Pilkada, Dinasti Politik Di Era Desentralisasi (Studi Tentang Habitus And Field, Aktor Politik Dalam Kontestasi Pilkada Kab. Bangkalan Yang Melahirkan Dinasti Politik)

Yudhi Rachman

Abstract


This article attempts to capture the power developed in an area aftermath of reformation era in 1998 marked by implementing autonomous region or decentralized. Power in The New Order Regime, that was The Centralistic changed with the emergence of the local political elite that affirming their power by various sources of capital. By having a more open space for local figures to snatch the seat of power at the local level in the county, political competition then became closer in social community base level. Those who have a culture of social capital, networks and other social networking might be easier to perform. No exception figure of “Kiai” head of Islamiccommunity originating from habitus religious activities and education in boarding school and other community social activities. In Bangkalan regency Habitus-based Political Elite Kiai boils down to descendants of the BaniKholildiasporic in various organizations either initiating Community-Social Organizations, political parties and legislative Institutions and Executive. The method used in this research is descriptive-qualitative structure of Agency Bourdieu's approach with data mining using in-depth interviews and technical documentation. The end result of this thesis was to see that the political and Dynastic Politics Breeds successfully built by RKH Fuad Amin during his leadership in two periods, ten years later continued by the winning of his son MakmunIbnuFuad with a majority of votes 93,47 percent. After his main rival who is also a descendant of BaniKholil, namely KH Imam BuchoriKholil failed to follow the contestation elections directly. In contestation elections in Bangkalan Regency, the ability of the group or Political Actor in using sources of capital and symbolic power in a society is still very effective in managing their Paternalistic room practices.In the analysis of Structure-Agency Bourdieu's perspective,
social space and social groups who control it are the products of a historical struggle continuously updated for contested or won as well as establish dominance in power.


Keywords


Habitus and Field Actors of politics, elections, Political Dynasty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Singarimbun, Masri. “Tipe, Metode dan Proses Penelitian”, dalam Masri Singarimbun dan Sofian Effendi (ed). Metode Penelitian Survey. ( Jakarta: LP3ES. 1984).

Neuman, W.Lawrence. 2003 Social Research Methods; Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, fifth edition (Boston: Pearson Education, Inc : 413-415. 2003).

Deflem, Matheu. Welfare, Political Leadership, and State Formation: The Case of The Zulu Kingdom, 1808-1879, ( Ethnology vol 38, no. 4, pp 371-391. autum 1999).

Simon, Marlin K. (Spring 2008), „Building Leadership, Not Leaders‟, (book review dari Ulrich, D, & Smallwood, N. (2007). Leadership Brand: Developing customer-focused leaders to

drive performance and build lasting value. Boston: harvard Bussiness School Press) Journal Of Leadership Studies Vol. 2 No. 1.

Renshon, Stanley A. „Politicaal Leadership as Social Capital: Governing in Devided National Culture‟, ( Political Psychology, Vol. 21 No. 1 2000).

Nye Jr, Joseph S. Soft Power, ( Public Affairs. 2004).

Nye Jr. Joseph S. The Power To Lead, USA. ( Yale University Press,2004).

Ritzer, George & Goodman J Douglas. Teori Sosiologi, Dari Teori Sosiologi Klasik sampai perkembangan mutakhir Teori Sosial Postmodern, ( Yogyakarta : Kreasi Wacana.2008).

Albrow, Martin, Max Weber's construction of social theory, ( Hampshire : Macmillan, 1990).

Suyanto, Bagong dan Sutinah (ed) 2010, Metode Penelitian Sosial : Berbagai Alternatif Pendekatan . Jakarta, Kencana.

Bourdieu, Pierre, “The Philosophical Institution”, terj. dari bahasa Prancis oleh Kathleen McLaughlin, dalam Alan Montefiore (Ed.), Philosophy in France Today, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).

Field, John. Modal Sosial, ( Bantul : , Kreasi Wacana, 2010).

Jenkins, Richard, Pierre Bourdieu, (London: Routledge: 1992).

Wacquant, Loïc, “Toward a Reflexive Sociology: A Workshop with Pierre Bourdieu”, (Sociological Theory Vol. 7, 1989).

Wacquant, Loïc, “From Ruling Class to Field of Power: An Interview with Pierre Bourdieu on La noblesse d’État”, ( Theory, Culture & Society Vol. 10, 1993).

Susan, Novri MA, Sosiologi Konflik dan Isu – Isu Konflik Kontemporer, ( Jakarta, Kencana, 2009).

Mutahir, Arizal. Intelektual Kolektif Pierre Bourdieu, Sebuah Gerakan Untuk Melawan Dominasi, ( Bantul : Kreasi Wacana, 2011).

Ahmad Rifai, Mien, Manusia Madura, (Pembawaan, Perilaku, etos Kerja. Penampilan. Dan Pandangan Hidupnya, seperti Dicitrakan Peribahasanya),Jakarta, Pilar Media (Anggota IKAPI: 2007).

Munir,Mutmainnah. Kiai Dan Dinamika Politik Lokal di Kabupaten Bangkalan dan Sumenep, Madura Dalam Desentralisasi, Globalisasi dan Demokrasi Lokal (Jakarta, Pustaka LP3ES : 2005).

Nico Ainul Yaqin dkk, Sang pemimpin, 10 Tahun Kepemimpinan RKH Fuad Amin Imron, (2012).

Leo Agustino. Dinasti Politik Pasca Orde Baru. (Jakarta : Prisma Vol 29. No 3 Juli, 2010).

Leo Agustino. Sisi Gelap Otonomi Daerah. ( Jakarta : Widya Padjajaran, 2011).

Zamroni, M Imam, Kekuasaan Juragan Dan Kyai Di Madura, KARSA, Vol. XII No. 2 Oktober 2007.

Umar Syadat Hasibuan, Ambang Batas Dinasti Politik, Kompas 11 April 2013.

Kompas, 7 Desember, 2011

Kompas, 23 Februari, 2013

Surabaya Pos. tanggal 23, Oktober 2012

Kabar Madura, 8 Desember 2012

Koran Madura, 11 Desember 2012

Koran Madura, 12 Desember 2012




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/djs.v8i2.3733

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


All publications by DIMENSI - Journal of Sociology are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.