Transforming Self-Efficacy into High Performance: The Critical Role of McClelland’s Achievement Motivation in Labor-Intensive Work Environments

Ainur ridho, Zainiyatul Afifah

Abstract


Self-efficacy has long been recognized as a critical factor influencing employee performance; however, empirical evidence indicates that its impact is often indirect, requiring the role of mediating variables. This study aims to examine the effect of self-efficacy on employee performance through McClelland’s achievement motivation as a mediating variable in PT. Buana Tengka Garment. Employing a quantitative survey method, data were collected from 92 respondents selected using Slovin’s formula from a population of 120 employees. Regression analysis and Sobel test results reveal that self-efficacy does not directly affect performance but significantly influences achievement motivation, which in turn significantly impacts performance. Furthermore, achievement motivation is found to significantly mediate the relationship between self-efficacy and performance. These findings imply that improving employees’ self-efficacy must be accompanied by strategies to strengthen achievement motivation, such as setting challenging targets, implementing performance-based rewards, and providing constructive feedback, to optimize performance in labor-intensive industries


Keywords


Self-efficacy, motivasi berprestasi, kinerja karyawan, mediasi, industri garmen

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Fitriani, F., & Nofriansyah, D. (2019). The influence of self-efficacy on employee performance through achievement motivation. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(8), 1358–1362.

Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107

Karatepe, O. M. (2013). High-performance work practices, work social support and their effects on job embeddedness and turnover intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(6), 903–921. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2012-0092

Lirio, P., Lee, M. D., Williams, M. L., Haugen, L. K., & Kossek, E. E. (2014). The inclusion challenge with reduced-load professionals: The role of the manager. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1140–1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.816863

Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316472.001.0001

Mahmood, A., Ariza-Montes, A., Han, H., & Vega-Muñoz, A. (2019). The role of self-efficacy in achieving sustainable performance through job satisfaction and organizational commitment: An empirical study of the healthcare sector. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(6), 784–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1647556

McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press.

Muslikhah, M., & Rohmadi, T. (2018). The effect of self-efficacy and work environment on employee performance through motivation. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 16(2), 477–486.

Pratiwi, D. A., & Margaretha, M. (2017). The influence of self-efficacy on job satisfaction and employee performance. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(S4), 685–698.

Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.

Sutisna, A., & Permana, A. (2022). Achievement motivation and employee performance: Evidence from service industries. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(6), 2012–2029. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2020-0530

Widiyanti, E., & Lestari, E. (2020). The role of achievement motivation in mediating self-efficacy and employee performance. Management Science Letters, 10(3), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.9.009

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013111

Yolanda, T., & Santoso, E. B. (2020). The influence of achievement motivation on employee performance in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(4), 1035–1046




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ee.v11i1.31508

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Ainur ridho, Zainiyatul Afifah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

https://osborneswandshop.com/collections/wands

slot gacor

dewalangit77

Slot777

tankasnet

coloktoto

coloktoto

coloktoto

situs toto

situs gacor

slot

slot777

mantis88

slot

cipit88

www.christofoerster.com/datenschutzerklaerung/

https://pppm.stikesbanyuwangi.ac.id/jurnal/

https://revista.sbfoton.org.br/contato/

w11poker

Situs gacor mahjong

borneo303

koin404

harta88

Slot gacor

toko123