Judge's Ex Officio Authority in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution Without The Presence of The Defendant Civil Procedural Law Perspective Case Number 1716/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Bjn

Afifah Rohadatul Ais; Shofiyun Nahidloh

doi:10.21107/ete.v10i1.30404

Judge's Ex Officio Authority in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution Without The Presence of The Defendant Civil Procedural Law Perspective Case Number 1716/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Bjn

Afifah Rohadatul Ais, Shofiyun Nahidloh

Abstract

In the procedural law system applicable in the judicial environment, there is an ex officio right. In this case, a judge can determine a policy on a decision that is considered good and fair because of his position. Law No. 48 of 2009 emphasizes that courts must adjudicate without discrimination and are obliged to assist those seeking justice. This study aims to determine the ex officio authority of judges in resolving sharia economic disputes without the presence of the defendant from a civil law perspective, using case study 1716/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Bjn. This study is a descriptive qualitative research with an empirical legal approach. The primary data source used is interview data from the panel of judges and the deputy court clerk in case 1716/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Bjn, while the secondary data source is obtained from a list of references related to the material to be analyzed, namely legal documents such as laws, regulations, and court decisions. The findings of this study indicate that judges conduct trials using their ex officio authority to ensure legal effectiveness and certainty, particularly in regulating the execution of collateral objects that are not explicitly requested in the petition. Nevertheless, the judge's actions remain consistent with the principles of civil procedure law, including legal certainty, justice, and judicial proactivity within the boundaries of the authority granted. The exercise of ex officio authority demonstrates that in matters of Islamic economics, judges are not only bound by the reasons stated in the complaint but also tasked with formulating effective and enforceable decisions.

Keywords

Ex Officio, Sharia Economic Dispute, Verstek.

References

A.L, M. (2024, November 27). Wawancara Pribadi Dengan Ketua Majelis Hakim. (A. R. Ais, Interviewer)

B.E. (2025, Maret 4). Wawancara Pribadi Dengan Panitera Penggati. (A. R. Ais, Interviewer)

Harun, I. A., Suleman, Z., & Yusuf, S. D. (2023). Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Dan Hambatan Penyelesaiannya Di Pengadilan Agama Gorontalo. Mutawazin (Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah), 4(1), 30–41. Https://Doi.Org/10.54045/Mutawazin.V4i1.732

Hidayatullah, S., Mahmudah, H., & Melati, R. (2022). Eksistensi Penerapan Hak Ex Officio Hakim Dalam Putusan Di Pengadilan Agama Bima. Sangaji Jurnal Pemiliram Syariah Dan Hukum, 6(1), 186–199. Https://Doi.Org/10.52266/Sangaji.V6i2.1319

Ihzafitri, E. I., Roihanah, R., Salsabila, R. A., & Mudhi’ah, Q. F. (2022). Implementasi Kewenangan Ex-Officio Hakim Dalam Perkara Cerai Talak Di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Kediri. Jurnal Antologi Hukum, 2(2), 224. Https://Doi.Org/10.21154/Antologihukum.V2i2.1329

Kurniasih, D. (2018). Persepsi Hakim Terhadap Penerapan Asas Ultra Petitum Partium Dan Hak Ex Officio Hakim Dalam Perkara Di Pengadilan Agama (Studi Pada Pengadilan Agama Gunung Sugih Lampung Tengah). Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro Lampung.

Muara Teweh, P. A. (2021). Apa Sih Peradilan Agama? Badilag.Mahkamahagung. Https://Badilag.Mahkamahagung.Go.Id/Seputar-Peradilan-Agama/Berita-Daerah/Apa-Sih-Peradilan-Agama

Pengadilan Agama Bojonegoro. (2024). Tugas Pokok Dan Fungsi Pengadilan Agama Bojonegoro. Pengadilan Agama Bojonegoro. Https://Www.Pa-Bojonegoro.Go.Id/Tentang-Pengadian/Tugas-Poko-Dan-Fungsi

Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana.

Salinan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Bojonegoro 1716/Pdt.G/2024/Pa.Bjn. (N.D.). Diambil 14 November 2024, Dari Https://Putusan3.Mahkamahagung.Go.Id/Direktori/Putusan/Zaef910ca008f596aa15313430313238.Html

Siswajanthy, F., & Abid. (2021). Gugatan Sederhana Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia. Palar | Pakuan Law Review, 7(2), 147–159. Https://Doi.Org/10.33751/Palar.V7i2.3737

Subagyono, B. S. A., Wahyudi, J., & Akbar, R. (2014). Kajian Penerapan Asas Ultra Petita Pada Petitum Ex Aequo Et Bono. Yuridika, 29(1), 100–112. Https://Doi.Org/10.20473/Ydk.V29i1.360

Subekti, & R., T. (1979). Kamus Hukum (Cetakan 4). Pradnya Paramitha.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama, Pub. L. No. 3, 1 (2006).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (2009).

Wijayanta, T. (2014). Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Putusan Kepailitan Pengadilan Niaga. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(2), 217–226.

Yumna, L., & Taufik, A. (2023). Analisa Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dan Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum. Jurnal Emanasi, Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman Dan Sosial, 6(1), 1–8.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ete.v10i1.30404