Sale Legality of Rejected Bandage on Shopee Application from The Perspective of Sharia Economic Law and Protection Law Consumer

M Taufik Naufal, Eko Arief Cahyono, Dery Ariswanto

Abstract


Currently, reject products are not foreign commodities traded in Indonesia, one of which is reject sanitary napkin products. Many of these rejected sanitary napkin products are circulating on the market, such as those on the Shopee application. Reject sanitary napkins themselves are described as products that do not pass the quality control (QC) stage and have defects or damage that should not be suitable for distribution based on Indonesian law. From the perspective of sharia economic law, rejected sanitary napkins with their dangerous risks (dharar) to the health of their users can become a buying and selling practice that is prohibited due to the conditions of the object. However, many rejected sanitary napkin products are still circulating in the community. The research results show that rejected sanitary napkins sold through the Shopee Application are products that are in a condition that does not meet production standards (damaged) and are in a condition of defects and holes. Findings in the field are the reasons why the sale of rejected sanitary napkins violates the Consumer Protection Law. From the perspective of sharia economic law, the sale of rejected sanitary napkins can provide permissible law if it does not cause definite harm or risk to the user's health, but if the product causes negative impact then this practice is a prohibited sale and purchase. From a legal dharar perspective, this is permissible because the impact is a khafi, or madarat, whose impact is uncertain.

Keywords


Al-Dharar, Pembalut Reject, Perlindungan Konsumen

Full Text:

PDF

References


A.D., Inten Esti Pratiwi. “Ramai Soal Penjualan Pembalut ‘Reject’, Masih Amankah Digunakan?” Kompas.com, 2023. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2023/10/16/071500465/ramai-soal-penjualan-pembalut-reject-masih-amankah-digunakan?page=all.

Al-Asqolani, Imam Ibnu Hajar. Bulugul Maram. Bandung: Jabal, 1956.

Al-Nadwi, Ali Ahmad. Al-Qawaid Al-Fiqhiyyah. Damaskus: Dar Qalam, 1986.

Azqia, Hidayatul. “Jual Beli Dalam Perspektif Islam.” Al Arsyad 1, no. September 2016 (2022): 1–6.

Bakry, Nazar. Problematika Pelaksanaan Fiqih Islam Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LKIS, 2013.

Bisri, Moh. Adib. Al Faraidul Bahiyyah. Rembang: Menara Kudus, 1977.

Bojonegoro, Wawancara Dokter Spesialis Obgyn RS Ibnu Sina. “Andy Sugiharto Wonodihardjo.” 2024.

Choiriyah, Siti. Mu’amalah Jual Beli Dan Selain Jual Beli. Pertama. Sukoharjo: CDAQ STAIN Surakarta, 2009.

Dery Ariswanto. “Analisis Syarat In’iq Dalam Pembentukan Sebuah Akad Syariah.” Jurnal Peradaban Dan Hukum Islam Vol.4, no. 1 (2021).

Fathoni, Nur. “Konsep Jual Beli Dalam Fatwa DSN-MUI.” Economica Volume IV (2013).

Ghazzaly, Abdul Rahman Al. Fikih Muamalat. Cet. Perta. jakarta: kencana, 2010.

Hasan, Akhmad Farroh. Fiqh Muammalah Dari Klasik Hingga Kontemporer (Teori Dan Praktek). Cet. 2. Malang: UIN-Maliki Malang

Press, 2014.

Hasan, Ali. Berbagai Macam Transaksi Dalam Islam (Fiqih Muamalah). Jakarta: Grafindo Persada, 2003.

Hidayat, Enang. Fiqih Jual Beli. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2015.

Kemenag. “Sofwere Digital Al-Qur’an in Word.” Kementerian Agama, n.d.

Kepala Dinas Kesehatan Bojonegoro. “Wawancara Dengan Kepala Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Bojonegoro Imam Wahyudi.” 2024.

Nana Sudjana, Awal Kusuma. “Proposal Penelitian Di Perguruan Tinggi.” Sinar Baru Algnesindo, 2008.

Pratiwi, Dheandra Nurul. “Dampak Keberadaan Industri Terhadap Perubahan Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi Masyrakat Di Desa Andir Kecamatan Jatiwangi Kabupaten Majalengka Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.” Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2020.

Presiden Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 1999.

Rian Tineges. “Mengenal Macam Analisis Dengan Metode Analisis Data Sekunder.” DQLab 01, no. 18 (2021): 1.

Ridlwan Hambali, HM, Sandriana J Nendissa, Eko Cahyo Mayndarto, Moh Muchlis Djibran, and Arfandy Dinsar. “Pengaruh Fintech Dan Eccomerce Terhadap Kinerja UMKM Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika 8, no. 2 (April 2024).

Rokom. “Pembaut Yang Beredar Sesuai Syarat Ketentuan.” Kemenkes RI, 2015. https://sehatnegeriku.kemkes.go.id/baca/rilis-media/20150708/2612563/pembalut-yang-beredar-sesuai-syarat-kesehatan/#:~:text=kemkes.go.id.

Suhendi, Hendi. Fikih Muamalah. Jakarta: Raja Graindo Persada, 2005.

Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016.

Syabir, Muhammad Ustman. Al Madkhal Ila Fiqh Al-Muamalat Al-Maliyah. Cet. 2. Oman: Dar al-Nafais, 2010.

Syaikhu. Fikih Muamalah: Memahami Konsep Dan Dialektika Kontemporer. K-Media. Pertama. Yogyakarta: K-Media, 2020.

Umar, Ahmad Mukhtar Abdul Hamid. Mu’jam Al-Lugah Al-’Arabiyah Al-Mu’asirah. Jil. 2. Kairo: ’Alam al-Kutub, 2008.

Zuhaili, Wahbah. Nazariyyat Al-Darurah As-Shari’ah. Beirut: Mu’assasah ar-Risalah, 1985.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ete.v8i1.27193

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 M Taufik Naufal, Eko Arief Cahyono

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

         
Creative Commons License

Et-Tijarie: Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis Syariah by Universitas Trunojoyo Madura is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2549-6794 (Online)  and ISSN 2442-2932 (Print)

View My Stats