Discourse Battle on Borobudur Temple Tariff Increase Policy in Discourse Analysis Network

Fanny Rosalia

Abstract


This study discusses the dynamic process in canceling the Borobudur Temple tariff increase policy using the Discourse Network Analysis (DNA) method and looking at the dynamics that develop through a network of actors and discourses sourced from various online media. The results showed that there was a change in government policy in a short time. The shift of the coalition of supporters to the opposition shows preventive measures in anticipation of widespread chaos. This shows that there are many factors that influence the policy-making process and political decisions. The DNA method used in this study can help map the relationship between actors and discourse in a network, so as to provide a more comprehensive picture of the policy-making process and political decisions. The research also shows the importance of the role of online media in shaping public opinion and influencing the policy-making process. The results of the study showed a change in policy delivered by the government. The shift of the coalition of supporters to the opposition shows preventive measures in anticipation of widespread chaos. In the policy context, this research makes an important contribution in understanding the dynamic processes that occur in policy-making and political decisions, as well as the factors that influence those processes. This can help the government and relevant stakeholders in making better decisions and taking into account all factors involved in policy making


Keywords


discourse network analysis; discourse coalition theory; Borobudur Temple fare

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, S. Z. (2006). Kebijakan publik. Suara Bebas. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=as2KAAAAMAAJ

Antara. (2022). jumlah-pengunjung-candi-borobudur-terus-meningkat-target-tahun-2022-telah-tercapai. https://jateng.inews.id/berita/jumlah-pengunjung-candi-borobudur-terus-meningkat-target-tahun-2022-telah-tercapai

Dilanggi. (2022). asspi-dukung-rencana-tiket-naik-ke-candi-borobudur-rp-750-ribu.

Eriyanto. (2022). Analisis Jejaring Wacana. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Eriyanto, & Ali, D. J. (2020). Discourse network of a public issue debate: A study on covid-19 cases in indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(3), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2020-3603-13

Farisa. (2022). polemik-kenaikan-tarif-candi-borobudur-tuai-pro-kontra-berujung-ditunda. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/06/11/10541241/polemik-kenaikan-tarif-candi-borobudur-tuai-pro-kontra-berujung-ditunda

Fergie, G., Leifeld, P., Hawkins, B., & Hilton, S. (2019). Mapping discourse coalitions in the minimum unit pricing for alcohol debate: a discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage. Addiction, 114(4), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14514

Glugut, H. (2022). daftar-7-keajaiban-dunia-baru-maaf-tak-ada-candi-borobudur. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/lifestyle/20220720164419-33-357190/daftar-7-keajaiban-dunia-baru-maaf-tak-ada-candi-borobudur

Hajer, M. A. (2006). Doing discourse analysis: coalitions, practices, meaning. Netherlands Geographical Studies (ISSN 0169-4839), 344.

Jin, Y., Schaub, S., Tosun, J., & Wesseler, J. (2022). Does China have a public debate on genetically modified organisms? A discourse network analysis of public debate on Weibo. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 31(6), 732–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211070150

Leifeld, P. (2013). Reconceptualizing Major Policy Change in the Advocacy Coalition Framework: A Discourse Network Analysis of German Pension Politics. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12007

Mahmudan, A. (2022). jumlah-pengunjung-candi-borobudur-anjlok-selama-pandemi. https://dataindonesia.id/sektor-riil/detail/jumlah-pengunjung-candi-borobudur-anjlok-selama-pandemi

Safutra, I. (2022). lantai-candi-borobudur-aus-0175-cm-per-tahun/. https://www.jawapos.com/nasional/07/06/2022/lantai-candi-borobudur-aus-0175-cm-per-tahun/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ilkom.v17i1.18867

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Fanny Rosalia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Indexed by: