. pp. 117-119. American

Sociological Association.

Hardiman, F. Budi. 2008. Teori Sistem Niklas Luhmann. Th. XXIX no. 3. Jurnal Filsafat

Driyarkara. Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat (STF) Driyarkara.

Hartley, Jean. 2004. Case Study Research, in Cassell, Catherine and Symon, Gillian. Essential

Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: SAGE Publications

Ltd.

Hays, Patricia A. 2004. Case Study Research, in De Marrais, Kathleen and Lapan, Stephen D. (eds.).

Foundations for Research: Methods of Inquiry in Education and the Social Sciences. NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

King, Michael and Thornhill, Chris. 2003. Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law. New

York: Palgrave Macmillan.

King, Michael and Thornhill, Chris (ed). 2006. Luhmann on Law and Politics: Critical Appraisals

and Applications. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Leydesdorff, Loet. 2000. Luhmann, Habermas, and the Theory of Communication. Systems

Research and Behavioral Science. Vol. 17(3). pp. 273-288.

Lee, D. 2000. The Society of Society: The Grand Finale of Niklas Luhmann. Journal of Sociological

Theory. Vol. 18. pp. 318-342. American Sociological Association. USA.

Luhmann, Niklas. 1986. Love as Passion: the Codification of Intimacy. Translated by Jeremy

Gaines and Doris L. Jones. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Luhmann, Niklas. 1989. Ecological Communication. Translated by John Berdnarz, Jr. Chicago:

The University of Chicago Press.

Luhmann, Niklas. 1992. What is Communication. Journal of the International Comminication

Association. Volume 2, Issue 3. ISSN: 1050-3293. pp. 251-259.

Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Translated by John Bednarz, Jr. with Dirk Baecker.

Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. The Reality of the Mass Media. Translated by Kathleen Cross. California:

Stanford University Press.

Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. Art as A Social System. Translated by Eva M. Knodt. Stanford: Stanford

University Press.

Luhmann, Niklas. 2002. Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Description of Modernity.

Translated by Joseph O’Neil [et al.]. California: Stanford University.

Neuman, W. Lawrence. 2013. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.

th

edition. Diterjemahkan oleh Edina T. Sofia. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Patton, Michael Quinn. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3

edition. California:

SAGE Publications, Inc.

rd

Sambodo, Jarot Sarwo. 2013. Potensi Susu Kambing PE Belum Tergarap.

com.> (diakses tanggal 12 Mei 2014).

Sebeok, Thomas A. 2005. Nonverbal Communication, in Paul Cobley (ed.). The Routledge

Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics. New York: Rutledge.

Shaw, Ian and Gould, Nick. 2001. Qualitative Social Work Research. London: SAGE Publications

Ltd.

Stark, Sheila and Torrance, Harry. 2005. Case Study, in Somekh, Bridget and Lewin, Cathy.

Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

van Lier, Leo. 2004. The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective.

USA: Springer Science.

Viskovatoff, Alex. 1999. Foundations of Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Social Systems. Philosophy

of the Social Sciences. Vol. 29 No. 4. pp. 481-516.

Yin, Robert K. 2011. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ilkom.v10i2.2523

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Tatag Handaka, Hermin Indah Wahyuni, Endang Sulastri, Paulus Wiryono

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Indexed by: