STUDENTS MISCONCEPTION: THE DEVELOPING OF SOCRATIC DIALOGUE MEDIA ON TEMPERATURE AND HEAT
Abstract
Full Text:
DOWNLOADReferences
Alwan, A. A. (2011). Misconception of heat and temperature Among physics students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.074
Antwi, V., & Aryeetey, C. (2015). Students’ Conception on Heat and Temperature: A Study on Two Senior High Schools in the Central Region of Ghana, 4(4), 14.
Başer, M. (2006). Fostering Conceptual Change by Cognitive Conflict Based Instruction on Students’ Understanding of Heat and Temperature Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2, 96–114. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75458
Boa, E. A., Wattanatorn, A., & Tagong, K. (2018). The development and validation of the Blended Socratic Method of Teaching (BSMT): An instructional model to enhance critical thinking skills of undergraduate business students. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.01.001
Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2015). The Importance of Language in Students’ Reasoning About Heat in Thermodynamic Processes. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 759–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025246
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Qualitativ And Quantitative Research. Pearson Education, Inc. Retrieved from http://pearsonhighered.com
Kang, H., Scharmann, L. C., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2010). Cognitive conflict and situational interest as factors influencing conceptual change, 5(4), 383–405.
Leinonen, R., Asikainen, M. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2013). Overcoming students’ misconceptions concerning thermal physics with the aid of hints and peer interaction during a lecture course. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.9.020112
Marcisz, N. A., & Woien, S. (2010). A Case Study: Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in an Online Health Care Ethics Course, 6(2), 9.
Oyler, D. R., & Romanelli, F. (2014). The Fact of IgnoranceRevisiting the Socratic Method as a Tool for Teaching Critical Thinking. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(7), 144. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe787144
Pebriana, I. N. (2016). Pengembangan Media Dialog Sokratik Sebagai Alat Bantu Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Kalor. Skripsi.
Prince, M., Vigeant, M., & Nottis, K. (2012). Development of the Heat and Energy Concept Inventory: Preliminary Results on the Prevalence and Persistence of Engineering Students’ Misconceptions. Journal of Engineering Education, 101, 412–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00056.x
Raymond A. Serway, & Jewet Jr., J. W. (2014). Physics for Scientists and Engineers (9th ed.). United States of America: Physical Sciences: Mary Finch.
Sunardi, S., Retno P., P., & Andreas B., D. (2016). Fisika untuk Siswa SMA/MA XI. Penerbit Yrama Widya. Retrieved from http://yrama-widya.co.id
Sutopo, & Waldrip, B. (2014). Impact of A Representational Approach on Students’ Reasoning And Conceptual Understanding in Learning Mechanics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 741–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9431-y
Varma, P., He, B., Iter, D., Xu, P., Yu, R., De Sa, C., & Ré, C. (2016). Socratic Learning: Augmenting Generative Models to Incorporate Latent Subsets in Training Data. ArXiv:1610.08123 [Cs, Stat]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.08123
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/jps.v5i2.4551
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal Pena Sains Indexed by:
Jurnal Pena Sains is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright © 2014 Science Education Program Study, University of Trunojoyo Madura.