Wanprestasi in the Murabahah Agreement: Juridical Analysis of Decision Number 1/Pdt.G.S/2022/PA. At the Religious Court of Appeal

Nurhisna Nurhisna; Mohammad Hipni; Busro Karim

doi:10.21107/ete.v11i1.34380

Wanprestasi in the Murabahah Agreement: Juridical Analysis of Decision Number 1/Pdt.G.S/2022/PA. At the Religious Court of Appeal

Nurhisna Nurhisna, Mohammad Hipni, Busro Karim

Abstract

This study examines the judicial reasoning underlying the resolution of a sharia economic dispute concerning breach of contract in a murabahah financing agreement, as reflected in Decision Number 1/Pdt.G.S/2022/PA.At. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of the court decision and relevant Indonesian regulations governing Islamic finance, while secondary materials include scholarly literature on contract and Islamic commercial law. The findings reveal that the court declared the murabahah agreement legally valid and binding because it fulfilled both statutory requirements and sharia principles. The defendant was found to have committed a default by failing to perform contractual obligations despite prior warnings. The judgment demonstrates the integration of Indonesian civil law and Islamic legal principles, particularly pacta sunt servanda and al-wafā’ bi al-'uqūd (the obligation to honor contracts), in ensuring legal certainty and contractual justice. Furthermore, the decision illustrates that the enforcement of collateral constitutes a legitimate legal remedy in resolving Islamic financing disputes when conducted in accordance with contractual provisions and applicable legislation. The ruling reinforces the principles of legal certainty, fairness, and the protection of parties' rights within Indonesia's sharia economic dispute resolution system

Keywords

Murabahah; Wanprestasi; Islamic economic law.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aryanti, Y. (2016). Multi Akad (Al-Uqud Al-Murakkabah) di Perbankan Syariah Perspektif Fiqh Muamalah. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 15(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v15i2.498

Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2000). Fatwa Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Nomor 04/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 tentang Murabahah.

Hamami, T. (2004). Hukum Acara Perdata Agama: Teori dan Praktiknya dalam Proses Peradilan Agama. Tatanusa.

Huda, N., & Rahmawati, A. (2026). Prinsip Keadilan dalam Ekonomi Islam dan Implementasinya. Musytari: Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi, Dan Ekonomi, 25(5), 985. https://doi.org/10.2324/arbtzb83

Makkulau, A. (2023). Shariah Murabahah Financing in Islamic Banks. BANCO: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Perbankan Syariah, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.35905/banco.v5i1.5157

Musaiyana, M., Ridwan, A. H., & Rusyana, A. Y. (2025). Integrasi Fatwa DSN-MUI ke dalam Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (KHES): Upaya Formulasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah sebagai Produk Perundang-Undangan Nasional. Equality: Journal of Islamic Law, 3(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.15575/ejil.v3i2.1929

Najmudin, S. A., & Muhajirin, M. (2024). Maslahah Mursalah dan Implementasinya dalam Bidang Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah. Taraadin: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 4(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.24853/trd.4.2.113-128

Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Pati Nomor 1/Pdt.G.S/2022/PA.LK, (2022).

Republik Indonesia. (2008). Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (KHES).

Rianto, M. N. (2023). Lembaga Keuangan Syariah. Pustaka Setia.

Rodoni, A., & Yaman, B. (2018). Asymmetric Information and Non-Performing Financing: Study in The Indonesian Islamic Banking Industry. Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah, 10(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v10i2.7392

Rusydiana, A. S., & Devi, A. (2013). Development Strategy of Islamic Finance in Indonesia. Etikonomi, 12(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v12i2.190

Subekti. (2008). Hukum Perjanjian. Intermasa.

Supriyadi, P. A., Simbala, Y., & Tinangon, E. N. (2025). Kajian Yuridis Wanprestasi terhadap Perjanjian Arbitrase yang Sudah Disetujui oleh Para Pihak. Lex Crimen, 13(1), 51.

Tiaranissa, H., & Fitriah, N. (2025). Implementasi Maqashid Syariah dalam Regulasi dan Kebijakan Ekonomi Islam di Indonesia: Perspektif Teoritis dan Praktis. Maslahah: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Ekonomi Syariah, 3(3), 325. https://doi.org/10.59059/maslahah.v3i3.2539

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2006). Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Peradilan Agama.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 14 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana Ekonomi Syariah.

Wahab, A. (2022). Implementasi Maqashid Syariah dalam Operasional Audit Syariah pada Lembaga Keuangan Syariah. J-HES: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 6(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.26618/j-hes.v6i01.6137

Zuhdi, M. H. (2017). Prinsip-Prinsip Akad dalam Transaksi Ekonomi Islam. Iqtishaduna, 8(2), 132. https://doi.org/10.20414/iqtishaduna.v8i2.1768

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ete.v11i1.34380