Kecerdasan Buatan dan Kognisi Manusia dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Kebijakan Pertahanan

Aris Sarjito

Abstract


Integrasi Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) dalam pengambilan keputusan kebijakan pertahanan menghadirkan implikasi besar terhadap proses kognitif manusia, bias kognitif, dan pertimbangan etis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi bagaimana AI memengaruhi kognisi manusia dalam konteks pertahanan, mengidentifikasi dan memitigasi bias kognitif yang ditimbulkan oleh AI, dan mengkaji implikasi etis AI dalam pengambilan keputusan pertahanan otonom. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif, data sekunder dari laporan pemerintah, jurnal akademis, publikasi lembaga think tank, dan artikel media dianalisis secara sistematis. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa AI meningkatkan pemrosesan informasi dan pemikiran kritis, tetapi juga memperburuk bias kognitif tertentu, seperti bias konfirmasi. Strategi untuk memitigasi bias ini mencakup beragam kumpulan data pelatihan dan validasi algoritma yang ketat. Secara etis, penelitian ini menggarisbawahi perlunya transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan pedoman ketat untuk mengatur penggunaan AI dalam operasi militer, khususnya yang melibatkan akibat yang mematikan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa meskipun AI menawarkan manfaat yang signifikan dalam pembuatan kebijakan pertahanan, pengelolaan tantangan kognitif dan etika yang cermat sangat penting untuk memastikan penggunaan yang bertanggung jawab dan efektif.

Keywords


bias kognitif, implikasi etika, kebijakan pertahanan, kecerdasan buatan, kognisi manusia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akinrinola, O., Okoye, C. C., Ofodile, O. C., & Ugochukwu, C. E. (2024). Navigating and reviewing ethical dilemmas in AI development: Strategies for transparency, fairness, and accountability. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 18(3), 50–58.

Board, D. I. (2019). AI principles: recommendations on the ethical use of artificial intelligence by the department of defense: supporting document. United States Department of Defense.

Brown, T., & Wilson, P. (2022). Evaluating AI Biases: Continuous Testing and Validation in Defense Applications. Journal of Military Ethics, 29(3), 300–309.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Davis, P. K., & Bracken, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence for wargaming and modeling. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 15485129211073126.

De Spiegeleire, S., Maas, M., & Sweijs, T. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the future of defense: strategic implications for small-and medium-sized force providers. The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). (2023). Autonomous Systems in Modern Defense. DARPA Research Papers.

Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Coeckelbergh, M., de Prado, M. L., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2023). Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation. Information Fusion, 99, 101896.

Felzmann, H., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., & Tamò-Larrieux, A. (2020). Towards transparency by design for artificial intelligence. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 3333–3361.

Green, J., Brown, T., & Smith, P. (2022). AI and Cognitive Bias Mitigation in Defense Decision-Making. International Journal of Defense Policy, 33(4), 567–589.

Guiora, A. N. (2017). Accountability and Decision Making an Autonomous Warfare: Who Is Responsible. Utah L. Rev., 393.

Horowitz, M. C., & Kahn, L. (2024). Bending the Automation Bias Curve: A Study of Human and AI-Based Decision Making in National Security Contexts. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2), sqae020.

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). (2023). Ethical Implications of AI in Military Operations. ICRC Policy Briefs.

Johnson, J. (2019). Artificial intelligence & future warfare: implications for international security. Defense & Security Analysis, 35(2), 147–169.

Johnson, K. N. (2019). Automating the risk of bias. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 87, 1214.

Koene, A., Clifton, C., Hatada, Y., Webb, H., & Richardson, R. (2019). A governance framework for algorithmic accountability and transparency.

Kundi, B., El Morr, C., Gorman, R., & Dua, E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Bias: A scoping review. AI and Society, 199–215.

Lauterbach, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence and policy: quo vadis? Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21(3), 238–263.

Liu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2023). Human-in-the-Loop Systems: Enhancing AI Decision-Making in Defense. Defense Technology Review, 42(2), 210–230.

Lucarelli, S., Marrone, A., & Moro, F. N. (2021). NATO decision-making in the age of big data and artificial intelligence. Brussels: NATO.

Mensah, G. B. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Ethics: A Comprehensive Review of Bias Mitigation, Transparency, and Accountability in AI Systems. November.

Morgan, F. E., Boudreaux, B., Lohn, A. J., Ashby, M., Curriden, C., Klima, K., & Grossman, D. (2020). Military applications of artificial intelligence. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

Nishant, R., Schneckenberg, D., & Ravishankar, M. N. (2024). The formal rationality of artificial intelligence-based algorithms and the problem of bias. Journal of Information Technology, 39(1), 19–40.

Oniani, D., Hilsman, J., Peng, Y., Poropatich, R. K., Pamplin, J. C., Legault, G. L., & Wang, Y. (2023). Adopting and expanding ethical principles for generative artificial intelligence from military to healthcare. NPJ Digital Medicine, 6(1), 225.

RAND Corporation. (2022). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Modern War-Gaming.

Rashid, A. Bin, Kausik, A. K., Al Hassan Sunny, A., & Bappy, M. H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the military: An overview of the capabilities, applications, and challenges. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2023(1), 8676366.

Rastogi, C., Zhang, Y., Wei, D., Varshney, K. R., Dhurandhar, A., & Tomsett, R. (2022). Deciding fast and slow: The role of cognitive biases in AI-assisted decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW1), 1–22.

Santhi, K., Shri, M. L., Joshi, S., & Sharma, G. (2024). AI in Defence and Ethical Concerns. 2024 Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ICETITE), 1–7.

Sarjito, A., & Saputro, G. E. (2024). INTERSEKSIONALITAS PEMIKIRAN STRATEGIS DAN PEMBUATAN KEBIJAKAN PERTAHANAN BERBASIS BUKTI. Jurnal Governansi, 10(1), 87–114.

Sayler, K. M. (2020). Artificial intelligence and national security. Congressional Research Service, 45178.

Scatiggio, V. (2020). Tackling the issue of bias in artificial intelligence to design AI-driven fair and inclusive service systems. How human biases are breaching into AI algorithms, with severe impacts on individuals and societies, and what designers can do to face this phenomenon and change for the better.

Schwartz, R., Schwartz, R., Vassilev, A., Greene, K., Perine, L., Burt, A., & Hall, P. (2022). Towards a standard for identifying and managing bias in artificial intelligence (Vol. 3). US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Shneiderman, B. (2020). Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 10(4), 1–31.

Singhal, A., Neveditsin, N., Tanveer, H., & Mago, V. (2024). Toward Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics in AI for Social Media and Health Care: Scoping Review. JMIR Medical Informatics, 12(1), e50048.

Tech Innovator, S., & Kumardev, C. (2021). Strategy development in a rapidly changing world.

Tiainen, N. (2023). Mitigating Confirmation Bias Caused by Social Media Algorithms.

Van Den Bosch, K., & Bronkhorst, A. (2018). Human-AI cooperation to benefit military decision making.

Wang, H., Liu, Y., & Chen, X. (2023). Predictive Analytics in Geopolitical Strategy: Applications and Implications. Journal of Defense Studies, 45(2), 123–140.

Yu, P. K. (2020). The algorithmic divide and equality in the age of artificial intelligence. Fla. L. Rev., 72, 331.

Zaitsava, M., Marku, E., & Di Guardo, M. C. (2022). Is data-driven decision-making driven only by data? When cognition meets data. European Management Journal, 40(5), 656–670.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/djs.v13i2.32530

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


All publications by DIMENSI - Journal of Sociology are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.